<p>Many
fields explore the origins of leadership qualities, with Galton’s (1874; 1869)
‘nature vs nurture’ contention being the central point of conjecture.
Contemporarily, Galton’s (1874; 1869) ‘nature versus nurture’ contention has
been re-imagined as ‘personality versus expertise’. Although contemporary
literature attempts conflating terminology specific to either personality and
behaviour, the phenomena remain distinct (Bass, 1990; Beebe, 2010; Burns, 1978;
Cattell, 1943b; Kania & Richards, 2012; Stogdill, 1974; 1948). Moreover,
Theory X and Theory Y conflate leaders who maintain willing fellowship and
those who can compel others to follow. With regard to personality and expertise
literature, as well as McGregor’s (2002) Theory X and Theory Y, Ladkin’s (2008)
philosophy-based ‘leading beautifully’ paradigm is discussed. Following which,
a new ‘leading beautifully’ model is proposed emphasising willing fellowship’s
role in leadership, as well as leaders’ inherent ableness to perceive
harmonious forms. It is proposed that all individuals are born potential
leaders, psyches expressed through personality which predicts their
situation-based leadership (Duke, 1986; Ladkin, 2008). Ultimately, leaders with
greater mastery of leadership will become better leaders, but inherently all
individuals may lead.</p>