Action Video Game Players Do Not Differ in the Perception of Contrast-Based Motion Illusions but Experience More Vection and Less Discomfort in a Virtual Environment Compared to Non-Action Video Game Players

Action video game players (AVGPs) show enhanced visual perceptual functions compared to their non-video game playing peers (NVGPs). Whether AVGPs are more susceptible towards static contrast motion illusions, such as Fraser Wilcox illusions, has not been addressed so far. Based on their improved perceptual skills, AVGPs are expected to be more susceptible to the illusions and perceive more motion in them. The experience of illusory self-motion (vection) is believed to be dependent on top-down attentional processes; AVGPs should therefore experience stronger vection compared to NVGPs based on their improved attentional skills. Lastly, due to their extensive prior experience with virtual environments, AVGPs should experience less discomfort in VR compared to NVGPs. We presented rotating and expanding motion illusions in a virtual environment and asked 22 AVGPs and 21 NVGPs to indicate the strength of illusory motion, as well as the level of discomfort and vection experienced when exposed to these motion illusions. Results indicated that AVGPs and NVGPs perceived the same amount of motion when viewing these illusions. However, AVGPs perceived more vection and less discomfort compared to NVGPs, possibly due to factors such as enhanced top-down attentional control and adaptation. No differences in the perception of expanding and rotating illusions were found. Discomfort experienced by AVGPs was related to illusion strength, suggesting that contrast illusions might evoke the perceived discomfort rather than the virtual environment. Further studies are required to investigate the relationship between contrast sensitivity, migraine and the perception of illusion in AVGPs which should include illusory motion onset and duration measures.

Characterizing the whiteness dependence of the Hermann and Scintillating Grid visual illusions

The Hermann Grid and the Scintillating Grid are among the most prominent brightness-contrast illusions. Perception of these illusions is sensitive to a wide range of image parameters including color, linearity of the edges, and visual size of the images. Here we characterize the influence of three prominent parameters that influence grid illusion perception--dot whiteness, line whiteness, and background whiteness. Experimental data was obtained from several volunteer groups that were tasked with scoring the magnitude of the illusion for images exhibiting different whiteness levels of these three grid elements. Analysis of the data revealed a significant dependence of illusion perception on the whiteness of grid elements. Surprisingly, illusion perception effectively disappeared after an intermediate threshold of whiteness for the dot, line, and background elements in both the Scintillating Grid and Hermann Grid. Moreover, increasing the size of elements decreased the illusion magnitude. The results of this study quantify the whiteness-dependence of brightness-contrast grid illusions and may motivate new experiments to understand the neural mechanisms that are responsible for their perception.

When men appear smaller or larger than they really are: preliminary evidence that women are fooled by size illusions in attractiveness judgment tasks

In humans, studies have shown that contrast illusions can affect perceptions of facial attractiveness and dominance. In non-human animals, recent research found that contrast illusions of size positively affected male mate value. In humans, male height is a potentially important indicator of mate value, with women preferring men taller than themselves. We tested in two studies whether height contrast illusions could affect women’s perceptions of male height and mate value, particularly attractiveness, dominance, and muscularity. Using computer-generated images of men of different heights standing in groups of three, 104 female participants rated targets either surrounded by shorter, same height, or taller distractors in a within-subject design. The second experiment (N=80) replicated and extended the first by making the images more realistic and adding natural backgrounds, suggesting that when participants are given a visual anchor, in order to get a better sense of the absolute height of the targets, the effects remain. In both studies, results showed that, compared with same height distractors, male targets were rated as taller when surrounded by shorter distractors, and as shorter when surrounded by taller distractors. Additionally, attractiveness, dominance, and muscularity perceptions were affected in a similar manner, with most of the differences in these appraisals being mediated by the perceived height differences. Therefore, differently sized distractors affected the perceived height and mate value of the targets, which were in effect all of the same constant size. These findings indicate that context dependent effects could potentially influence attractiveness judgments. The same man might thus be perceived as more attractive when surrounded by men of similar or smaller height, as opposed to when surrounded by men who are taller.