salvage cryotherapy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

76
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 0)



Author(s):  
Sanchia S. Goonewardene ◽  
Raj Persad ◽  
David Albala ◽  
Declan Cahill




2020 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. e1058
Author(s):  
Arnon Lavi* ◽  
Shiva M. Nair ◽  
Joseph L. Chin


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Bain ◽  
Adam Kinnaird ◽  
Ryan McLarty ◽  
Gerald Todd ◽  
Michael P. Chetner ◽  
...  

Introduction: Salvage cryotherapy is a guideline-recommended treatment of localized prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy. There is little published evidence analyzing the outcomes of salvage cryotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer following different primary therapy energy modalities. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who received whole gland salvage cryotherapy from 2007–2017 at a large tertiary referral center after either primary radiation therapy (RT) or primary whole gland cryotherapy. Primary outcome was biochemical failure, defined as per the Phoenix criteria (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] nadir + 2.0 ng/ml). Secondary outcomes included time to biochemical failure and development of metastatic disease. Results: Fifty-eight out of 391 patients who received cryotherapy were identified as having received salvage cryotherapy (after RT, n=37; after primary cryotherapy, n=21). Biochemical recurrence occurred in 21 (57%) patients with previous RT and in 17 (81%) patients with previous cryotherapy (p=0.001). Median time to biochemical recurrence was 18 months for patients with previous RT and 13 months for patients with previous cryotherapy (p=0.002). The biochemical free survival rate for primary radiation therapy patients was 71% at two years compared to 23% at two years for patients who underwent primary cryotherapy (p<0.01). There was no difference in the development of metastatic disease between groups (19% vs. 18%, cryo vs. radiation, p=0.34). Conclusions: These results suggest that salvage cryotherapy may offer more durable oncological control to patients after radiation compared to primary cryotherapy with a lower rate and longer duration before biochemical recurrence.



2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (07) ◽  
pp. E904-E911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clayton M. Spiceland ◽  
B. Joseph Elmunzer ◽  
Samuel Paros ◽  
Logan Roof ◽  
Molly McVey ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Some patients with dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus (BE) experience suboptimal response to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), or the combination. Cryotherapy has been used as salvage therapy in these patients, but outcomes data are limited. We aimed to assess clinical outcomes among a large cohort of patients with dysplastic BE whose condition had failed to respond to RFA and/or EMR. Patients and methods This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive cases of dysplastic BE or intramucosal carcinoma (IMC) treated with salvage cryotherapy at a tertiary-care academic medical center. The primary goal of cryotherapy treatment was eradication of all neoplasia. The secondary goal was eradication of all intestinal metaplasia. The proportion of patients undergoing salvage cryotherapy who achieved complete eradication of dysplasia (CE-D) and metaplasia (CE-IM), as well as the time to CE-D and CE-IM were calculated. Results Over a 12-year period, 46 patients received salvage cryotherapy. All patients underwent RFA prior to cryotherapy, either at our center or prior to referral, and 50 % of patients underwent EMR. A majority of patients (54 %) had high-grade dysplasia (HGD) at referral, while 33 % had low-grade dysplasia (LGD), and 13 % had IMC. Overall, 38 patients (83 %) reached CE-D and 21 (46 %) reached CE-IM. Median time to CE-D was 18 months, median number of total interventions (RFA, cryotherapy, and EMR) was five, and median number of cryotherapy sessions was two. Conclusion Salvage cryotherapy appears safe and effective for treating BE that is refractory to RFA and/or EMR.



2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (Supplement 4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiva Nair* ◽  
Max Peters ◽  
Haider Abed ◽  
Jochem van der Voort van Zyp ◽  
Marieke van Son ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. e869
Author(s):  
S.M. Nair ◽  
M. Peters ◽  
H. Abed ◽  
J. Van Der Voort Van Zyp ◽  
M. Van Son ◽  
...  




2018 ◽  
Vol 199 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm Dewar ◽  
Timothy Lyon ◽  
Jeffrey Karnes ◽  
Haider Abed ◽  
Khalil Hetou ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document