spinal pathways
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

152
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

32
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor S. Barss ◽  
David F. Collins ◽  
Dylan Miller ◽  
Amit N. Pujari

The use of upper limb vibration (ULV) during exercise and rehabilitation continues to gain popularity as a modality to improve function and performance. Currently, a lack of knowledge of the pathways being altered during ULV limits its effective implementation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether indirect ULV modulates transmission along spinal and corticospinal pathways that control the human forearm. All measures were assessed under CONTROL (no vibration) and ULV (30 Hz; 0.4 mm displacement) conditions while participants maintained a small contraction of the right flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle. To assess spinal pathways, Hoffmann reflexes (H-reflexes) elicited by stimulation of the median nerve were recorded from FCR with motor response (M-wave) amplitudes matched between conditions. An H-reflex conditioning paradigm was also used to assess changes in presynaptic inhibition by stimulating the superficial radial (SR) nerve (5 pulses at 300Hz) 37 ms prior to median nerve stimulation. Cutaneous reflexes in FCR elicited by stimulation of the SR nerve at the wrist were also recorded. To assess corticospinal pathways, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralateral motor cortex were recorded from the right FCR and biceps brachii (BB). ULV significantly reduced H-reflex amplitude by 15.7% for both conditioned and unconditioned reflexes (24.0 ± 15.7 vs. 18.4 ± 11.2% Mmax; p < 0.05). Middle latency cutaneous reflexes were also significantly reduced by 20.0% from CONTROL (−1.50 ± 2.1% Mmax) to ULV (−1.73 ± 2.2% Mmax; p < 0.05). There was no significant effect of ULV on MEP amplitude (p > 0.05). Therefore, ULV inhibits cutaneous and H-reflex transmission without influencing corticospinal excitability of the forearm flexors suggesting increased presynaptic inhibition of afferent transmission as a likely mechanism. A general increase in inhibition of spinal pathways with ULV may have important implications for improving rehabilitation for individuals with spasticity (SCI, stroke, MS, etc.).


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 578
Author(s):  
Seungwon Choi ◽  
Junichi Hachisuka ◽  
Matthew Brett ◽  
Alexandra Magee ◽  
H. Koerber ◽  
...  

Nature ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 587 (7833) ◽  
pp. 258-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seungwon Choi ◽  
Junichi Hachisuka ◽  
Matthew A. Brett ◽  
Alexandra R. Magee ◽  
Yu Omori ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor S. Barss ◽  
David F. Collins ◽  
Dylan Miller ◽  
Amit N. Pujari

AbstractThe aim of this study was to investigate whether indirect upper limb vibration (ULV) modulates transmission along spinal and corticospinal pathways that control the human forearm. All measures were assessed under CONTROL (no vibration) and ULV (30 Hz; 0.4 mm displacement) conditions while participants maintained a small contraction of the right flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle. To assess spinal pathways, Hoffmann reflexes (H-reflexes) elicited by stimulation of the median nerve were recorded from FCR with motor response (M-wave) amplitudes matched between conditions. An H-reflex conditioning paradigm was also used to assess changes in presynaptic inhibition by stimulating the superficial radial (SR) nerve (5 pulses at 300Hz) 37 ms prior to median nerve stimulation. Cutaneous reflexes in FCR elicited by stimulation of the SR nerve at the wrist were also recorded. To assess corticospinal pathways, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralateral motor cortex were recorded from the right FCR and biceps brachii (BB). ULV significantly reduced H-reflex amplitude by 15.7% for both conditioned and unconditioned reflexes (24.0±15.7 vs 18.4±11.2 % Mmax; p<0.05). Middle latency cutaneous reflexes were also significantly reduced by 20.0% from CONTROL (−1.50 ± 2.1 % Mmax) to ULV (−1.73 ± 2.2 % Mmax; p<0.05). There was no significant effect of ULV on MEP amplitude (p>0.05). Therefore, ULV inhibits cutaneous and H-reflex transmission without influencing corticospinal excitability of the forearm flexors suggesting increased presynaptic inhibition of afferent transmission as a likely mechanism. A general increase in inhibition of spinal pathways with ULV may have important implications for improving rehabilitation for individuals with spasticity (SCI, stroke, MS, etc).


MedEdPublish ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Asim Javaid ◽  
Harriet Schellekens ◽  
John F. Cryan ◽  
Andre Toulouse

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suchan Chang ◽  
Yeonhee Ryu ◽  
Young Seob Gwak ◽  
Nam Jun Kim ◽  
Jin Mook Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document