Pairing symmetries in the Zeeman-coupled extended attractive Hubbard model

By introducing the possibility of equal- and opposite-spin pairings concurrently, we show that the ground state of the extended attractive Hubbard model (EAHM) exhibits rich phase diagrams with a variety of singlet, triplet, and mixed parity superconducting orders. We study the competition between these superconducting pairing symmetries invoking an unrestricted Hartree–Fock–Bogoliubov–de Gennes (HFBdG) mean-field approach, and we use the d-vector formalism to characterize the nature of the stabilized superconducting orders. We discover that, while all other types of orders are suppressed, a non-unitary triplet order dominates the phase space in the presence of an in-plane external magnetic field. We also find a transition between a non-unitary to unitary superconducting phase driven by the change in average electron density. Our results serve as a reference for identifying and understanding the nature of superconductivity based on the symmetries of the pairing correlations. The results further highlight that EAHM is a suitable effective model for describing most of the pairing symmetries discovered in different materials.

Charge instabilities of the extended attractive Hubbard model on the cubic lattice

The paramagnetic phase of the extended attractive Hubbard model on the cubic lattice is studied within the spin rotation invariant Kotliar-Ruckenstein slave boson representation at zero temperature. It is obtained that the quasiparticle residue of the Fermi liquid phase vanishes for all densities at an interaction strength slightly smaller than [Formula: see text] that signals the Brinkman–Rice transition, and that it weakly depends on density. While for vanishing non-local interaction parameters, homogeneous static charge instabilities are found in a rather narrow window centered around quarter filling and [Formula: see text], increasing them to [Formula: see text] results into a severe narrowing of this window. On the contrary, when all interaction parameters are attractive, for example for [Formula: see text], a large parameter range in which homogeneous static charge instabilities is found. Yet, this systematically happens inside the Fermi liquid phase.