forbidden subgraphs
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

164
(FIVE YEARS 30)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Vol 185 ◽  
pp. 105538
Author(s):  
Meng-Yue Cao ◽  
Jack H. Koolen ◽  
Yen-Chi Roger Lin ◽  
Wei-Hsuan Yu
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 344 (10) ◽  
pp. 112522
Author(s):  
James Carraher ◽  
Michael Ferrara ◽  
Timothy Morris ◽  
Michael Santana
Keyword(s):  

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1346
Author(s):  
Yeva Fadhilah Ashari ◽  
A.N.M. Salman ◽  
Rinovia Simanjuntak

A graph G admits an H-covering if every edge of G belongs to a subgraph isomorphic to a given graph H. G is said to be H-magic if there exists a bijection f:V(G)∪E(G)→{1,2,…,|V(G)|+|E(G)|} such that wf(H′)=∑v∈V(H′)f(v)+∑e∈E(H′)f(e) is a constant, for every subgraph H′ isomorphic to H. In particular, G is said to be H-supermagic if f(V(G))={1,2,…,|V(G)|}. When H is isomorphic to a complete graph K2, an H-(super)magic labeling is an edge-(super)magic labeling. Suppose that G admits an F-covering and H-covering for two given graphs F and H. We define G to be (F,H)-sim-(super)magic if there exists a bijection f′ that is simultaneously F-(super)magic and H-(super)magic. In this paper, we consider (K2,H)-sim-(super)magic where H is isomorphic to three classes of graphs with varied symmetry: a cycle which is symmetric (both vertex-transitive and edge-transitive), a star which is edge-transitive but not vertex-transitive, and a path which is neither vertex-transitive nor edge-transitive. We discover forbidden subgraphs for the existence of (K2,H)-sim-(super)magic graphs and classify classes of (K2,H)-sim-(super)magic graphs. We also derive sufficient conditions for edge-(super)magic graphs to be (K2,H)-sim-(super)magic and utilize such conditions to characterize some (K2,H)-sim-(super)magic graphs.


10.37236/9961 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pallabi Manna ◽  
Peter J. Cameron ◽  
Ranjit Mehatari

The undirected power graph (or simply power graph) of a group $G$, denoted by $P(G)$, is a graph whose vertices are the elements of the group $G$, in which two vertices $u$ and $v$ are connected by an edge between if and only if either $u=v^i$ or $v=u^j$ for some $i$, $j$. A number of important graph classes, including perfect graphs, cographs, chordal graphs, split graphs, and threshold graphs, can be defined either structurally or in terms of forbidden induced subgraphs. We examine each of these five classes and attempt to determine for which groups $G$ the power graph $P(G)$ lies in the class under consideration. We give complete results in the case of nilpotent groups, and partial results in greater generality. In particular, the power graph is always perfect; and we determine completely the groups whose power graph is a threshold or split graph (the answer is the same for both classes). We give a number of open problems.


Algorithmica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Hsuan Chen ◽  
Ling-Ju Hung ◽  
Henri Lotze ◽  
Peter Rossmanith

AbstractIn online edge- and node-deletion problems the input arrives node by node and an algorithm has to delete nodes or edges in order to keep the input graph in a given graph class $$\Pi $$ Π at all times. We consider only hereditary properties $$\Pi $$ Π , for which optimal online algorithms exist and which can be characterized by a set of forbidden subgraphs $${{\mathcal{F}}}$$ F and analyze the advice complexity of getting an optimal solution. We give almost tight bounds on the Delayed Connected$${{\mathcal{F}}}$$ F -Node-Deletion Problem, where all graphs of the family $${\mathcal{F}}$$ F have to be connected and almost tight lower and upper bounds for the Delayed$$H$$ H -Node-Deletion Problem, where there is one forbidden induced subgraph H that may be connected or not. For the Delayed$$H$$ H -Node-Deletion Problem the advice complexity is basically an easy function of the size of the biggest component in H. Additionally, we give tight bounds on the Delayed Connected$${\mathcal{F}}$$ F -Edge-Deletion Problem, where we have an arbitrary number of forbidden connected graphs. For the latter result we present an algorithm that computes the advice complexity directly from $${\mathcal{F}}$$ F . We give a separate analysis for the Delayed Connected$$H$$ H -Edge-Deletion Problem, which is less general but admits a bound that is easier to compute.


2021 ◽  
Vol 344 (4) ◽  
pp. 112267
Author(s):  
Qing Cui ◽  
Qinghai Liu ◽  
Colton Magnant ◽  
Akira Saito
Keyword(s):  

Algorithms ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Serafino Cicerone

Cicerone and Di Stefano defined and studied the class of k-distance-hereditary graphs, i.e., graphs where the distance in each connected induced subgraph is at most k times the distance in the whole graph. The defined graphs represent a generalization of the well known distance-hereditary graphs, which actually correspond to 1-distance-hereditary graphs. In this paper we make a step forward in the study of these new graphs by providing characterizations for the class of all the k-distance-hereditary graphs such that k<2. The new characterizations are given in terms of both forbidden subgraphs and cycle-chord properties. Such results also lead to devise a polynomial-time recognition algorithm for this kind of graph that, according to the provided characterizations, simply detects the presence of quasi-holes in any given graph.


2021 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 201-237
Author(s):  
Natasha Morrison ◽  
Alexander Roberts ◽  
Alex Scott

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 839-866
Author(s):  
Wei Zheng ◽  
Hajo Broersma ◽  
Ligong Wang

AbstractMotivated by several conjectures due to Nikoghosyan, in a recent article due to Li et al., the aim was to characterize all possible graphs H such that every 1-tough H-free graph is hamiltonian. The almost complete answer was given there by the conclusion that every proper induced subgraph H of $$K_1\cup P_4$$ K 1 ∪ P 4 can act as a forbidden subgraph to ensure that every 1-tough H-free graph is hamiltonian, and that there is no other forbidden subgraph with this property, except possibly for the graph $$K_1\cup P_4$$ K 1 ∪ P 4 itself. The hamiltonicity of 1-tough $$K_1\cup P_4$$ K 1 ∪ P 4 -free graphs, as conjectured by Nikoghosyan, was left there as an open case. In this paper, we consider the stronger property of pancyclicity under the same condition. We find that the results are completely analogous to the hamiltonian case: every graph H such that any 1-tough H-free graph is hamiltonian also ensures that every 1-tough H-free graph is pancyclic, except for a few specific classes of graphs. Moreover, there is no other forbidden subgraph having this property. With respect to the open case for hamiltonicity of 1-tough $$K_1\cup P_4$$ K 1 ∪ P 4 -free graphs we give infinite families of graphs that are not pancyclic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document