Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA): effect of bolus-tracking ROI positioning on image quality

Abstract Objectives The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of bolus-tracking ROI positioning on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) image quality. Methods In this retrospective monocentric study, all patients had undergone CCTA by step-and-shoot mode to rule out coronary artery disease within a cohort at intermediate risk. Two groups were formed, depending on ROI positioning (left atrium (LA) or ascending aorta (AA)). Each group contained 96 patients. To select pairs of patients, propensity score matching was used. Image quality with regard to coronary arteries as well as pulmonary arteries was evaluated using quantitative and qualitative scores. Results In terms of the coronary arteries, there was no significant difference between both groups using quantitative (SNR AA 14.92 vs. 15.46; p = 0.619 | SNR LM 19.80 vs. 20.30; p = 0.661 | SNR RCA 24.34 vs. 24.30; p = 0.767) or qualitative scores (4.25 vs. 4.29; p = 0.672), respectively. With regard to pulmonary arteries, we found significantly higher quantitative (SNR RPA 8.70 vs. 5.89; p < 0.001 | SNR LPA 9.06 vs. 6.25; p < 0.001) and qualitative scores (3.97 vs. 2.24; p < 0.001) for ROI positioning in the LA than for ROI positioning in the AA. Conclusions ROI positioning in the LA or the AA results in comparable image quality of CT coronary arteriography, while positioning in the LA leads to significantly higher image quality of the pulmonary arteries. These results support ROI positioning in the LA, which also facilitates triple-rule-out CT scanning. Key Points • ROI positioning in the left atrium or the ascending aorta leads to comparable image quality of the coronary arteries. • ROI positioning in the left atrium results in significantly higher image quality of the pulmonary arteries. • ROI positioning in the left atrium is feasible to perform triple-rule-out CTA.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality of Triple-Rule-Out Computed Tomography Angiography Between Conventional Helical Scanning and a Strategy Incorporating Sequential Scanning

The American Journal of Cardiology ◽

10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.038 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 107 (7) ◽

pp. 1093-1098 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Eric D. Manheimer ◽

M. Robert Peters ◽

Steven D. Wolff ◽

Mehreen A. Qureshi ◽

Prashanth Atluri ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Computed Tomography ◽

Image Quality ◽

Radiation Dose ◽

Computed Tomography Angiography ◽

Triple Rule Out ◽

Sequential Scanning ◽

Rule Out

Download Full-text

Radial self-navigated native magnetic resonance angiography in comparison to navigator-gated contrast-enhanced MRA of the entire thoracic aorta in an aortic patient collective

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ◽

10.1186/s12968-021-00774-9 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 23 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Martina Correa Londono ◽

Nino Trussardi ◽

Verena C. Obmann ◽

Davide Piccini ◽

Michael Ith ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Magnetic Resonance ◽

Image Quality ◽

Magnetic Resonance Angiography ◽

Thoracic Aorta ◽

Aortic Root ◽

Aortic Disease ◽

Ascending Aorta ◽

Scan Time ◽

Contrast Enhanced

Abstract Background The native balanced steady state with free precession (bSSFP) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) technique has been shown to provide high diagnostic image quality for thoracic aortic disease. This study compares a 3D radial respiratory self-navigated native MRA (native-SN-MRA) based on a bSSFP sequence with conventional Cartesian, 3D, contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) with navigator-gated respiration control for image quality of the entire thoracic aorta. Methods Thirty-one aortic native-SN-MRA were compared retrospectively (63.9 ± 10.3 years) to 61 CE-MRA (63.1 ± 11.7 years) serving as a reference standard. Image quality was evaluated at the aortic root/ascending aorta, aortic arch and descending aorta. Scan time was recorded. In 10 patients with both MRA sequences, aortic pathologies were evaluated and normal and pathologic aortic diameters were measured. The influence of artifacts on image quality was analyzed. Results Compared to the overall image quality of CE-MRA, the overall image quality of native-SN-MRA was superior for all segments analyzed (aortic root/ascending, p < 0.001; arch, p < 0.001, and descending, p = 0.005). Regarding artifacts, the image quality of native-SN-MRA remained superior at the aortic root/ascending aorta and aortic arch before and after correction for confounders of surgical material (i.e., susceptibility-related artifacts) (p = 0.008 both) suggesting a benefit in terms of motion artifacts. Native-SN-MRA showed a trend towards superior intraindividual image quality, but without statistical significance. Intraindividually, the sensitivity and specificity for the detection of aortic disease were 100% for native-SN-MRA. Aortic diameters did not show a significant difference (p = 0.899). The scan time of the native-SN-MRA was significantly reduced, with a mean of 05:56 ± 01:32 min vs. 08:51 ± 02:57 min in the CE-MRA (p < 0.001). Conclusions Superior image quality of the entire thoracic aorta, also regarding artifacts, can be achieved with native-SN-MRA, especially in motion prone segments, in addition to a shorter acquisition time.

