wildland recreation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

28
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 517-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J Gutzwiller ◽  
Ashley L D'Antonio ◽  
Christopher A Monz

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 23-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carena J. van Riper ◽  
Kenneth E. Wallen ◽  
Adam C. Landon ◽  
Michael A. Petriello ◽  
Gerard T. Kyle ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
H. Randy Gimblett ◽  
Merton T. Richards

Ecosystem management, in the ideal sense, gives appropriate consideration to the complex and interdependent ecological and social systems that comprise forestlands. One prominent and growing arena where ecological and social systems interact is in the recreational use of wildlands. Recreational uses of forestlands are among an extensive array of commodities and amenities that are increasingly demanded of forest managers. An in-depth understanding of the relationships between recreational and other important uses is essential to effective ecosystem management. Within the human dimension of ecosystem management, recreation and amenity uses of forestlands and the associated benefits of those uses, constitute an important component of management decisions. Forestland recreation is a special form of leisure behavior not only because it takes place outdoors, but because it depends upon a “natural” setting. Particular environmental settings are crucial to the fulfillment of forest recreation goals, because the recreationist seeks meaningful and satisfying experiences rather than simply engagement in activities. Importantly, wildland recreation takes place in settings that result from management actions of one form or another, whether the management objective is recreation opportunity, wildlife habitat improvement, or timber production, among others. The recreation opportunity spectrum (ROS) provides a conceptual framework for relating opportunities for particular behaviors and experiences to specific settings. The ROS argues that recreator's pursuits of certain activities in specific settings reveals their demand for experiences that are satisfying and that may give long-term benefits. The ROS framework describes a spectrum of recreation opportunity classes that relate a range of recreation experiences to an array of possible settings and activities. Setting structure is composed of three components: an ecological component, a social component, and a managerial component. The ecological component comprises the physical-biological conditions of the setting. These are typically delineated by the relative remoteness of the setting, its size, and evidence of human impact (number and condition of trails, structures, or roads, alteration of vegetation, etc.). The social component is typically defined by the number of users at one time (density) in the setting, delineated by the number of encounters or sightings a recreation party has with others.


1999 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 678 ◽  
Author(s):  
David K. Mann ◽  
William E. Hammitt ◽  
David N. Cole

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document