tailless aircraft
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

97
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Shearwood ◽  
Mostafa R. Nabawy ◽  
William J. Crowther ◽  
Clyde Warsop

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1407
Author(s):  
Bowen Nie ◽  
Zhitao Liu ◽  
Tianhao Guo ◽  
Litao Fan ◽  
Hongxu Ma ◽  
...  

This paper focuses on the design of a disturbance rejection controller for a tailless aircraft based on the technique of nonlinear dynamic inversion (NDI). The tailless aircraft model mounted on a three degree-of-freedom (3-DOF) dynamic rig in the wind tunnel is modeled as a nonlinear affine system subject to mismatched disturbances. First of all, a baseline NDI attitude controller is designed for sufficient stability and good reference tracking performance of the nominal system. Then, a nonlinear disturbance observer (NDO) is supplemented to the baseline NDI controller to estimate the lumped disturbances for compensation, including unmodeled dynamics, parameter uncertainties, and external disturbances. Mathematical analysis demonstrates the convergence of the employed NDO and the resulting closed-loop system. Furthermore, an anti-windup modification is applied to the NDO for control performance preserving in the presence of actuator saturation. Subsequently, the designed control schemes are preliminarily validated and compared via simulations. The baseline NDI controller demonstrates satisfactory attitude tracking performance in the case of nominal simulation; the NDO augmented NDI controller presents significantly improved ability of disturbance rejection when compared with the baseline NDI controller in the case of robust simulation; the anti-windup modified scheme, rather than the baseline NDI controller nor the NDO augmented NDI controller, can preserve the closed-loop performance in the case of actuator saturation. Finally, the baseline NDI scheme and the NDO augmented NDI scheme are implemented and further validated in the wind tunnel flight tests, which demonstrate that the experimental results are in good agreement with that of the simulations.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Shearwood ◽  
Mostafa R. Nabawy ◽  
William Crowther ◽  
Clyde Warsop

Author(s):  
T. S. Ganesh ◽  
M. C. Keerthi ◽  
Sabari Girish ◽  
S. Sreeja Kumar ◽  
B. Mrunalini
Keyword(s):  

Aerospace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Shearwood ◽  
Mostafa R. A. Nabawy ◽  
William J. Crowther ◽  
Clyde Warsop

Tailless aircraft without vertical stabilisers typically use drag effectors in the form of spoilers or split flaps to generate control moments in yaw. This paper introduces a novel control allocation method by which full three-axis control authority can be achieved by the use of conventional lift effectors only, which reduces system complexity and control deflection required to achieve a given yawing moment. The proposed method is based on synthesis of control allocation modes that generate asymmetric profile and lift induced drag whilst maintaining the lift, pitching moment and rolling moment at the trim state. The method uses low order models for aerodynamic behaviour characterisation based on thin aerofoil theory, lifting surface methodology and ESDU datasheets and is applied to trapezoidal wings of varying sweep and taper. Control allocation modes are derived using the zero-sets of surrogate models for the characterised aerodynamic behaviours. Results are presented in the form of control allocations for a range of trimmed sideslip angles up to 10 degrees optimised for either maximum aerodynamic efficiency (minimum drag for a specific yawing moment) or minimum aggregate control deflection (as a surrogate observability metric). Outcomes for the two optimisation objectives are correlated in that minimum deflection solutions are always consistent with efficient ones. A configuration with conventional drag effector is used as a reference baseline. It is shown that, through appropriate allocation of lift based control effectors, a given yawing moment can be produced with up to a factor of eight less aggregate control deflection and up to 30% less overall drag compared to use of a conventional drag effector.


IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 109543-109556
Author(s):  
Bowen Nie ◽  
Zhitao Liu ◽  
Fei Cen ◽  
Duoneng Liu ◽  
Hongxu Ma ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document