Relationship between ankle varus moment during gait and radiographic measurements in patients with medial ankle osteoarthritis

Background Kinetic data obtained during gait can be used to clarify the biomechanical pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the lower extremity. This study aimed to investigate the difference in ankle varus moment between the varus angulation and medial translation types of medial ankle osteoarthritis, and to identify the radiographic measurements associated with ankle varus moment. Methods Twenty-four consecutive patients [mean age 65.8 (SD) 8.0 years; 9 men and 15 women] with medial ankle osteoarthritis were included. Fourteen and 10 patients had the varus angulation (tibiotalar tilt angle≥3 degrees) and medial translation (tibiotalar tilt angle<3 degrees) types, respectively. All patients underwent three-dimensional gait analysis, and the maximum varus moment of the ankle was recorded. Radiographic measurement included tibial plafond inclination, tibiotalar tilt angle, talar dome inclination, and lateral talo-first metatarsal angle. Comparison between the two types of medial ankle osteoarthritis and the relationship between the maximum ankle varus moment and radiographic measurements were analyzed. Results The mean tibial plafond inclination, tibiotalar tilt angle, talar dome inclination, lateral talo-first metatarsal angle, and maximum ankle varus moment were 6.4 degrees (SD 3.3 degrees), 5.0 degrees (SD 4.6 degrees), 11.4 degrees (SD 5.2 degrees), -6.5 degrees (SD 11.7 degrees), and 0.185 (SD 0.082) Nm/kg, respectively. The varus angulation type showed a greater maximum ankle varus moment than the medial translation type (p = .005). The lateral talo-first metatarsal angle was significantly associated with the maximum ankle varus moment (p = .041) in the multiple regression analysis. Conclusion The varus angulation type of medial ankle osteoarthritis is considered to be more imbalanced biomechanically than the medial displacement type. The lateral talo-first metatarsal angle, being significantly associated with the ankle varus moment, should be considered for correction during motion-preserving surgeries for medial ankle osteoarthritis to restore the biomechanical balance of the ankle.

To Study Surgical Management of Distal Femoral Fractures & its Complication

Background: Fractures of distal end of femur are complex injuries which are difficult to manage. These fractures often are unstable and comminuted. Despite advances in surgical techniques and improvement in implants, treatment of distal femoral fractures remains a challenge in many situations. This study was done to analyse the functional outcome and this management of distal femoral fractures with its complication. Material & Methods: This study has been done between August 2008 to March 2010 on patients coming to Orthopaedics Department at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital and Research Centre, Bhilai. It is a prospective study which includes 25 patients with 10 Type A, 7 Type B and 8 Type C fractures of distal femur after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Mean age of 47.08 years with sex incidence of 3.17:1(M:F). Mode of injury was RTA in 16, simple fall in 6, fall from height in 2 and railway track accident in 1 patient. There were 5-A1, 1-A2, 4-A3, 3-B1, 1-B2, 3-B3, 1-C1, 4-C2 and 3-C3 fractures. Complication in form of varus angulation was found in 5 cases, shortening occurred in 2 patients, backing out of distal femoral locking screw occurred in 1 patient. Deep infection occurred in 1 patient. Implant failure and varus angulation at fracture site occurred in 1 patient. Conclusion: We conclude that minimally invasive surgical techniques and with the availability of locking type of plates distal femoral fractures can now be dealt with more precessions and more satisfactory results can be produced. Keywords: Complication, Muller Classification, Management, Femoral fractures.

Analysis of the subcapital two-part humerus fracture by fluoroscopy: objective criteria for classification and decision making

Background Surgical decision making in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFx) is primarily based on fracture classification using standard radiographs. Due to the lack of objective criteria, this classification process is associated with high interobserver variation. In this study, we investigate the fluoroscopic analysis of humerus fractures through the surgical neck using a semi-quantitative determination of distinct angulation patterns of the proximal humerus as they appear in the image intensifier. Methods Using a saw bone model, defined subcapital 2-part fracture configurations were generated and assessed radiographically. Anatomical landmarks—including the greater and lesser tuberosity as well as anatomical neck—were identified using an image converter, and the exact degree of fracture displacement with 10° up to 70° (in 10° increments) of posterior, varus or combined posterior-varus angulation was compared to nondisplaced controls. From the resultant series of radiographs, the appearance of these angulations in anteroposterior (AP) and scapular Y-views were also visualized and defined. Results An angulation of 50° or more of any given 2-part fracture through the surgical neck is present when the greater tuberosity becomes the most proximal point in AP view (varus and combined posterior-varus angulation) or a bimodal form is found for the superior contour of the head with the lesser tuberosity being the most proximal point in the Y-view (posterior angulation). Conclusion The radiological appearance of various PHFx constellations can be well visualized using the saw bone shoulder model. The presence of angulation in accordance with the Neer classification for group III fractures can be adequately determined by analyzing the relative position of the greater or lesser tuberosity to the humeral head calotte. This can assist the surgeon’s decision on whether to operate or opt for a conservative approach. Level of evidence Basic Science, Anatomy Study, Imaging.

