triple rule out
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

100
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Fusaro ◽  
Damiano Caruso ◽  
Giovanni Tessarin ◽  
Domenico de Santis ◽  
Giovanni Balestriero ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Vincenzo Russo ◽  
Camilla Sportoletti ◽  
Giulia Scalas ◽  
Domenico Attinà ◽  
Francesco Buia ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of triple rule out computed tomography (TRO-CT) in an emergency radiology workflow by comparing the diagnostic performance of cardiovascular and general radiologists in the interpretation of emergency TRO-CT studies in patients with acute and atypical chest pain. Methods Between July 2017 and December 2019, 350 adult patients underwent TRO-CT studies for the assessment of atypical chest pain. Three radiologists with different fields and years of expertise (a cardioradiologist—CR, an emergency senior radiologist—SER, and an emergency junior radiologist—JER) retrospectively and independently reviewed all TRO-CT studies, by trans-axial and multiplanar reconstruction only. Concordance rates were then calculated using as reference blinded results from a different senior cardioradiologist, who previously evaluated studies using all available analysis software. Results Concordance rate was 100% for acute aortic syndrome (AAS) and pulmonary embolism (PE). About coronary stenosis (CS) for non-obstructive (<50%), CS concordance rates were 97.98%, 90.91%, and 97.18%, respectively, for CR, SER, and JER; for obstructive CS (>50%), concordance rates were respectively 88%, 85.7%, and 71.43%. Moreover, it was globally observed a better performance in the evaluation of last half of examinations compared with the first one. Conclusions Our study confirm the feasibility of the TRO-CT even in an Emergency Radiology department that cannot rely on a 24/7 availability of a dedicated skilled cardiovascular radiologist. The “undedicated” radiologists could exclude with good diagnostic accuracy the presence of obstructive stenosis, those with a clinical impact on patient management, without needing time-consuming software and/or reconstructions.


Author(s):  
Heiner Nebelung ◽  
Thomas Brauer ◽  
Danilo Seppelt ◽  
Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann ◽  
Ivan Platzek

Abstract Objectives The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of bolus-tracking ROI positioning on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) image quality. Methods In this retrospective monocentric study, all patients had undergone CCTA by step-and-shoot mode to rule out coronary artery disease within a cohort at intermediate risk. Two groups were formed, depending on ROI positioning (left atrium (LA) or ascending aorta (AA)). Each group contained 96 patients. To select pairs of patients, propensity score matching was used. Image quality with regard to coronary arteries as well as pulmonary arteries was evaluated using quantitative and qualitative scores. Results In terms of the coronary arteries, there was no significant difference between both groups using quantitative (SNR AA 14.92 vs. 15.46; p = 0.619 | SNR LM 19.80 vs. 20.30; p = 0.661 | SNR RCA 24.34 vs. 24.30; p = 0.767) or qualitative scores (4.25 vs. 4.29; p = 0.672), respectively. With regard to pulmonary arteries, we found significantly higher quantitative (SNR RPA 8.70 vs. 5.89; p < 0.001 | SNR LPA 9.06 vs. 6.25; p < 0.001) and qualitative scores (3.97 vs. 2.24; p < 0.001) for ROI positioning in the LA than for ROI positioning in the AA. Conclusions ROI positioning in the LA or the AA results in comparable image quality of CT coronary arteriography, while positioning in the LA leads to significantly higher image quality of the pulmonary arteries. These results support ROI positioning in the LA, which also facilitates triple-rule-out CT scanning. Key Points • ROI positioning in the left atrium or the ascending aorta leads to comparable image quality of the coronary arteries. • ROI positioning in the left atrium results in significantly higher image quality of the pulmonary arteries. • ROI positioning in the left atrium is feasible to perform triple-rule-out CTA.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. e190137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon S. Martin ◽  
Domenico Mastrodicasa ◽  
Marly van Assen ◽  
Carlo N. De Cecco ◽  
Richard R. Bayer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-203
Author(s):  
Richard A.P. Takx ◽  
Julian L. Wichmann ◽  
Katharina Otani ◽  
Carlo N. De Cecco ◽  
Christian Tesche ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marton-Popovici Monica ◽  
Béla Merkely ◽  
Bálint Szilveszter ◽  
Zsófia Dora Drobni ◽  
Pál Maurovich-Horvat

Background: Acute chest pain is one of the most common reasons for Emergency Department (ED) visits and hospital admissions. As this could represent the first symptom of a lifethreatening condition, urgent identification of the etiology of chest pain is of utmost importance in emergency settings. Such high-risk conditions that can present with acute chest pain in the ED include Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS), Pulmonary Embolisms (PE) and Acute Aortic Syndromes (AAS). Discussion: The concept of Triple Rule-out Computed Tomographic Angiography (TRO-CTA) for patients presenting with acute chest pain in the ED is based on the use of coronary computed tomographic angiography as a single imaging technique, able to diagnose or exclude three lifethreatening conditions in one single step: ACS, AAS and PE. TRO-CTA protocols have been proved to be efficient in the ED for diagnosis or exclusion of life-threatening conditions and for differentiation between various etiologies of chest pain, and application of the TRO-CTA protocol in the ED for acute chest pain of uncertain etiology has been shown to improve the further clinical evaluation and outcomes of these patients. Conclusion: This review aims to summarize the main indications and techniques used in TRO protocols in EDs, and the role of TRO-CTA protocols in risk stratification of patients with acute chest pain.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1314 ◽  
pp. 012221
Author(s):  
Bo Li ◽  
Tingting Gong ◽  
Jianqiu Wang ◽  
Biying Yuan ◽  
Jianhua Liu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-317
Author(s):  
AmandaH. Westfall ◽  
John Garrett

Emergency physicians often rely on a “triple-rule-out” computed tomography (CT) where image acquisition is timed to obtain image quality equivalent to dedicated coronary CT angiography, pulmonary CT angiography, and thoracic aorta CT angiography. This case highlights the importance of obtaining CT angiography dedicated to the aorta in the setting of high clinical suspicion for aortic disease if initial CT pulmonary angiogram is negative for aortic disease.


2019 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. e30-e32
Author(s):  
Dritan Useini ◽  
Zulfugar Taghiyev ◽  
Matthias Bechtel ◽  
Justus Strauch

AbstractThymomas are rare tumors that commonly lie in the anterior mediastinum. The arteries supplying thymomas branch from the internal thoracic arteries and their collaterals. This report presents a patient with huge mediastinal thymoma, whose sensational vascularization is ensured directly by a single dominant tributary branch of the left internal thoracic artery. After initially performed computed tomography angiography, the tumor was suspect to be vascularized from the right coronary artery. Triple-rule-out computed tomography scan was a key step for accurate radiologic diagnosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document