distinct pair
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

5
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liza E. Brusman ◽  
David S. W. Protter ◽  
Allison C. Fultz ◽  
Maya U. Paulson ◽  
Gabriel D. Chapel ◽  
...  

AbstractIn pair bonding animals, coordinated behavior between partners is required for the pair to accomplish shared goals such as raising young. Despite this, experimental designs rarely assess the behavior of both partners within a bonded pair. Thus, we lack an understanding of the interdependent behavioral dynamics between partners that likely facilitate relationship success. To identify intra-pair behavioral correlates of pair bonding, we used socially monogamous prairie voles, a species in which females and males exhibit both overlapping and distinct pair bond behaviors. We tested both partners using social choice and non-choice tests at short- and long-term pairing timepoints. Females developed a preference for their partner more rapidly than males, with preference driven by different behaviors in each sex. Further, as bonds matured, intra-pair behavioral sex differences and coordinated behavior emerged – females consistently huddled more with their partner than males did, and partner huddle time became correlated between partners. When animals were allowed to freely interact with a partner or a novel in sequential free interaction tests, pairs spent more time interacting together than either animal did with a novel. Pair interaction was correlated with female, but not male, behavior. Via a social operant paradigm, we found that pair-bonded females, but not males, are more motivated to access and huddle with their partner than a novel vole. Together, our data indicate that as pair bonds mature, sex differences and coordinated behavior emerge, and that these intra-pair behavioral changes are likely organized and driven by the female animal.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. eabd8637
Author(s):  
Jemma L. Webber ◽  
John C. Clancy ◽  
Yingjie Zhou ◽  
Natalia Yraola ◽  
Kazuaki Homma ◽  
...  

Hearing involves a stereotyped neural network communicating cochlea and brain. How this sensorineural circuit assembles is largely unknown. The cochlea houses two types of mechanosensory hair cells differing in function (sound transmission versus amplification) and location (inner versus outer compartments). Inner (IHCs) and outer hair cells (OHCs) are each innervated by a distinct pair of afferent and efferent neurons: IHCs are contacted by type I afferents receiving axodendritic efferent contacts; OHCs are contacted by type II afferents and axosomatically terminating efferents. Using an Insm1 mouse mutant with IHCs in the position of OHCs, we discover a hierarchical sequence of instructions in which first IHCs attract, and OHCs repel, type I afferents; second, type II afferents innervate hair cells not contacted by type I afferents; and last, afferent fiber type determines if and how efferents innervate, whether axodendritically on the afferent, axosomatically on the hair cell, or not at all.


2009 ◽  
Vol 141 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason J. Gibbs

AbstractBy means of an integrative taxonomic approach using morphology and DNA barcodes, multiple cryptic species within Lasioglossum (Dialictus) petrellum (Cockerell) (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) were discovered. Analysis of DNA barcode sequence data from across the supposed range of L. petrellum revealed distinct genetic differences that correlate with patterns of morphological variation and geographical distribution. The most morphologically distinct pair of species had the smallest DNA-barcode gap. The taxonomic limits of L. petrellum are revised and four new species are described and illustrated: L. (D.) tuolumnensesp. nov., L. (D.) griswoldisp. nov.L. (D.) droegeisp. nov., and L. (D.) viridipetrellumsp. nov. A key to species of the “L. petrellum” group is provided.


2002 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. D. Choi ◽  
T. Y. Lam ◽  
B. Reznick

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document