Radiographic differences in the concomitant deformities in two types of medial ankle osteoarthritis

Objectives Motion preserving surgeries could be unsuccessful because of underestimation of deformities of the foot and knee in ankle osteoarthritis. This study aimed to investigate the concomitant deformities in medial ankle osteoarthritis and the difference between the two types, varus angulation and medial translation. Methods A retrospective study was conducted using medical records and radiographic data. Patients with medial ankle osteoarthritis that underwent weight-bearing X ray imaging and radiographic measurements including tibial plafond inclination (TPI), tibiotalar tilt angle (TT), lateral talo-first metatarsal angle, naviculo-cuboid overlap, and mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA) were studied. The patients were categorized into two groups, the varus angulation group (TT ≥4°) and medial translation group (TT <4°). The radiographic measurements were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 102 patients (male = 44; female = 58) were included; the mean age was 64.9 years (SD 8.3 years). The varus rotation group (N = 66) showed a significantly smaller lateral talo-first metatarsal angle (p<0.001), naviculo-cuboid overlap (p<0.001), and mTFA (p = 0.019) compared to the medial displacement group (N = 36). The TT showed a significant correlation with lateral talo-first metatarsal angle (r = -0.520, p<0.001), naviculo-cuboid overlap (r = -0.501, p<0.001), and mTFA (r = -0.243, p = 0.014). Lateral talo-first metatarsal angle was found to be the significant factor (p = 0.018) discriminating varus angulation and medial translation types in the binary logistic analysis. Conclusions Varus angulation of the ankle was correlated with knee alignment and foot deformity. Radiographic indices were different between the varus angulation and medial translation groups. The role of concomitant deformities needs to be further investigated in terms of a causal relationship. Surgeons need to pay attention to concomitant deformities in the treatment of medial ankle osteoarthritis.

Consensus on Indications for Medial Cuneiform Opening Wedge (Cotton) Osteotomy in the Treatment of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity

Recommendation: Forefoot varus is a physical and radiographic examination finding associated with the Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD). Varus position of the forefoot relative to the hindfoot is caused by medial midfoot collapse with apex plantar angulation of the medial column. Some surgeons use the term forefoot supination to describe this same deformity (see Introduction section with nomenclature). Correction of this deformity is important to restore the weightbearing tripod of the foot and help resist a recurrence of foot collapse. When the forefoot varus deformity is isolated to the medial metatarsal and medial cuneiform, correction is indicated with an opening wedge medial cuneiform (Cotton) osteotomy, typically with interposition of an allograft bone wedge from 5 to 11 mm in width at the base. When the forefoot varus is global, involving varus angulation of the entire forefoot and midfoot relative to the hindfoot, other procedures are needed to adequately correct the deformity. Level of Evidence: Level V, consensus, expert opinion.

How to improve the outcomes of surgically treated proximal humeral osteoporotic fractures? A narrative review

Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) are the third most common non-vertebral fragility fractures after hip and distal radius. It still controversial which treatment might be more appropriate, and surgically treated outcomes depends also on an appropriate technique. In order to clarify surgical indications, tips and pitfall a narrative review was conducted. Pinning, external fixation, plating and internal fixators has each one its advantages and disadvantages. During the procedure an appropriate use of the fixation device and handling of the soft tissue might be associated with better outcomes. Calcar comminution, varus angulation, medial dislocation of the shaft, fracture-dislocation are factors that could lead to choose a replacement. Hemiarthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are the most common prosthesis used in PHF. The restoration of humeral length and tuberosities might lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes and prosthesis survivorship.

