Radiographic Outcomes of Cotton Osteotomy in Treatment of Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

Background: We investigated the long-term radiographic outcomes of the Cotton osteotomy performed at our institution by the 2 senior authors in conjunction with other reconstruction procedures to correct adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). Methods: We retrospectively studied patients who underwent Cotton osteotomy between 2005 and 2010 with minimum 4-year follow-up. Radiographic assessment was made on weightbearing radiographs taken at 4 different time intervals: preoperative, early (first postoperative full weightbearing), intermediate (between 1 and 4 years postoperatively), and final (over 4 years postoperatively). Results: Nineteen patients were included. Final follow-up was 8.6 ± 2.6 years. The lateral talus–first metatarsal angle improved significantly from preoperative to early radiographs (n = 15; mean change: 30 degrees, 95% CI, 21.6-38.7; P < .0001). A significant loss of correction was observed between intermediate and final radiographs (n = 11; mean change: 17 degrees, 95% CI, 8.1-26.4; P < .0001). Of 14 patients with early radiographs, 8 lost >50% of the correction initially achieved. Medial column height decreased by 3.0 mm (95% CI, 1.80-7.90; P = .35) between early radiographs and final follow-up. Discussion: This is the longest reported radiographic follow-up of the Cotton osteotomy performed to address forefoot varus deformity as part of AAFD. The Cotton osteotomy achieved radiographic correction of the medial longitudinal arch at early follow-up, but approximately half of the patients had lost over 50% of that correction at final follow-up. The lengthened angular shape of the cuneiform did not collapse, implying that further collapse occurred through the medial column joints. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Lapicotton technique in the treatment of progressive collapsing foot deformity

We present a technical surgical description of a 36-year-old female diagnosed with Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD) treated with a medial displacement calcaneus osteotomy, a lateral column lengthening, and a modified Lapidus fusion. In order to increase the plantar flexion power of this arthrodesis and minimize the loss in ray length with joint preparation, a bone block structured graft was used. Fixation was performed using a post implant in the medial cuneiform with crossing screws though the surfaces and the graft. Forefoot varus was properly corrected intraoperatively by using the described surgical technique. Satisfactory functional short-term results and an excellent alignment was accomplished. Level of Evidence V; Therapeutic Studies; Expert Opinion.

Consensus on Indications for Medial Cuneiform Opening Wedge (Cotton) Osteotomy in the Treatment of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity

Recommendation: Forefoot varus is a physical and radiographic examination finding associated with the Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD). Varus position of the forefoot relative to the hindfoot is caused by medial midfoot collapse with apex plantar angulation of the medial column. Some surgeons use the term forefoot supination to describe this same deformity (see Introduction section with nomenclature). Correction of this deformity is important to restore the weightbearing tripod of the foot and help resist a recurrence of foot collapse. When the forefoot varus deformity is isolated to the medial metatarsal and medial cuneiform, correction is indicated with an opening wedge medial cuneiform (Cotton) osteotomy, typically with interposition of an allograft bone wedge from 5 to 11 mm in width at the base. When the forefoot varus is global, involving varus angulation of the entire forefoot and midfoot relative to the hindfoot, other procedures are needed to adequately correct the deformity. Level of Evidence: Level V, consensus, expert opinion.

Radiographic Outcomes and Complications of Medial Column Correction in Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity Using A Titanium Wedge

