binomial data
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

140
(FIVE YEARS 20)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Peter A. Henderson

The steps required during the planning of a sampling campaign are described. The time of sampling within the life-cycle, the size of the sampling unit, number of samples, and distribution of the samples is discussed. Statistical aspects of sample design are introduced, including the normal distribution, the negative binomial distribution and species dispersal, Taylor’s power law, and aggregation indices. Pattern analysis, SADIE spatial analysis, and crowding indices are described. Nearest-neighbour and closest-neighbour techniques to estimate population density are reviewed. Sequential sampling methodologies and software are described. Presence–absence sampling and binomial data analysis are described.


Stat ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric F. Lock ◽  
Dipankar Bandyopadhyay

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 615-626
Author(s):  
Choirun Nisa ◽  
Muhammad Nur Aidi ◽  
I Made Sumertajaya

The negative binomial distribution is one of the data collection counts that focuses on success and failure events. This study conducted a study of the distribution of negative binomial data to determine the characterization of the distribution based on the value of Variance Mean Ratio (VMR). Simulation data are generated based on negative binomial distribution with a combination of p and n parameters. The results of the VMR study on negative binomial distribution simulation data show that the VMR value will be smaller when the p-value is large and the VMR value is more stable as the sample size increases. Simulation data of negative binomial distribution when p≥0.5 begins to change data distribution to the distribution of Poisson and binomial. The calculation VMR value can be used as a reference for detecting patterns of data count distribution.


2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matilda Q. R. Pembury Smith ◽  
Graeme D. Ruxton

Abstract It is not uncommon for researchers to want to interrogate paired binomial data. For example, researchers may want to compare an organism’s response (positive or negative) to two different stimuli. If they apply both stimuli to a sample of individuals, it would be natural to present the data in a 2 × 2 table. There would be two cells with concordant results (the frequency of individuals which responded positively or negatively to both stimuli) and two cells with discordant results (the frequency of individuals who responded positively to one stimulus, but negatively to the other). The key issue is whether the totals in the two discordant cells are sufficiently different to suggest that the stimuli trigger different reactions. In terms of the null hypothesis testing paradigm, this would translate as a P value which is the probability of seeing the observed difference in these two values or a more extreme difference if the two stimuli produced an identical reaction. The statistical test designed to provide this P value is the McNemar test. Here, we seek to promote greater and better use of the McNemar test. To achieve this, we fully describe a range of circumstances within biological research where it can be effectively applied, describe the different variants of the test that exist, explain how these variants can be accessed in R, and offer guidance on which of these variants to adopt. To support our arguments, we highlight key recent methodological advances and compare these with a novel survey of current usage of the test. Significance statement When analysing paired binomial data, researchers appear to reflexively apply a chi-squared test, with the McNemar test being largely overlooked, despite it often being more appropriate. As these tests evaluate a different null hypothesis, selecting the appropriate test is essential for effective analysis. When using the McNemar test, there are four methods that can be applied. Recent advice has outlined clear guidelines on which method should be used. By conducting a survey, we provide support for these guidelines, but identify that the method chosen in publications is rarely specified or the most appropriate. Our study provides clear guidance on which method researchers should select and highlights examples of when this test should be used and how it can be implemented easily to improve future research.


Author(s):  
Ivair R. Silva ◽  
Martin Kulldorff ◽  
W. Katherine Yih

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document