anorectal anomalies
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

129
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Abdelhamid AbouZeid ◽  
Shaimaa Abdelsattar Mohammad ◽  
Sherif Elhussiny Ibrahim ◽  
Leila Rawash ElDieb

Abstract Background Classifying anorectal anomalies (ARA) has always been a matter of debate among pediatric surgeons. A new classification does not necessarily imply discarding older ones. Several concepts have been introduced in the past and stood the test of time being still valid up till now In this report, we present our experience in managing a group of boys with ARA by PSARP. We have tried to enhance the current classification to include information about the level of the rectum in relation to sacrum, not just the location of the fistula. Results The study included 62 consecutive male patients with anorectal anomalies who underwent PSARP between 2009 and 2019. Included cases were either recto-bulbar fistula (21 cases), recto-prostatic fistula (30 cases), or imperforate anus without fistula (11 cases). Their age at operation ranged from 3 to 36 months (mean 7.8 months). Cases with recto-prostatic fistula were further subclassified according to the level of distal rectum into two subgroups: (type 1) those with the rectum ending opposite the level of S4/S5, and (type 2) those with the rectum ending at a higher level opposite S3. The PSARP procedure proved to be a successful surgical approach to reach, separate, and mobilize the rectum in all cases of recto-bulbar fistula, imperforate anus without fistula, and recto-prostatic fistula type (1). In cases of recto-prostatic fistula type (2), the perineal approach (PSARP) failed to reach and mobilize the rectum in two out of the eleven cases. Conclusion In management of anorectal anomalies, the sacrum can provide two important indicators: a prognostic value for continence, and anatomical landmark to stratify the level of distal rectum in the pelvis which is crucial for planning the best surgical approach.



Author(s):  
Amr Abdelhamid AbouZeid ◽  
Moustafa Mohamed Bayoumi ◽  
Mona M Abo El-Ela


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Braz ◽  
A Machado ◽  
J Santos ◽  
C Lacerda ◽  
C Didellet ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Prenatal exposure to environmental risk factors are one of the known causes of congenital anomalies (CA). In 2015, a cluster of anorectal anomalies, a rare malformation, in Setúbal district raised interest in researchers. The aim of study was to assess the impact of prenatal exposure of the mothers on the occurrence of CA in the offspring. Methods A Case-control study (1:2) was implemented between 2016-2019. Newborns with CA (cases) and newborns without CA (controls) are identified and recruited. Parents were personally interviewed by a health professional using a standardized questionnaire. A descriptive analyses was performed and cases and controls were described based on maternal residence during pregnancy. Chi-square test was used to compare cases and controls. Results 97 cases and 194 controls were identified. There was a male predominance in the case group (60 vs. 34) and no difference in gestational age between case and control groups. The mean birth weight was similar (3115g in cases vs. 3221g in controls). There was no difference related to mean mother's age nor the presence of maternal chronic disease. Smoking had more expression in the case group (21,2% vs. 16,3%). Moita (37,8%) is the municipality with higher frequency of cases. Musculoskeletal anomalies were the most frequent (35.4%), followed by genital (22.2%) and other anomalies (11%). During the study period, five cases with anorectal anomalies were reported, 4 of them born at 2016 and in 3 the mothers residence place was Moita. Conclusions In this study, the high proportion of cases from Moita suggests a possible environmental exposure to a teratogenic agent. Also smoking during pregnancy could be a high risk to anorectal anomalies, as suggested in other studies. More investment in public health measures could protect population from harmful environments. Key messages Pprenatal exposure to environemental risk factors increase the risk of congenital anomalies. Mothers residence and place of work could be a risk factor to pregnancy.



Author(s):  
Geri Hewitt ◽  
Daniel G. DaJusta ◽  
Christina B. Ching
Keyword(s):  


Author(s):  
Alberto Peña ◽  
Andrea Bischoff ◽  
Marc A. Levitt
Keyword(s):  


Author(s):  
Claude Stoll ◽  
Beatrice Dott ◽  
Yves Alembik ◽  
Marie‐Paule Roth


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 140-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayman M. Allam ◽  
Amr A. Abou Zeid ◽  
Ihab El Shafei ◽  
Wael Ghanem ◽  
Ayman Albaghdady


Author(s):  
Grenville Fox ◽  
Nicholas Hoque ◽  
Timothy Watts

This chapter describes the presentation, investigation, and management of congenital and acquired gastrointestinal problems. It begins with a symptom-based approach giving differential diagnoses for vomiting, haematemesis, bloody stools, and diarrhoea. All common congenital problems are covered including oesophageal atresia, tracheo-oesophageal fistula, intestinal atresia, exomphalos, gastroschisis, malrotation, volvulus, meconium ileus, Hirschsprung’s disease, and anorectal anomalies. There are several pages devoted to necrotizing enterocolitis. Throughout there is a description of the surgical management of relevant conditions.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document