medicaid reimbursement
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

129
(FIVE YEARS 18)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Hand ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 155894472096496
Author(s):  
William Baker ◽  
Michael Rivlin ◽  
Samir Sodha ◽  
Michael Nakashian ◽  
Brian Katt ◽  
...  

Background: Medicare (MCR) and Medicaid (MCD) remain the dominant providers of government-funded health insurance in the United States. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the variability between MCR and MCD reimbursements for common hand and wrist surgical procedures. We hypothesized that MCD reimbursement rates would have substantial variation between states, whereas MCR rates would remain relatively constant. Methods: Using the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Database, the 2019 reimbursements for 7 common hand and wrist procedures were recorded via the respective Current Procedural Terminology codes. The MCD reimbursement rates were then obtained from each state’s physician fee schedule database. Comparisons of reimbursement for these procedures were then calculated between states and between MCD and MCR while adjusting for cost of living using the Medicare Wage Index. Finally, the coefficients of variation were computed to compare the extent of variability between the insurance types. Results: Across all procedures, reimbursement rates for MCD ranged from 30.6% to 240% of the average MCR reimbursement, with the mean reimbursement for MCD valued at 78.3% of MCR. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (CTR) is valued similarly by MCD compared with open CTR with an average of 77.7% and 78.2% reimbursement of MCR, respectively. The coefficients of variation for MCD reimbursements ranged from 0.25 to 0.45, whereas the value was 0.06 for all MCR procedures. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate a wide variation in MCD payments between states. When compared with MCR, the lower average state MCD reimbursement questions the sustainability for hand surgeons to accept these patients in practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 119 (820) ◽  
pp. 323-325
Author(s):  
Deborah Carr

The COVID-19 pandemic has taken a devastating toll on the lives of older adults, intensifying long-standing challenges in the US health care system. Persistent health and mortality disparities on the basis of race and socioeconomic status, staffing shortages and insufficient financial resources at some nursing homes, and a reluctance among Americans to make formal plans for their end-of-life health care are problems of heightened magnitude in the pandemic era. Policy solutions like extending Medicare benefits to younger people, increasing Medicaid reimbursement rates, and facilitating formal conversations regarding end-of-life care may help Americans to age and die with dignity.


Contraception ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-200
Author(s):  
Yves-Yvette Young ◽  
Terri-Ann Thompson ◽  
David S. Cohen ◽  
Kelly Blanchard

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (7) ◽  
pp. 684-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily B. Jones ◽  
Erin M. Staab ◽  
Wen Wan ◽  
Michael T. Quinn ◽  
Cynthia Schaefer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 110s
Author(s):  
Amy Addante ◽  
Susannah Koch ◽  
Allison Brubaker ◽  
Duckham Hillary ◽  
Melissa Tepe ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (22) ◽  
pp. 1585-1590
Author(s):  
David S. Casper ◽  
Gregory D. Schroeder ◽  
James McKenzie ◽  
Benjamin Zmistowski ◽  
Jayanth Vatson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document