solid reactant
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

28
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Fronk ◽  
P. Armatis ◽  
P. Sabharwall ◽  
V. Utgikar ◽  
A. Gupta


Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 3398
Author(s):  
Václav Tesař

Heterogeneous solid/fluid chemical reactions—as well as reactions dependent on solid catalysts—require spreading the active solid substance on the largest accessible area. The solution is a thin layer covering as much as possible convoluted surface of an inert support. This is nowadays the internal surface of narrow parallel passages. The supporting body is usually ceramic, its passages now mostly of square cross section. Reliable detailed knowledge of pressure drop across the set of passages has to be available, especially for flow control based on fluid property changes (e.g., with temperature or fluid composition). This paper presents results of laboratory measurements as well as numerical flowfield computations of the passage flows, with discovered universal law.



2018 ◽  
Vol 232 ◽  
pp. 108-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taizheng Liu ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
Ying Xin ◽  
Zhaoliang Zhang ◽  
Xingfu Tang ◽  
...  


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 62 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Lloyd Provis

The equation of Jander [W. Jander, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. (1927) 163: 1-30] is often used to describe the kinetics of dissolution of solid cement grains, as a component of mathematical descriptions of the broader cement hydration process. The Jander equation can be presented as kt/R2 =[1-(1-α) (1/3) ]2 where k is a constant, t is time, R is the initial radius of a solid reactant particle, and α is the fractional degree of reaction. This equation is attractive for its simplicity and apparently straightforward derivation. However, the derivation of the Jander equation involves an approximation related to neglect of particle surface curvature which means that it is strictly not correct for anything beyond a very small extent of reaction. This is well documented in the broader literature, but this information has not been effectively propagated to the field of cement science, which means that researchers are continuing to base models on this erroneous equation. It is recommended that if the assumptions of diffusion control and unchanging overall particle size which lead to the selection of the Jander equation are to be retained, it is preferable to instead use the Ginstling-Brounshtein equation [A.M. Ginstling, B.I. Brounshtein, J. Appl. Chem. USSR (1950) 23: 1327-1338], which does correctly account for particle surface curvature without significant extra mathematical complication. Otherwise, it is possible (and likely desirable) to move to more advanced descriptions of particle-fluid reactions to account for factors such as dimensional changes during reaction, and the possibility of rate controlling influences other than diffusion.



2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 2131-2140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ailar Hajimohammadi ◽  
Jannie S. J. van Deventer


2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 513-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Aihara ◽  
Takeshi Yoshii ◽  
Yohei Shimazaki ◽  
Takashi Takeuchi ◽  
Hitoshi Habuka




2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (13) ◽  
pp. 1270-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Aihara ◽  
Keiko Tanaka ◽  
Mayuka Watanabe ◽  
Takashi Takeuchi ◽  
Hitoshi Habuka


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document