Postless Hip Arthroscopy: A Safer Alternative for Treatment of Femoracetabular Impingement Syndrome

Background: Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome continues to gain popularity and indications for its use are expanding. Though low complication rates have previously been reported, there are iatrogenic complications specific to the use of the perineal post, such as pudendal nerve injuries, and possible pressure skin necrosis that warrant concern in the healthy young patient. The risk of these complications are increased during simultaneous bilateral hip arthroscopy. Indications: We describe a new technique, which will prevent such problems by using a postless pink pad technique in order to achieve adequate hip distraction. Technique Description: Arthroscopic investigation begins with proper, safe patient positioning in order to gain access to the hip joint with sufficient joint distraction. In the postless technique, a dense foam pad is utilized in lieu of a perineal post. The static friction between the pad, bed, and the patient counters the manual gross traction necessary to distract the hip joint while preventing the patient from sliding down or off of the operating table. The postless technique avoids pressure to the perineum and also allows for greater range of motion during dynamic intraoperative examination and femoroplasty. After hip distraction, standard portal placement allows for access to the central compartment in order to assess intraarticular pathology. Once identified on diagnostic arthroscopy, appropriate techniques are utilized to correct acetabular-sided pincer lesions, labral tears, and femoral-sided cam deformities. Results: When discussing this technique with patients, it is important to highlight that it diminishes the possibility of iatrogenic pressure injury to the pudendal nerve and skin of the perineum. The risk of these injuries typically occurs when the pudenal nerve is compressed against the post during traction and abduction. As such, postless technique prevents any compression and pressure to these regions. Discussion/Conclusion: Hip arthroscopy is a minimally invasive, low morbidity technique for treating a variety of chondral, ligamentous, and bony conditions of the hip. However, studies suggest that pudenal nerve injury is seen in up to 4.3% of patients following hip arthroscopy. Given avoidance of iatrogenic post complications, we describe a postless technique for achieving hip distraction during hip arthroscopy.

The effects of venting and capsulotomy on traction force and hip distraction in hip arthroscopy

This study evaluated the effects of venting and capsulotomy on the ratio of normalized distraction distance to traction force, correlating this trend with patient demographic factors. A ratio was chosen to capture the total effect of each intervention on the hip joint. During primary hip arthroscopy, continuous traction force was recorded, and fluoroscopic images were acquired to measure joint distraction before and after the application of traction, venting and interportal capsulotomy. Distraction–traction force ratios were compared using a one-sided paired t-test. A linear regression model was used to determine the relationship between age, sex and body mass index and pre- and post-intervention distraction–traction force ratios. Seventy-two adult patients and 73 hips were included. There was an increase in hip distraction with a decrease in traction force post-venting and capsulotomy (both P’s <0.001). Mean normalized distraction distance increased 1.5% of femoral head size after venting and an additional 2.2% of femoral head size after capsulotomy. Mean traction force decreased 2.2% (14.7 N) after venting and 2.3% (15.3 N) after capsulotomy. Female sex significantly correlated with larger differences in both pre- and post-venting capsulotomy ratios. Venting and capsulotomy both independently improve the ratio of normalized distraction distance to traction force when performed in vivo. However, the effect sizes of each intervention are small and of questionable clinical significance. Specifically, when adequate distraction for safe surgical hip access cannot be obtained despite application of significant traction force, venting and capsulotomy after the application of traction may not afford substantial improvement.

Arthrodiastasis in the Management of Perthes’ Disease: A Systematic Review

Background This systematic review explores the relevant literature to assess the efficacy of the use of arthrodiastasis in the management of Perthes disease. Until this moment, arthrodiastasis is not well established for its use in Perthes disease as opposed to other containment procedures. Furthermore, there are no clear indications for its use in this disease. Methodology 12 articles were matched to the inclusion criteria and all articles were reviewed and radiological and clinical data was collected and compiled. Results a significant increase in postoperative range of motion compared to the preoperative ones was found. Final Stullberg classification was ascertained showing majority of patients ending with stages two and three. Complications were also assessed with majority of them being superficial pin tract infections. Conclusion the use of arthrodiastasis is a valid treatment option for Perthes disease however more articles need to be produced showing comparative data of arthrodiastasis versus other containment procedures. Index Terms- Arthrodiastasis, Perthes’ Disease, LCPD, Hinged Distraction the preservation of an intact and congruent femoral head. It is proposed that by applying distraction early in the disease, before any significant collapse of the femoral head had occurred, further fragmentation would be halted.[3]Articulated hip distraction maintains the proper head position by containment in abduction, extension, and neutral rotation. It also decreases joint pressure and thus decreases the deforming force and provides a good environment for cartilage repair. The femoral head deformity that develops in Perthes’ disease is believed to occur during this fragmentation phase of the disease. The possibility for joint motion allows for articular cartilage nutrition and the molding effect of the acetabulum. The aim of the articulated distraction method is to neutralize muscle and weight-bearing forces, to prevent stress fractures of subchondral immature bone, and to encourage synovial circulation and promote creeping substitution by breaking the ‘vicious circle’ of necrosis.[4]

