Non-GAAP Financial Measures: Evidence From Canada

This paper investigates non-GAAP financial measures voluntarily reported by Canadian companies listed on Toronto stock exchange (TSX) and Toronto Ventures Exchange (TSXV) for the year 2017. Non-GAAP measures are those that do not adhere to the requirements of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and are used to communicate those aspects of firms’ operations which the firms see as relevant for the users of financial statements. This study is an exploratory research which describes current firm practices in reporting non-GAAP financial measures among three industry groups, namely Real Estate, Blockchain/Cryptocurrency and Cannabis firms. This paper also assesses the quality of non-GAAP financial disclosures in accordance with the regulatory guidance. The study is motivated by recent regulatory proposals issued by the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), under the National Instrument NI 52-112 and by the Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) pertaining to reporting non-GAAP performance measures. The main contribution of this study is a detailed content analysis of a sample of Canadian firms. My analysis of hand collected data from the Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) indicates a plethora of reported “non-GAAP financial measures” disclosed by companies. The analysis also indicates that firms are falling short on parameters such as understandability, comparability, standardization, consistency and persistence of non-GAAP financial measures which are essential under the existing guidelines, and that regulation of non-GAAP financial measures would be beneficial. The study’s findings may be relevant to regulators for formulating guidance on reporting non-GAAP measures and identifies areas of potential future studies in the area of non-GAAP financial measures. Keywords: Non-GAAP financial measures, Non-GAAP earnings, Pro forma earnings, Non-IFRS measures, Street earnings, Core earnings, Adjusted earnings and NI 52-112.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures: Evidence From Canada

This paper investigates non-GAAP financial measures voluntarily reported by Canadian companies listed on Toronto stock exchange (TSX) and Toronto Ventures Exchange (TSXV) for the year 2017. Non-GAAP measures are those that do not adhere to the requirements of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and are used to communicate those aspects of firms’ operations which the firms see as relevant for the users of financial statements. This study is an exploratory research which describes current firm practices in reporting non-GAAP financial measures among three industry groups, namely Real Estate, Blockchain/Cryptocurrency and Cannabis firms. This paper also assesses the quality of non-GAAP financial disclosures in accordance with the regulatory guidance. The study is motivated by recent regulatory proposals issued by the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), under the National Instrument NI 52-112 and by the Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) pertaining to reporting non-GAAP performance measures. The main contribution of this study is a detailed content analysis of a sample of Canadian firms. My analysis of hand collected data from the Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) indicates a plethora of reported “non-GAAP financial measures” disclosed by companies. The analysis also indicates that firms are falling short on parameters such as understandability, comparability, standardization, consistency and persistence of non-GAAP financial measures which are essential under the existing guidelines, and that regulation of non-GAAP financial measures would be beneficial. The study’s findings may be relevant to regulators for formulating guidance on reporting non-GAAP measures and identifies areas of potential future studies in the area of non-GAAP financial measures. Keywords: Non-GAAP financial measures, Non-GAAP earnings, Pro forma earnings, Non-IFRS measures, Street earnings, Core earnings, Adjusted earnings and NI 52-112.

Alternative performance measures: An assessment after ESMA Guidelines

In July 2016, ESMA Guidelines that set out principles regarding the presentation of non-GAAP measures (ESMA Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures – APMs) became effective. The guidelines should reduce the mispricing caused by pro forma earnings, and improve investor protection and the transparency of financial information. We provide a preliminary assessment of the impact of these guidelines on 2016 reports on a sample of European Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) listed on regulated markets. Using univariate and multivariate regressions, we demonstrate a significant relationship between Alternative performance measures disclosed in the press releases and stock prices in the period after the ESMA Guidelines. APMs are relevant information for investors and more adherence to the ESMA reporting guidelines may generate a positive impact on stock prices and short-term returns. The findings also contribute to demonstrate that the European regulation about non-GAAP measures will reduce the asymmetry of information between users, particularly between capital owners and management, which may lead to increased users’ confidence since they will be able to evaluate more effectively issuers’ performance.