Download Full-text

Image Quality of Coronary Arteries on Non-electrocardiography-gated High-Pitch Dual-Source Computed Tomography in Children with Congenital Heart Disease

Pediatric Cardiology ◽

10.1007/s00246-017-1675-9 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 38 (7) ◽

pp. 1393-1399 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Yuichiro Kanie ◽

Shuhei Sato ◽

Akihiro Tada ◽

Susumu Kanazawa

Keyword(s):

Computed Tomography ◽

Congenital Heart Disease ◽

Heart Disease ◽

Image Quality ◽

Coronary Arteries ◽

Congenital Heart ◽

High Pitch ◽

Dual Source ◽

Dual Source Computed Tomography

Download Full-text

Image quality and attenuation values of multidetector CT coronary angiography using high iodine-concentration contrast material: A comparison of the use of iopromide 300 and iopromide 370

QJM ◽

10.1093/qjmed/hcaa041.018 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

A K M Darwish ◽

M M Farouk ◽

H Hafez ◽

A Adel

Keyword(s):

Image Quality ◽

Pulmonary Artery ◽

Coronary Arteries ◽

Main Pulmonary Artery ◽

Iodine Concentration ◽

Ascending Aorta ◽

P Value ◽

Group A ◽

The Mean ◽

Attenuation Values

Abstract Background Iodine concentration is one of the main determinants of arterial enhancement in CTA, and current low-osmolar and iso-osmolar nonionic CM for intravascular administration still come in a handful of molecules, but a relatively wide range of different iodine concentrations. This gives the opportunity to optimize CTA protocols as a function of several factors such as patient characteristics, CT technology, and CM features in an attempt to maximize the diagnostic yield of CTA examinations while considering patient safety and avoiding unnecessary extra costs. Objective To compare image quality and attenuation values of multidetector CT coronary angiography (MDCT) between iopromide 300 and iopromide 370 and to evaluate whether the higher iodine contrast material has better image quality or not. Material and Methods Patients were prospectively enrolled and were randomized into two groups (group A, 30 patients received iopromide 300, iodine flux 1.2g I/s; group B, 30 patients received iomeprol 370, iodine flux 1.48g I/s). CT attenuation values were measured in the proximal end coronary arteries,ascending aorta and main pulmonary artery. The image quality of 15 coronary artery segments was graded by cardiologist in consensus with the use of a four-point scale (1 excellent enhancement to 4 poor enhancement). Non-parametric statistical approaches were used to compare the two groups. Results No statistically significant differences were found between the mean attenuation values (302 HU for iopromide 300 and 326 HU for iopromide 370, P = 0.175) in the coronary arteries in the two groups. The mean attenuation value of the proximal ascending aorta (AA)and main pulmonary artery (MPA) was found to be 345+/-63 HU and 241+/- 89 in group A respectively, whereas the mean attenuation value in proximal ascending aorta and main pulmonary artery in group B was found to be 348+/-74 and 238+/- 50 respectively. No significant difference was found between iopromide 300 and iopromide 370 in terms of contrast enhancement at the level of great arteries, P value AA = 0.826 and P value for MPA = 0.884. 92.9% of coronary arterial segments got score (range 1–2) in group A whereas 93.6 of coronary arterial segments got score (range 1-2) in group with no statistically significant difference P value = 0.755. Conclusion With the current CT technology iopromide 300 is not inferior to iopromide 370 in terms of coronary artery attenuation values and image quality. Iopromide 300 provides similar enhancement of coronary arteries and excellent image quality as compared with iopromide 370 using identical amount of total iodine with fewer cost and less estimated adverse effects owing to low iodine concentration of iopromide 300.

Download Full-text