optical detector
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

232
(FIVE YEARS 24)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Peter R. Birkin ◽  
Jack J. Youngs ◽  
Tadd T. Truscott ◽  
Silvana Martini

Oscillating microbubbles, driven by the local sound field, and crystals are detected and sized in oils as they pass through an optical detector.


HardwareX ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. e00228
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Harvie ◽  
Surendra K. Yadav ◽  
John C. de Mello
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J Harvie ◽  
Surendra K Yadav ◽  
John C de Mello
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Michael Kufner ◽  
Josef Kolbl ◽  
Raphael Lukas ◽  
Thomas Dekorsy

Author(s):  
Joseph Seibert ◽  
Peter Ade ◽  
Aamir M. Ali ◽  
Kam Arnold ◽  
Nicholas F. Cothard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 107864
Author(s):  
Hatice Kacus ◽  
Yilmaz Sahin ◽  
Sakir Aydogan ◽  
Umit Incekara ◽  
Mehmet Yilmaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 32-37
Author(s):  
Abbas F. Nori ◽  
◽  
Faisel G. Mohammed

In this work comparison between the results of the first systems is a fixed solar and the second is the sun tracking in an attempt to increase the proportion of electricity production. Here a microcontroller (Arduino) and the light-dependent resistor (LDR) photo detector is used in this tracker. And then compare the results in different weather conditions and on different days to test the efficiency of the two systems. The efficiency of the tracking system is better than the fixed system by 12.3% on a sunny day and 4.9% on a partly cloudy day. However, it failed by 3.3% on a cloudy day. With a sunny day preference in the tracking system at 6.9% of partially cloudy days, and 12.1% with partially cloudy to a cloudy day. And verified from The efficiency of the work of the microcontroller (Arduino) system and the optical detector (LDR).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document