relative wave function
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaly Kuyukov

Gravity and relative wave function the universe



2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaly Kuyukov

Modern general theory of relativity considers gravity as the curvature of space-time. The theory is based on the principle of equivalence. All bodies fall with the same acceleration in the gravitational field, which is equivalent to locally accelerated reference systems. In this article, we will affirm the concept of gravity as the curvature of the relative wave function of the Universe. That is, a change in the phase of the universal wave function of the Universe near a massive body leads to a change in all other wave functions of bodies. The main task is to find the form of the relative wave function of the Universe, as well as a new equation of gravity for connecting the curvature of the wave function and the density of matter.



2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaly Kuyukov

Space-time is phase space the relative wave function universe.



2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (20n21) ◽  
pp. 3983-3998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip W. Anderson

After short comments on my early addenda to BCS — gauge invariance and the Anderson–Higgs mechanism, the dirty superconductor "theorem," and the spinor representation — I focus on the interaction mechanisms which cause electron–electron pairing. These bifurcate into two almost non-overlapping classes. In order to cause electrons to pair in spite of the strong, repulsive, instantaneous Coulomb vertex, the electrons can evade each others' propinquity on the same site at the same time either dynamically, by retaining Γ0 (s-wave) relative symmetry, but avoiding each other in time — called "dynamic screening" — or by assuming a non-symmetric relative wave function, avoiding each other in space. All simple metals and alloys, including all the (so far) technically useful superconductors, follow the former scheme. But starting with the first discovery of "heavy-electron" superconductors in 1979, and continuing with the "organics" and the magnetic transition metal compounds such as the cuprates and the iron pnictides, it appears that the second class may turn out to be numerically superior and theoretically more fascinating. The basic interaction in many of these cases appears to be the "kinetic exchange" or superexchange characteristic of magnetic insulators.



1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (05n06) ◽  
pp. 559-567
Author(s):  
W. H. DICKHOFF

The scattering process of nucleons in nuclear matter is studied. After a review of the conventional asymptotic analysis of the two-body propagator in coordinate space, the modifications of this analysis due to the dressing of the scattering nucleons is developed. While the scattering energy singles out a unique (on-shell) momentum in the relative wave function of free or mean-field nucleons, this uniqueness is lost for dressed nucleons. The resulting distribution of momenta in the corresponding relative wave function leads to a localization in coordinate space of the influence of the scattering process on the relative motion of nucleons. An analytic approximation to the noninteracting propagator of the dressed nucleons is utilized to illustrate these points. As a consequence of the localization the scattered wave is damped and the particles no longer remember their scattering event beyond some finite distance.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document