oncology drug
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

422
(FIVE YEARS 114)

H-INDEX

28
(FIVE YEARS 5)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasha Thomson ◽  
Louis Everest ◽  
Noah Witzke ◽  
Tina Jiao ◽  
Seanthel Delos Santos ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nataliia Beztsinna ◽  
Fanny Grillet ◽  
Niels Meesters ◽  
Donny van der Meer ◽  
Lidia Daszkiewicz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 99-99
Author(s):  
Richard Gagnon ◽  
Chelsea Wong ◽  
Eddy Taguedong ◽  
Parthiv Maneesh ◽  
Safiya Karim ◽  
...  

99 Background: New oncology drugs undergo detailed review of clinical, economic, and patient data. Thoroughly assessing these data can require lengthy review processes, in the absence of accelerated approval pathways. The aim of this study was to assess how cancer drug review times impact public funding recommendations. Methods: Drugs reviewed by Canada’s health technology assessment body, the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR), from April 2012 to November 2020 were included in this study. Data was collected including Health Canada approval date, initial and final funding recommendations, treatment intent, drug class, clinical indication (tumour type) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to determine the association between funding recommendations and review times. Results: Of the 227 applications submitted to pCODR, 168 had received positive funding recommendations. Amongst the total drug applications, 24 (14.3%) drugs were intended for the treatment of thoracic cancers, 19 (11.3%) for gastrointestinal cancers, 17 (10.1%) for genitourinary cancers, 17 (10.1%) for breast cancer, and 91 (54.2%) for other tumour sites. Median time from pCODR submission to final recommendation was longer for drugs indicated for the treatment of lung and breast cancer compared to those indicated for treatment of other tumours (223 vs. 212 vs. 203 days, respectively; Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.0322). Drugs with longer review times were more likely to receive a negative pCODR recommendation, even when adjusting for ICER (157 vs 298 days, Wilcoxon p-value = 0.0003). There was no association between positive or negative funding recommendation and tumour type. Conclusions: Oncology drugs with longer review times are less likely to receive recommendation for public funding in Canada. Addressing factors contributing to variance in review times and standardizing the review process can ensure equitable access to cancer drugs.


Author(s):  
Begoña Heras ◽  
Dalila Bouyoucef‐Cherchalli ◽  
Lesley Reeve ◽  
Andreas Reichl ◽  
Debra Mandarino ◽  
...  

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Jenei ◽  
Daniel E. Meyers ◽  
Vinay Prasad
Keyword(s):  
The Past ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document