high mass region
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather E. Logan ◽  
Terry Pilkington

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (15) ◽  
pp. 2965-2995 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. ANISOVICH ◽  
V. V. ANISOVICH ◽  
M. A. MATVEEV ◽  
V. A. NIKONOV ◽  
A. V. SARANTSEV ◽  
...  

Supposing quark–diquark structure of baryons, we look for systematics of baryons composed of light quarks (q = u, d). We systematize baryons using the notion of two diquarks: (i) axial–vector state, [Formula: see text], with the spin SD = 1 and isospin ID = 1 and (ii) scalar one, [Formula: see text], with the spin SD = 0 and isospin ID = 0. We consider several schemes for the composed baryons: (1) with different diquark masses, [Formula: see text], (2) with [Formula: see text] and overlapping [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] states (resonances), (3) with/without SU(6) constraints for low-lying states (with quark–diquark orbital momenta L = 0). In the high-mass region, the model predicts several baryon resonances at M ~ 2.0–2.9 GeV . Moreover, the model gives us the double pole structure (i.e. two poles with the same Re M but different Im M) in many amplitudes at masses M ≳ 2.0 GeV . We see also that for description of low-lying baryons (with L = 0), the SU(6) constraint is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document