THE CONSTRUCTION OF TERRORISM PREVENTION IN LEGAL POLITICS

Terrorism is a criminal act or extraordinary crime that is of concern to the world today, especially in Indonesia. Terrorism that has occurred in Indonesia recently has ideological, historical and political linkages and is part of the dynamics of the strategic environment at the global and regional levels. the approach method uses normative juridical, the results of the study state that the legal politics of eradicating criminal acts of terrorism in Indonesia is a proactive policy and anticipatory step that is based on prudence and is long-term in nature. The use of Act No. 15 of 2003 to regulate the eradication of criminal acts of terrorism is based on the consideration that the occurrence of terrorism in various places has caused material and immaterial losses and caused insecurity for the community. It can be stated that the government's policy to tackle criminal acts of terrorism is by taking legal steps, so that unwanted things can be anticipated.

Counter-terrorism measures and perceptions of police legitimacy: The importance Muslims place on procedural justice, representative bureaucracy, and bounded-authority concerns

Engaging Muslims in counter-terrorism (CT) has proved challenging for police worldwide. Some research has focussed on the utility of police being procedurally just in their CT strategies to enhance their legitimacy and subsequent cooperation from Muslims. Despite the efficacy of procedural justice, however, some have argued that procedural justice scholarship is too narrowly focussed on how police treat citizens. Citizens’ concerns about police acting within the limits of appropriate power (i.e., “bounded-authority” concerns), as well as representativeness in policing (i.e., “representative bureaucracy”), can also influence citizens’ judgments of police legitimacy. This study explores how, when, and why procedural justice, bounded authority, and representation concerns shape Muslims’ perceptions of police CT measures and police legitimacy. Using focus group data from 104 Australian-Muslims, results revealed that CT measures that include Muslims as partners in terrorism prevention and those that draw on principles of procedural justice were perceived most favourably, and were seen to promote police legitimacy. Measures that were condemned were perceived as bounded-authority violations and damaged police legitimacy. Implications for theory and police practice are discussed.

ANTI-TERRORIST SECURITY OBJECTS (TERRITORIES): CRITICAL UNDERSTANDING IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS

В статье рассматриваются вопросы антитеррористической защищенности объектов (территорий) и отдельных обязательных требований, предъявляемых к антитеррористической защищенности объектов (территорий). Осуществлен критический анализ нормативных правовых актов, посвященных деятельности государственных органов в вопросах противодействия терроризму, включая документы, обязывающие утверждать и реализовывать требования к антитеррористической защищенности объектов (территорий). Особое внимание уделено предупреждению терроризму (профилактике терроризма) и вопросам ответственности за нарушение требований к антитеррористической защищенности объектов (территорий). В результате проведенного анализа сформулированы выводы, на основании которых подготовлены предложения по внесению необходимых, на взгляд авторов, изменений в законодательство Российской Федерации. The article deals with the issues of anti-terrorist protection of objects (territories) and certain mandatory requirements for anti-terrorist protection of objects (territories). A critical analysis of normative legal acts devoted to the activities of state bodies in countering terrorism, including documents obliging to approve and implement requirements for anti-terrorist protection of objects (territories), was carried out. Special attention is paid to the prevention of terrorism (prevention of terrorism) and issues of responsibility for violating the requirements for anti-terrorist protection of objects (territories). As a result of the analysis, conclusions are formulated, on the basis of which proposals are prepared for making the necessary, in the opinion of the authors, changes to the legislation of the Russian Federation.

Implementation of the Cyber Terrorism Prevention, and Rehabilitation Policy in Polda Metro Jaya Police in Central Jakarta

Crimes of terrorism are not only done through the internet, but can also be done through networks that can send signals such as telephone communications. By implementing a cyber terrorism policy at the police, terrorism cases will decrease every year. The implementation of this policy helps to overcome the problem of terrorism in Indonesia.

Weaponisation of the war on terror and the sidestepping of human rights norms: Seeking a balance between the terrorism (prevention) (amendment) act 2013 and Nigeria’s obligation under international human rights law

In an era of escalation in terrorism and terrorist related criminalities, the international system continues to innovate on how best to contain its scourge, particularly within the confines of established democratic norms. As a response to Security Council resolution 1373 adopted on 28 September 2001, United Nations (UN) member states began to craft domestic counterterrorism legislations to criminalise terrorist activities on their home-soil, as well as extraterritorially. Responding as other nations, Nigeria enacted the Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act 2013. However, the Act and others like it, have thrown up troubling questions about weaponization of the war on terror, and the need to balance the war with the protection of human rights. This article examines the continued sidestepping of human rights norms in the war against terror. It presents this conflict within the context of Nigeria’s domestic counterterrorism law, highlighting some dangerous provisions in the Act which directly impugns on its obligation under International Human Rights Law (IHRL). It advocates an urgent review in the Act that will reflect the current mood of the UN human rights system, as well as the country’s obligation under IHRL

Geographien des Ein- und Ausschlusses: Strafvollzug und -prozesse im Kontext der Aufarbeitung von Beteiligungshandlungen im syrischen Bürgerkrieg

Based on an ethnographic study of anti-terror trials at higher regional appeal courts in Germany, conducted in 2015–2020, this article examines the interrelation between the German penal system and criminal trials as mutually constitutive, governmentally guided, and highly secured elements of a state-induced and Islam-centred terrorism prevention. This includes the physical nature of the courthouses, as well as discourses of risk inscribed within them, which are linked to corresponding racialized and gender-rendered readings of the ‚need for custody‘. Under the auspices of a ‚new penology‘ and legitimized as an elimination of ‚state-endangering actions‘, two logics emerge in the course of these proceedings that emphasize either a ‚rectification of the reformable‘ or a ‚confinement of the incorrigible‘, illustrating how a reshaped field of crime control and criminal justice can currently be observed that makes permanent incarceration the guarantor of a promise of security.