Category: Hindfoot, Midfoot/Forefoot, Flatfoot Introduction/Purpose: Forefoot varus is a common component of flatfoot deformity that is often surgically addressed. There are multiple options to plantarflex the medial column of the foot, with midfoot fusion and the Cotton osteotomy being the most common. This study analyzes radiographic outcomes and complications when a titanium wedge is used for structural support in a dorsal opening wedge Cotton osteotomy of the medial cuneiform. Methods: Between December 2016 and May 2018, 32 feet in 31 patients were treated with medial column titanium wedges for residual forefoot varus in association with flatfoot corrections. All participants had preoperative and weight-bearing postoperative radiographs examined for analysis of radiographic correction. The average age of the patients was 41.1 years (Range: 12-70). The average follow-up time for patients was 8.1 months (6-17 months). All patients underwent a six-month non-operative treatment course prior to operative intervention. The average time from the initial visit with the primary surgeon (JFD, ARK) to the day of surgical intervention was 211 days (29-1296 days). The choice to use a titanium wedge, versus an alternative method of correction of the medial column, was at the discretion of the primary surgeon (JFD, ARK). Results: A dorsal opening wedge medial cuneiform osteotomy was performed in all patients. All radiographic parameters showed statistically significant correction from preoperative to postoperative. All cases had multiple concomitant procedures performed to address the flatfoot deformity, so it is difficult to isolate the effect of the medial cuneiform osteotomy. 30/31 cases went on to successful union of the osteotomy within the study follow-up period. There were no instances of hardware pain requiring implant removal. There was 1 case of plantar gapping at the osteotomy site and implant loosening that required revision to a larger titanium wedge which healed uneventfully. No implants had supplemental fixation or additional bone graft placement at the osteotomy site. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this represents the first reported series on the use of structural titanium wedges with an opening wedge osteotomy of the medial cuneiform. There is limited data regarding the use of metal wedges for flatfoot correction. Nearly every patient in our series underwent concomitant procedures as part of the flatfoot reconstruction. This makes it difficult to isolate the effect of the deformity correction provided solely by the medial column correction. Our study suggests that metal wedges are both safe and effective for use in medial column correction, and future studies comparing titanium wedges to traditional techniques are needed.

Complications and Early Radiographic Outcomes of Flatfoot Deformity Correction With Metallic Midfoot Opening Wedge Implants

Background: Forefoot varus is a common component of flatfoot deformity that is often surgically addressed. Multiple options exist to plantarflex the medial column, with midfoot fusion and the Cotton osteotomy being the most common. This study analyzes radiographic outcomes and complications when a titanium wedge is used for structural support in a dorsal opening wedge Cotton osteotomy of the medial cuneiform. Methods: Between December 2016 and May 2018, 32 feet in 31 patients were treated with medial column titanium wedges for residual forefoot varus in association with flatfoot corrections. All participants had preoperative and weight-bearing postoperative radiographs examined for analysis of radiographic correction. The average age of the patients was 41.1 (range: 12-70). The average follow-up time for patients was 12.2 months (8-24). Results: All radiographic parameters were statistically significantly improved from preoperative to postoperative ( P < .05). There were no instances of nonunion of the medial cuneiform osteotomy. There was 1 implant that loosened and was revised to a larger implant that healed uneventfully. No wedges were removed for continued pain at the osteotomy site. Conclusion: This study suggests that metal wedges are both safe and effective for use in medial column correction based on early follow-up data. Future studies comparing titanium wedges versus traditional bone grafting for Cotton osteotomies may provide further analysis of radiographic correction, operative time, procedure cost, and outcomes. There were no instances of pain over the titanium wedge site. Radiographic outcomes are similar to those reported for opening wedge Cotton osteotomies including bone grafting and wedge plates with screws. Future studies will help determine the long-term maintenance of correction and hardware survivorship. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Medial Cuneiform Opening Wedge Osteotomy for Correction of Flexible Flatfoot Deformity: Trabecular Titanium vs. Bone Allograft Wedges

Adult flatfoot is a common pathology characterized by multiplanar deformity involving hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot. Various surgical techniques have been described for the treatment but may not adequately correct the fixed forefoot varus component. Residual forefoot supination can be addressed by a plantar flexing opening wedge osteotomy of the medial cuneiform, also known as a Cotton osteotomy. Thus, the aims of this study were to compare clinical, radiological, and functional outcome after Cotton osteotomy, in patients treated with bone allograft or metallic implant. Consequently, 36 patients treated with opening wedge osteotomy of the medial cuneiform for forefoot varus were studied retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: the bone allograft group (HBG) (n=18) and the metallic implant group with BIOFOAM® Cotton Wedges (TTW) (n=18). Radiographic assessment and clinical scores including American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score, Foot Function Index, and visual analogue scale for pain were collected before operation and the last follow-up. The difference between baseline and follow-up for both groups was statistically significant for all the clinical scores and radiographic angles (p < 0.05). Most participants (92%) were very satisfied after surgery. Our results showed that Cotton osteotomy with a metallic implant provided both good clinical and radiographic outcomes comparable with bone allograft.