medial cuneiform
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

202
(FIVE YEARS 67)

H-INDEX

22
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pir Abdul Ahad Qureshi
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-258
Author(s):  
Kevin Dibbern ◽  
Hunter Briggs ◽  
Andrew Behrens ◽  
Lily McGettigan ◽  
Kepler Alencar Mendes de Carvalho ◽  
...  

Objective: To assess interobserver reliability of previously described coronal plane rotation measurements of medial column bones and to assess their ability to accurately quantify changes in rotational profile. Methods: Two cadaveric below-knee specimens were implanted with pins in each bone of the medial column. Weight-bearing computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired in a simulated standing position under neutral, supinated, and pronated conditions. For each specimen and condition, 2 observers measured the coronal plane rotation of the navicular, medial cuneiform, first metatarsal base, shaft, and head, and proximal phalanx of the hallux as previously described. The rotation of each pin was measured relative to the ground in the coronal plane for each condition. These measurements were defined as benchmarks for the rotational profile of each bone. The correlation between these benchmarks and direct bone measurements was then assessed. Intraclass correlation coeficiente was used to assess interobserver reliability. Pearson’s coefficient was used to evaluate correlations. Results: The interobserver reliability of direct bone measurements ranged from 0.98 to 0.99. Correlations between pin rotation and direct measurements ranged from ρ=0.87 to 0.99 across the neutral, supinated, and pronated conditions. Conclusion: Coronal plane rotation measurements of medial column bones described in this study are reliable tools. Level of Evidence III; Case-Control Study.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 263502542110428
Author(s):  
Steven R. Dayton ◽  
Kurt M. Krautmann ◽  
Michael J. Boctor ◽  
Vehniah K. Tjong ◽  
Anish R. Kadakia

Background: Lisfranc injuries encompass a spectrum of injuries to the tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint complex from ligamentous sprains to fractures with dislocation. While studies have shown it is possible to return to sport (RTS) after low-energy injuries, no literature exists demonstrating RTS after homolateral fracture/dislocation of all 5 metatarsals. Indications: We present a novel technique for repair of homolateral Lisfranc fracture/dislocation of metatarsals 1-5 which may be used in high-level athletes attempting to return to competition. Technique Description: A dual approach is utilized, with a dorsal approach to allow for fusion of the 2nd and 3rd TMT joints and medial approach for internal bracing of the 1st TMT joint. The 2nd and 3rd metatarsals were denuded of all cartilage and the fusion site was fully prepared. Rigid fixation was applied to the fusion sites and then stability of the 1st TMT was reassessed. A guidewire for the cannulated InternalBrace (Arthrex; Naples, FL) system is initially inserted into the base of the 1st metatarsal. Positioning is confirmed with fluoroscopic imaging and the 3.4 mm drill is passed over the wire, followed by the cannulated tap. A 4.75 mm SwiveLock anchor (Arthrex; Naples, FL) with FiberTape suture (Arthrex; Naples, FL) is then inserted into the metatarsal base. The guidewire is placed in a reciprocating position on the medial cuneiform. The 2.7 mm drill is passed over the wire, followed by the 3.5 mm tap. A 3.5 mm SwiveLock anchor is then loaded with the FiberTape suture from the 1st metatarsal. Tensioning is performed, and the 3.5 mm SwiveLock anchor is inserted into the medial cuneiform. Results: The athlete was cleared to return to full competition 9 months following surgery. Physical examination demonstrated stability in dorsiflexion and abduction. Both weight-bearing x-rays and computed tomography scans showed no evidence of hardware failure, no instability of the 1st TMT joint, and solid fusion of the 2nd and 3rd TMT joints. Discussion/Conclusion: Current literature demonstrates that RTS is possible for athletes suffering from low-energy Lisfranc injuries. This novel surgical technique is the first to demonstrate return to sport of a high-level athlete from homolateral fracture/dislocation of all 5 metatarsals.


Author(s):  
Waleed Saqer ◽  
Atul Bandi ◽  
Salman Hasan ◽  
Maged Mostafa ◽  
Ahmed Refaat Khamis

<p>Accessory ossicles of the foot are not uncommon finding in foot radiographs which has confused radiologists and orthopedic surgeons from time immemorial. Occasionally these bones are symptomatic, hindering daily activities of patients. We present a case report of an eleven years old girl with a symptomatic accessory medial cuneiform on the dorsal aspect of left foot. The child was evaluated radiologically and after a trial of failed conservative treatment, she was operated upon. Intraoperatively a superficial nerve on dorsum of this accessory ossicle was found, and the extra bone was excised. This accessory bone was found to be related to medial cuneiform bone at its dorsal and distal surface making to suggest its name as "Os cuneo-I metatarsale-I dorsale". Detailed radiological evaluation is mandatory for identification and exact anatomical localization of the extra bone before proceeding to excision, when non operative treatment fails to relieve the symptoms.</p><p><strong> </strong></p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3684
Author(s):  
Nicol Zielinska ◽  
Richard Shane Tubbs ◽  
Friedrich Paulsen ◽  
Bartłomiej Szewczyk ◽  
Michał Podgórski ◽  
...  

