flock dynamics
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

14
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 106212 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.J. Farrell ◽  
P.R. Tozer ◽  
P.R. Kenyon ◽  
T. Ramilan ◽  
L.M. Cranston
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Hepworth ◽  
Kate yaxley ◽  
Daniel Baxter ◽  
Keith Joiner ◽  
Hussein Abbass

<p>Boids (bird-oids) is a widely used model to mimic the behaviour of birds. Shoids (sheep-oids) rely on the same boids rules with the addition of a repulsive force away from a sheepdog (a herding agent). Previous work assumed homogeneous shoids. Real-world observations of sheep show non-homogeneous responses to the presence of a herding agent. We present a portfolio of information-theoretic and spatial indicators to track the footprints of shoids with different parameters within the shoid flock. The portfolio is named the Centre of Influence to indicate that the aim is to identify the influential shoids with the highest impact on flock dynamics. We use both synthetic simulation-driven data and measurements collected from live sheep herding trials by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to validate the proposed measures. The resultant measures will allow us in our future research to design more efficient control strategies for the UAV, by polarising the attention of the machine learning algorithm on those shoids with influence footprints, to drive the flock to improve the herding of sheep.<br></p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Hepworth ◽  
Kate yaxley ◽  
Daniel Baxter ◽  
Keith Joiner ◽  
Hussein Abbass

<p>Boids (bird-oids) is a widely used model to mimic the behaviour of birds. Shoids (sheep-oids) rely on the same boids rules with the addition of a repulsive force away from a sheepdog (a herding agent). Previous work assumed homogeneous shoids. Real-world observations of sheep show non-homogeneous responses to the presence of a herding agent. We present a portfolio of information-theoretic and spatial indicators to track the footprints of shoids with different parameters within the shoid flock. The portfolio is named the Centre of Influence to indicate that the aim is to identify the influential shoids with the highest impact on flock dynamics. We use both synthetic simulation-driven data and measurements collected from live sheep herding trials by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to validate the proposed measures. The resultant measures will allow us in our future research to design more efficient control strategies for the UAV, by polarising the attention of the machine learning algorithm on those shoids with influence footprints, to drive the flock to improve the herding of sheep.<br></p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 116-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.R. Gowane ◽  
C.P. Swarnkar ◽  
S.S. Misra ◽  
Rajiv Kumar ◽  
Arun Kumar ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Hepworth ◽  
Kate yaxley ◽  
Daniel Baxter ◽  
Keith Joiner ◽  
Hussein Abbass

<div><div><div><p>Boids (Bird-oids) is a widely used model to mimic the behaviour of birds. Shoids (Sheep-oids) rely on the same boids rules with the addition of a repulsive force away from a sheepdog to model predation risk in predator-prey dynamic. Previous work assumed homogeneous shoids. Real-world observations on sheep show non-homogeneous responses to the presence of a herding agent. We present a portfolio of information-theoretic and spatial indicators to track the footprints of shoid with different parameters from the remainder of the shoid flock. The portfolio is named the Centre of Influence to indicate that the aim is to identify the influential shoids with the highest impact on flock dynamics. We use both synthetic simulation-driven data and measurements collected from actual sheep herding trial by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) to validate the proposed measures. The resultant footprints will allow us in our future research to design more efficient control strategies for the UAV to improve the herding of sheep, by polarising the attention of the machine learning algorithm on those Shoids with influence footprints to drive the flock.</p></div></div></div>


2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. 305-323
Author(s):  
Befikadu Zewdie ◽  
Mengistu Urge ◽  
Yosef Tadesse ◽  
Solomon Gizaw

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy A. Taylor ◽  
Dora Biro ◽  
Ben Lambert ◽  
James A. Walker ◽  
Graham K. Taylor ◽  
...  

AbstractFlapping flight is the most energetically demanding form of sustained forwards locomotion that vertebrates perform. Flock dynamics therefore have significant implications for energy expenditure. Despite this, no studies have quantified the biomechanical consequences of flying in a cluster flock relative to flying solo. Here, we compared the flight characteristics of homing pigeons (Columba livia) flying solo and in pairs, using high-precision 5 Hz GPS and 200 Hz tri-axial accelerometer biologgers. Paired flight increased route accuracy by ~7%, but, was accompanied by an increase in wingbeat frequency of ~18%. As expected, paired individuals benefitted from improved homing route accuracy, which reduced flight distance by ~7% and time by ~9%. However, realising these navigational gains involved substantial changes in flight kinematics and energetics. Both individuals in a pair increased their wingbeat frequency by c.18%, by decreasing the duration of their upstroke. This sharp increase in wingbeat frequency caused just a 3% increase in airspeed, but reduced the oscillatory displacement of the body by ~22%, which we hypothesise relates to an increased requirement for visual stability and manoeuvrability when flocking. Overall, the shorter flight distances and increased wingbeat frequency in a pair resulted in a net increase in the aerodynamic cost of returning home, which we estimate was ~14%. Our results demonstrate that flocking costs have been underestimated by an order of magnitude and force reinterpretation of their mechanistic origin. We show that, for pigeons, two heads are better than one, but keeping a steady head necessitates energetically costly kinematics.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 2159-2170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Espelosín ◽  
Leopoldo Acosta ◽  
Daniel Alonso

2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 899-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Y. Abdel - Moneim ◽  
A. M. Ahmed ◽  
Mona M. Ibrahim ◽  
M. M. Mokhtar
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document