avian vocalizations
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

19
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Buehler ◽  
Richard Fischer ◽  
John Wilkerson ◽  
Stacy Worley ◽  
David Smith ◽  
...  

This demonstration project addressed the Department of Defense need for innovative technology for monitoring avian populations in inaccessible areas. This report presents results from field validation tests for an autonomous aerial acoustic recording system, a helium-filled weather balloon that transported an instrument payload over inaccessible areas (e.g., ordnance impact areas) to record avian vocalizations.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca N. Lewis ◽  
Leah J. Williams ◽  
R. Tucker Gilman

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary J. Ruff ◽  
Damon B. Lesmeister ◽  
Leila S. Duchac ◽  
Bharath K. Padmaraju ◽  
Christopher M. Sullivan

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1591-1601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bronwen Hennigar ◽  
Jeffrey P Ethier ◽  
David R Wilson

Abstract Understanding how anthropogenic disturbance affects animal behavior is challenging because observational studies often involve co-occurring disturbances (e.g., noise, lighting, and roadways), and laboratory experiments often lack ecological validity. During the 2016 and 2017 avian breeding seasons, we investigated the effects of anthropogenic noise and light on the singing and spatial behavior of wild birds by independently manipulating the presence of each type of disturbance at 89 sites in an otherwise undisturbed boreal forest in Labrador, Canada. Each treatment was surrounded by an eight-channel microphone array that recorded and localized avian vocalizations throughout the manipulation. We analyzed the effects of noise and light on the timing of the first vocalizations of each species at each array during the dawn chorus, and on the proximity of the vocalizing birds to the disturbance when those songs were produced. We analyzed all species combined, and then conducted separate analyses for the six most common species: boreal chickadee, dark-eyed junco, ruby-crowned kinglet, Swainson’s thrush, white-throated sparrow, and yellow-rumped warbler. When all species were analyzed together, we found that traffic noise attracted vocalizing birds. There was some evidence that light repelled birds, but this evidence was inconsistent. In our species-specific analyses, yellow-rumped warbler sang earlier in response to noise; Swainson’s thrush was attracted to noise and the combination of noise and light but repelled by light alone. Our study provides some of the first experimental evidence of the independent and combined effects of traffic noise and light on the vocal and spatial behavior of wild birds and suggests that breeding birds may be attracted to noisy roads where they could be exposed to additional forms of disturbance.


Ethology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 472-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy I. Oden ◽  
Mary Bomberger Brown ◽  
Mark E. Burbach ◽  
James R. Brandle ◽  
John E. Quinn

Chinese Birds ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianqiang LI ◽  
Yanyun ZHANG ◽  
Zhengwang ZHANG

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document