The tibialis anterior muscle originates on the lateral condyle of the tibia, on the upper two-thirds of the lateral surface of this bone, on the anterior surface of the interosseous membrane and on the deep surface of the fascia cruris. The distal attachment is typically at the medial cuneiform and first metatarsal. However, the tibialis anterior tendon can vary morphologically in both adults and fetuses. Different authors have created new classification systems for it. The main aim of this review is to present condensed information about the tibialis anterior tendon based on the available literature. Another aim is to compare classification systems and the results of previous studies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 118-123
Author(s):  
ALESSIO BERNASCONI ◽  
CESAR DE CESAR NETTO ◽  
LAUREN ROBERTS ◽  
FRANÇOIS LINTZ ◽  
ALEXANDRE LEME GODOY-SANTOS ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: Our aim was to describe the foot alignment in National Football League (NFL) players with different symptomatic foot and ankle pathologies using weightbearing cone-beam computed tomography (WBCBCT), comparing them to normally aligned feet as control group. Methods: 41 feet (36 active NFL players) were assessed using WBCBCT and compared to 20 normally aligned controls from a normal population. Measurements included: Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO); Calcaneal Offset (CO); Hindfoot Alignment Angle (HAA); angle between inferior and superior facets of the talus (Inftal-Suptal); angle between inferior facet of the talus and the horizontal/floor (Inftal-Hor); Forefoot Arch Angle (FAA); navicular- and medial cuneiform-to-floor distance. Results: NFL athletes showed a neutrally aligned hindfoot when compared to controls (FAO: 1% vs 0.5%; CO: 2.3 mm vs 0.8 mm; HAA: 2.9° vs 0.8° in two groups, with all p > 0.05) and a normal morphology of the subtalar joint (no difference in Inftal-Suptal and Inftal-Hor angles). Conversely, in athletes we found a decreased medial longitudinal arch (FAA: 15° vs 18.3°, p = 0.03) with smaller navicular (38.2 mm vs 42.2 mm, p = 0.03) and medial cuneiform (27 mm vs 31.3 mm, p = 0.01) mean distances to the floor when compared to controls. Conclusion: In our series, NFL players presented a lower medial longitudinal arch than controls but a neutrally aligned hindfoot. WBCBCT may help shed light on anatomical risk factors for injuries in professional players. Level of Evidence III, Retrospective comparative study.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Laliotis ◽  
Chrysanthos Chrysanthou ◽  
Panagiotis Konstandinidis ◽  
Elisavet Papadopoulou

Introduction: Solitary osteochondromas are extremely rare in the bones of the foot. In the growing skeleton, few cases affecting the metatarsals and the talus have been reported. At present, there have been no reports of osteochondromas affecting the cuneiforms. Case Report: We report the case of a 13-year-old male patient. He presented with marked prominences in the plantar surface of his left foot and pain while participating in sporting activities. Radiological examination with X-rays, computed tomography (CT) scan, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed two solitary osteochondromas growing from the medial cuneiform and the head of the 1st metatarsal. The patient was treated surgically by excision of the osteochondromas. Histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of osteochondromas. He had an uneventful recovery and returned to his sporting activities. Conclusion: Solitary osteochondroma can present in the cuneiform and metatarsal of a growing adolescent. CT scan is useful for the accurate diagnosis and surgical removal of the tumor. Keywords: Osteochondroma, foot, metatarsal, cuneiform, child.


2021 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lance M. Mabry ◽  
Taylor N. Patti ◽  
Michael D. Ross ◽  
Chris M. Bleakley ◽  
Angela S. Gisselman

Background Isolated medial cuneiform fracture is a rare but diagnostically challenging condition. Diagnostic delay in these cases may lead to delays in ideal treatment approaches and prolonged symptoms. An understanding of clinical presentation is needed to expedite diagnosis, facilitate decision making, and guide treatment approach. Methods Case studies/series were searched in four databases until September 2019. Included studies had participants with a history of traumatic closed medial cuneiform fracture. Studies were excluded if the medial cuneiform fractures were open fractures, associated with multitrauma, or associated with dislocation/Lisfranc injury. Three blinded reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the studies, and a qualitative synthesis was performed. Results Ten studies comprising 15 patients were identified. Mean ± SD patient age was 38.0 ± 12.8 years, with 86.7% of reported participants being men. The overall methodological quality was moderate to high, and reporting of the patient selection criteria was poor overall. The most commonly reported clinical symptoms were localized tenderness (60.0%) and edema (53.3%). Direct blow was the most common inciting trauma (46.2%), followed by axial load (30.8%) and avulsion injuries (23.1%). Baseline radiographs were occult in 72.7% of patients; magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography were the most common diagnostic modalities. Mean ± SD diagnostic delay was 64.7 ± 89.6 days. Conservative management was pursued in 54.5% of patients, with reported resolution of symptoms in 3 to 6 months. Surgical intervention occurred in 45.5% of patients and resulted in functional restoration in 3 to 6 months in all but one patient. Conclusions Initial radiographs for isolated medial cuneiform fractures are frequently occult. Due to expedience and relatively low cost, radiographs are still a viable first-line imaging modality. If clinical concern remains, magnetic resonance imaging may be pursued to minimize diagnostic delay. Conservative management is a viable treatment method, with expected return to full function in 3 to 6 months.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document