psychologically abusive
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 875-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane R. Follingstad ◽  
Ann L. Coker ◽  
Eunkyung Lee ◽  
Corrine M. Williams ◽  
Heather M. Bush ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane R. Follingstad ◽  
M. Jill Rogers

A detailed analysis of the occurrence of serious psychological abuse (PSYAB) in one’s “worst relationship” was solicited from a nationwide sample of adults in the United States. To designate that they experienced any of the psychologically abusive behaviors, respondents had to have perceived malignant intent by the perpetrator. Respondents reported significant rates of the presence and frequency for 14 specified categories of serious PSYAB as well as for the 42 individual behaviors constituting these categories (i.e., 3 per category). The 3 behaviors within each category frequently co-occurred even though they represented distinct manifestations and increasing levels of severity for that type of PSYAB. Only some of the behaviors demonstrated a relationship between frequency of that behavior in a relationship and subsequent emotional and behavioral impact. Neither demographics nor social desirability were strongly related to report of partner PSYAB.


2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 284-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-Jy Wang ◽  
Jong-Ni Lin ◽  
Feng-Ping Lee

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 435-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane R. Follingstad ◽  
Dana D. DeHart ◽  
Eric P. Green

Research literature suggests that clinical judgments of men’s versus women’s behavior and symptoms typically rate the men as more pathological and dangerous. To determine whether this view would extend to assessments of psychologically aggressive actions, two separate versions of a survey listing potentially psychologically abusive behaviors perpetrated by either a wife toward her husband or the identical actions perpetrated by a husband toward his wife were sent to a nationwide sampling of practicing psychologists. Results indicated that psychologists, irrespective of demographics, rated the husband’s behavior as more likely to be psychologically abusive and more severe in nature than the wife’s use of the same actions. Psychologists did not differentially rely on any of the three contextual factors (i.e., frequency/duration, intent of the perpetrator, and perception of the recipient) to influence their determination that a behavior was “psychological abuse” dependent upon whether the initiator of the psychological actions was the husband or the wife. Future research could assess more directly the rationale for the psychologists’ differing views of male versus female behavior. In addition, more normative information is needed to inform mental health professionals as to the prevalence and severity of psychologically aggressive actions in the general population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document