incomplete weight information
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

69
(FIVE YEARS 14)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Tehreem ◽  
Amjad Hussain ◽  
Ahmed Alsanad ◽  
Mogeeb A. A. Mosleh

This paper aims to propose a new methodology for spherical cubic fuzzy (SCF) multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) utilizing the TOPSIS method that uses incomplete weight information. At first, the maximum deviation model is suggested to determine the criteria of weight values. An MCDM methodology is introduced using SCF information, based on the proposed method. Also, to validate the effectiveness of the proposed information, a numerical example is given. Finally, a comprehensive and structured analysis of existing work in comparison with previous work is given.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Kai Zhang ◽  
Jing Zheng ◽  
Ying-Ming Wang

Case-based reasoning (CBR) is one of the most popular methods used in emergency decision making (EDM). Case retrieval plays a key role in EDM processes based on CBR and usually functions by retrieving similar historical cases using similarity measurements. Decision makers (DMs), thus, choose the most appropriate historical cases. Although uncertainty and fuzziness are present in the EDM process, in-depth research on these issues is still lacking. In this study, a heterogeneous multi-attribute case retrieval method based on group decision making (GDM) with incomplete weight information is developed. First, the case similarities between historical and target cases are calculated, and a set of similar historical cases is constructed. Six formats of case attributes are considered, namely crisp numbers, interval numbers, linguistic variables, intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, single-valued neutrosophic numbers (NNs) and interval-valued NNs. Next, the evaluation information from the DMs is expressed using single-valued NNs. Additionally, the evaluation utilities of similar historical cases are obtained by aggregating the evaluation information. The comprehensive utilities of similar historical cases are obtained using case similarities and evaluation utilities. In this process, the weights of incomplete information are determined by constructing optimization models. Furthermore, the most appropriate similar historical case is selected according to the comprehensive utilities. Finally, the proposed method is demonstrated using two examples; its performance is then compared with those of other similar methods to demonstrate its validity and efficacy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 106659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanbing Ju ◽  
Yuanyuan Liang ◽  
Martínez Luis ◽  
Aihua Wang ◽  
Chen-Fu Chien ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 6703
Author(s):  
Zhengmin Liu ◽  
Lin Li ◽  
Xiaolan Zhao ◽  
Linbin Sha ◽  
Di Wang ◽  
...  

Due to the uncertainty of natural factors and a larger global population, the work of supplying sustainable agricultural materials, especially green agricultural products, faces enormous challenges. How to effectively evaluate and select the most desirable green agricultural material supplier is an urgent issue for both agribusiness and government. In this paper, an integrated q-rung orthopair fuzzy (q-ROF) group best–worst method (GBWM) and the PROMETHEE II was introduced to availably solve such issue. Firstly, by taking similarity degree into account to solve incomplete weight information, a novel technique was constructed to determine the experts’ weight reasonably under the q-ROF context. Secondly, to improve consistency for group decision making and obtain a highly reliable selection result, the GBWM was used to derive criteria weights. Then, based on the proposed generalized p-norm knowledge-based score function, the PROMETHEE II was further improved to rank the feasible alternatives. After that, a representative case under the background of green agricultural material supplier selection was investigated in depth. Finally, the detailed comparative technique was conducted to verify the validity and superiority of the improved method.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 2285-2296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sajjad Ali Khan ◽  
Faisal Khan ◽  
Joseph Lemley ◽  
Saleem Abdullah ◽  
Fawad Hussain

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document