Anterior-Posterior (AP) Calcaneal Profile View: A Novel Radiographic Image to Assess Varus Malalignment

Background: Assessing and correcting malalignment is important when treating calcaneus fractures. The Harris axial view is commonly utilized to assess varus deformity but may be inherently inaccurate due to its tangential nature. The anterior-posterior (AP) calcaneal profile view is a novel radiographic view that is easily obtained with demonstrated increased accuracy for assessing calcaneal axial alignment. Methods: Five nonpaired ankle cadaveric specimens were used in this investigation. Oblique osteotomies were created in relation to the long axis, and varus deformities were produced by inserting solid radiolucent wedges into the osteotomies to create models of 10, 20, and 30 degrees of angulation of the calcaneal tuberosity. Specimens were imaged using both the Harris axial view and the AP calcaneal profile view. Results: For cadavers with 10 degrees of actual varus angulation, the mean Harris axial view angle and the AP calcaneal profile view angle were 10.9 ± 4.8 (range, 5.5-16.0) degrees and 13.0 ± 5.5 (range, 7.3-20.9) degrees, respectively. For cadavers with 20 degrees of actual varus angulation, the mean Harris view angle and the AP calcaneal profile view angle were 11.5 ± 2 (range, 8.2-13.6) degrees and 18.1 ± 4.8 (range, 11.7-23.5) degrees, respectively ( P = .005). On pairwise comparison with Bonferroni correction, there was a significant difference between the Harris axial view angle and both the AP calcaneal profile view angle ( P = .012) and actual angulation ( P = .011). For cadavers with 30 degrees of actual varus angulation, the mean Harris axial view angle and the AP calcaneal profile view angle were 18.3 ± 4.3 (range, 13.3-23.6) degrees and 28.3 ± 2.9 (range, 24.4-31.1) degrees, respectively ( P < .001). On pairwise comparison with Bonferroni correction, there was a significant difference between the Harris axial view angle and both the AP calcaneal profile view angle ( P = .001) and actual angulation ( P < .001). There was no significant difference between the AP calcaneal profile view angle and actual angulation ( P > .999). Conclusion: The AP calcaneal profile view is a novel radiographic view that is easily obtained with demonstrated increased accuracy for assessing calcaneal axial alignment. While both views demonstrated similar measurement error for lesser degrees of varus malalignment, the AP calcaneal profile view demonstrated more accurate measurement of increasing heel varus compared with the Harris view. Clinical Relevance: The AP calcaneal profile view could be used in addition to other radiographic views when treating displaced, intra-articular calcaneus fractures to help optimize correction of hindfoot alignment.

Bone grafting of the regenerate: a previously undescribed case and surgical technique

<p>Distraction osteogenesis can occasionally be complicated with poor-quality regenerated bone. Several factors have been identified in the literature in order to reinforce the maturation of the regenerate. We would like to present a case in a 40 years old patient who presented with shortening and uniplanar varus angulation at his proximal tibia. The patient was treated with distraction osteogenesis using a circular frame. He had significant delay in the maturation of the 4-5 cm gap, and it was decided to use a non-vascularized fibular graft that was introduced using the tibial intramedullary nailing instrumentation. The graft led to an impressive acceleration of the maturation of the regenerate, mostly posteriorly and laterally with poor progression at the anterior part of the tibia. As this is the first such case presented in the international literature it is difficult to speculate why the regenerate was stimulated only in specific areas. Further reporting is necessary to reach safe conclusions.</p>

BLOUNT DISEASE EVALUATION OF THE OPERATIVE TREATMENT WITHIN 2006-2014 IN DR. SOETOMO GENERAL HOSPITAL SURABAYA

Background: Blount disease is a growth disturbance of the medial side of the proximal physeal of the tibia, epiphyseal and metaphyseal. Clinically this disease marked by varus angulation and internal rotation of the tibia on the metaphyseal area below knee.Method: This paper evaluating 2 cases of blount disease treated surgically in Soetomo general hospital within 2006 – 2014. The evaluation based on MDA (meta-diaphyseal angle) pre and post operatively.Result: Showed significant and satisfactory to patients and parents who have carried out the operation. A reduction in the angle of MDA, in first patients the MDA angle before surgery was 18 degrees on the right 40 degrees on the left, after surgery MDA was 24 degrees on the right, 10 degrees on the left. The second patient MDA before surgery was 32 degrees on the right and 33 degrees on the left, after the surgery MDA was 12 degrees on the left side, for the right side hasn’t operated yet.Discussion and Conclusion: There is hope for correction on severe form of blount disease. Correction by performing a proximal tibia osteotomy on the affected bone.