Abstract
Let X and Y be pathwise connected and paracompact Hausdorff spaces equipped with free involutions
T
:
X
→
X
{T:X\to X}
and
S
:
Y
→
Y
{S:Y\to Y}
, respectively. Suppose that there exists a sequence
(
X
i
,
T
i
)
⟶
h
i
(
X
i
+
1
,
T
i
+
1
)
for
1
≤
i
≤
k
,
(X_{i},T_{i})\overset{h_{i}}{\longrightarrow}(X_{i+1},T_{i+1})\quad\text{for }%
1\leq i\leq k,
where, for each i,
X
i
{X_{i}}
is a pathwise connected and paracompact Hausdorff space equipped with a free involution
T
i
{T_{i}}
, such that
X
k
+
1
=
X
{X_{k+1}=X}
, and
h
i
:
X
i
→
X
i
+
1
{h_{i}:X_{i}\to X_{i+1}}
is an equivariant map, for all
1
≤
i
≤
k
{1\leq i\leq k}
. To achieve Borsuk–Ulam-type theorems, in several results that appear in the literature, the involved spaces X in the statements are assumed to be cohomological n-acyclic spaces. In this paper, by considering a more wide class of topological spaces X (which are not necessarily cohomological n-acyclic spaces), we prove that there is no equivariant map
f
:
(
X
,
T
)
→
(
Y
,
S
)
{f:(X,T)\to(Y,S)}
and we present some interesting examples to illustrate our results.