Vertical Extension of the T-Capsulotomy Incision in Hip Arthroscopic Surgery Does Not Affect the Force Required for Hip Distraction: Effect of Capsulotomy Size, Type, and Subsequent Repair

Background: Interportal and T-capsulotomies are popular techniques for exposing femoroacetabular impingement deformities. The difference between techniques with regard to the force required to distract the hip is currently unknown. Purpose: To quantify how increasing interportal capsulotomy size, conversion to T-capsulotomy, and subsequent repair affect the force required to distract the hip. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric hip specimens were dissected and fixed in a materials testing system, such that pure axial distraction of the iliofemoral ligament could be achieved. The primary outcome measure was the load required to distract the hip to a distance of 6 mm at a rate of 0.5 mm/s. Each hip was tested in the intact state and then sequentially under varying capsulotomy conditions: 2-cm interportal, 4-cm interportal, half-T (4-cm interportal and 2-cm T-capsulotomy), and full-T (4-cm interportal and 4-cm T-capsulotomy). After serial testing, isolated T-limb repair and then subsequent complete repair were performed. Repaired specimens underwent distraction testing as previously stated to assess the ability to restore hip stability to the native profile. Distraction force as well as the relative distraction force (percentage normalized to the intact capsule) were compared between all capsulotomy and repair conditions. Results: Increasing interportal capsulotomy size from 2 to 4 cm resulted in significantly less force required to distract the hip ( P < .001). The largest relative decrease in force was seen between the intact state (274.6 ± 71.2 N; 100%) and 2-cm interportal (209.7 ± 73.2 N; 76.4% ± 15.6%; P = .0008). There was no significant mean difference in distraction force when 4-cm interportal (160.4 ± 79.8 N) was converted to half-T (140.7 ± 73.5 N; P = .270) and then full-T (112.0 ± 70.2 N; P = .204). When compared with the intact state, isolated T-limb repair partially restored stability (177.3 ± 86.3 N; 63.5% ± 19.8%; P < .0001), while complete repair exceeded native values (331.7 ± 103.7 N; 122.7% ± 15.1%; P = .0008). Conclusion: The conversion of interportal capsulotomy to T-capsulotomy did not significantly affect the force required to distract the hip in a cadaveric model. However, larger interportal capsulotomies resulted in significant stepwise decreases in distraction force. When performing interportal or T-capsulotomy, the iliofemoral ligament strength is significantly decreased, but complete capsular repair demonstrated the ability to restore joint stability to the native, intact hip. Clinical Relevance: Increasing interportal capsulotomy size decreases the force required to distract the hip. In an effort to maximize visualization and minimize the magnitude of iliofemoral ligament fibers cut, many surgeons have moved from extended interportal capsulotomy to T-capsulotomy. Interportal and T-capsulotomies result in equivalent hip distraction, partial capsular repair marginally improves hip stability, and only complete repair has the ability to restore the hip to its native biomechanical profile.

Hip Distraction Without a Perineal Post: A Prospective Study of 1000 Hip Arthroscopy Cases

Background: Hip arthroscopy has traditionally been performed with a perineal post, resulting in various groin-related complications, including pudendal nerve neurapraxias, vaginal tears, and scrotal necrosis. Purpose: To assess the safety of a technique for hip distraction without the use of a perineal post. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We prospectively analyzed a consecutive cohort of 1000 hips presenting to a dedicated hip preservation clinic; all patients had hip pain and were subsequently treated with hip arthroscopy. Demographic variables, hip pathology, and lateral center edge angle were recorded for each case. In the operating room, the patient’s feet were placed in traction boots in a specifically designed distraction setup, and the operative table was placed in varying degrees of Trendelenburg. With this technique, enough resistance is created by gravity and friction between the patient’s body and the bed to allow for successful hip distraction without the need for a perineal post. In a subset of 309 hips (n = 281 patients), the degrees of Trendelenburg as well as the distraction force were analyzed. Results: The mean ± SD Trendelenburg angle used among the subset of 309 hips was 11° ± 2°. The mean initial distraction force necessary was 90 ± 28 lb, which decreased to 65 ± 24 lb by 30 minutes after traction initiation ( P < .0001). The most important variables in determining initial force for this cohort of patients were, in order of magnitude, sex ( P < .0001), weight ( P < .0001), and lateral center edge angle ( P < .01). No groin-related complications occurred among the entire cohort of patients, including soft tissue or nerve-related complications. The rate of deep venous thrombosis was 2 in 1000. Conclusion: The use of the Trendelenburg position and a specially designed distraction setup during hip arthroscopy allows for safe hip distraction without a perineal post, thereby eliminating groin-related soft tissue and nerve complications. Certain patient variables can be used to estimate the required distraction force and inclination angle with this method.