Do aggressive pro forma earnings-reporting firms have difficulty disclosing intellectual capital? Australian evidence

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether aggressive pro forma earnings-reporting firms are difficult in relation to signalling sufficient intellectual capital (IC), and how the market reacts to aggressive pro forma earnings reporting. Design/methodology/approach Content analysis of 610 annual reports of Australian firms listed on the Australian Securities Exchange 200 is used to obtain IC information. Fixed-effects logistic and ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions are used to examine the hypotheses. Findings The study finds that aggressive pro forma earnings reporting is negatively and significantly associated with sufficient IC disclosure. Moreover, this paper finds that investors react favourably to aggressive pro forma earnings reporting, and believe that pro forma earnings have greater incremental value-relevance information than statutory earnings. Research limitations/implications The coding framework used in this study comprises 33 IC items. Other studies have used coding frameworks comprising fewer or more varied IC items. Therefore, when comparing the results of this and other studies, the interpretation of the findings must recognise the differences in approach. Practical implications Sufficient IC disclosure may help investors to distinguish high-reporting-quality firms and low-reporting-quality firms. The paper demonstrates that aggressive pro forma earnings-reporting firms, which are low-reporting-quality firms, are less likely to disclose sufficient IC. Originality/value This paper is the first to examine the relationship between aggressive pro forma reporting and IC disclosure. Moreover, this paper built a theoretical framework based on signalling theory to develop research hypotheses, which extend the research on IC underpinned by signalling theory.

Extraordinary Items—An Elusive Concept

ABSTRACT Since the appearances of “extraordinary” gains and losses in the authoritative GAAP literature in 1917, the debate over how to report such items has continued for a century. Until the 1970s, the reporting of extraordinary items was widespread. During recent decades, however, the frequency of reported extraordinary items decreased sharply. Only 1.5 percent of companies reported them in 2014, followed in January 2015 by their elimination from U.S. GAAP. In this paper, we investigate factors affecting the decline in reporting of extraordinary items and reasons for their elimination from U.S. GAAP. Factors include evolving criteria for defining extraordinary items, variation in their financial statement placement, and their changing nature and size over the years. We examine several important FASB pronouncements and events that contributed to the elimination of extraordinary items, including APB Opinion No. 30 in 1973, the FASB's treatment of the losses from the World Trade Center attack in 2001, the FASB and IASB's convergence initiative, the FASB's simplification initiative, and widespread use of pro forma earnings in practice.

Pro Forma Earnings Presentation Effects and Investment Decisions

ABSTRACT Reacting to the criticism that companies routinely mislead investors by emphasizing non-GAAP or pro forma numbers, the SEC promulgated Regulation G in 2003, which requires firms to provide a reconciliation of the pro forma and GAAP numbers. In this study, we conduct an experiment to examine how investors' GAAP and non-GAAP earnings performance assessments affect their financial evaluations and investment decisions based on the presentation format of the reconciliation (presenting a full non-GAAP income statement, referred to as the full NGIS format, versus presenting only the items that caused the difference between GAAP and non-GAAP measures, referred to as the summary NGIS format). We find that even though a summary NGIS format for the reconciliation of pro forma earnings does not increase the perceived non-GAAP earnings performance, it does increase the weight given to non-GAAP earnings performance when making investment-related judgments and decisions, relative to a full NGIS format. These findings regarding the evaluation and weighting of non-GAAP earnings performance extend prior studies and suggest that non-GAAP earnings information may be processed differently based upon the format of the reconciliation. Further, our finding regarding the weighting of non-GAAP earnings performance is inconsistent with the concern expressed by the SEC that the full NGIS format may give greater prominence to non-GAAP information. Finally, the implications of these findings for regulators, investors, and future research are discussed. Data Availability: Contact the authors.

INFORMATION CONTENT OF PRO FORMA EARNINGS

An increasing number of firms release “pro forma” earnings along with net income in their financial reports in the press. The pro forma earnings are defined by individual firms which are different from the net income defined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Lougee and Marquardt (2004) indicated that companies with less informative GAAP earnings were more likely to engage in reporting pro forma earnings than others. This study examines whether the pro forma earnings provide information to investors about future earnings in the Taiwanese stocks market. A condition of information asymmetry exists between investors and managers, and pro forma earnings are a way to disclose the latter’s ideas about their firms’ future profitability to investors. The quality of the financial information that is provided will impact investors’ predictions about firms’ future earnings, and so affect stock prices. The purpose of this study is thus to investigate the information content of pro forma earnings, and examine whether pro forma earnings can provide details of future earnings to the investors in the Taiwanese stock market. We collect 3,287 firm-year observations listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange or Gre Tai Securities Market from 2008 to 2012, and our data is from the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) database. Our results show that the disclosure of pro forma earnings can improve the association between current returns and future earnings. This implies that the disclosure of pro forma earnings reveals credible information, which is then incorporated into current returns.