Attenuation of Antibody Titers from 3 to 6 Months after the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine Depends on Sex, with Age and Smoking Risk Factors for Lower Antibody Titers at 6 Months

Objective: We aimed to determine antibody titers at six months and their percentage change from three to six months after the second dose of the BNT162b2 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech) and to explore clinical variables associated with titers in Japan. Methods: We enrolled 365 healthcare workers (250 women, 115 men) whose three-month antibody titers were analyzed in our previous study and whose blood samples were collected 183 ± 15 days after the second dose. Participant characteristics, collected previously, were used. The relationships of these factors with antibody titers at six months and percentage changes in antibody titers from three to six months were analyzed. Results: Median age was 44 years. Median antibody titer at six months was 539 U/mL. Older participants had significantly lower antibody titers (20s, 752 U/mL; 60s–70s, 365 U/mL). In age-adjusted analysis, smoking was the only factor associated with lower antibody titers. Median percentage change in antibody titers from three to six months was −29.4%. The only factor significantly associated with the percentage change in Ab titers was not age or smoking, but sex (women, −31.6%; men, −25.1%). Conclusion: The most important factors associated with lower antibody titers at six months were age and smoking, as at three months, probably reflecting their effect on peak antibody titers. However, the only factor significantly associated with the attenuation in Ab titers from three to six months was sex, which reduced the sex difference seen during the first three months. Antibody titers may be affected by different factors at different time points.

Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Exacerbations of Cystic Fibrosis

Background: Data are limited regarding the preferred antibiotics for treatment of acute pulmonary exacerbations (APEs) of cystic fibrosis (CF), when methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is suspected. Objective: To compare the rate of return to baseline lung function among individuals with APEs of CF treated with either vancomycin or linezolid. Methods: This retrospective study included individuals hospitalized for APEs of CF from May 1, 2015, to April 30, 2017 who were infected with MRSA and treated with vancomycin or linezolid. The primary outcome was the return to baseline lung function, as measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Descriptive and inferential statistics were used. All tests were 2-tailed with α set at 0.05. Results: A total of 122 encounters were included (vancomycin: n = 66; linezolid: n = 66). No difference existed in return to baseline FEV1 between vancomycin (53 [80.3%]) and linezolid (50 [75.8%]; P = 0.53); nor was there a difference in median percentage change in FEV1 from admission to follow-up between vancomycin (24.7%) and linezolid (20.7%; P = 0.61). Adverse drug events occurred more frequently in patient encounters treated with vancomycin (10 [15.2%]) compared with linezolid (2 [3%]; P = 0.002). Conclusion and Relevance: Our study observed no difference in the effectiveness of vancomycin compared with linezolid in terms of change in lung function for APEs of CF. The rate of adverse drug events was low. In individuals with CF infected with MRSA who are experiencing an APE, either vancomycin or linezolid appear to be viable treatment options.

Impact of Long-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Immature Platelet Count and Platelet Reactivity

The immature platelet count (IPC) is a potential marker of platelet reactivity. We assessed the relationship between IPC during chronic dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and the response to antiplatelet drugs (acetylsalycilic acid + clopidogrel/ticagrelor). We included 286 patients: 167 (58.4%) patients received ticagrelor and 119 (41.6%) received clopidogrel. At a median follow-up of 46.5 days, the variation in IPC displayed an absolute median (interquartile range [IQR]) of −11.9 × 103/µL (−182.7 to 160.8), corresponding to a median percentage change in IPC ([%ΔIPC] IQR) of −0.3% (−21.9% to 35.5%), with an increase in IPC levels in those on ticagrelor and a decrease in IPC levels in those on clopidogrel. We observed an inverse association of lower platelet reactivity at different tests and a higher increase in IPC ( r = −0.14, P = .04 for arachidonic acid test; r = −0.12, P = .05 for collagen test; and r = −0.13, P = .02 for adenosine diphosphate test [ADP]). The rate of poor effectiveness of ADP antagonists was the only independent predictor of a ΔIPC above the third tertile (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.55 [0.32-0.99]; P = .048). We showed that in patients treated with chronic DAPT, an increase in IPC is significantly related to lower levels of platelet reactivity.

Effects of Transdermal and Oral Oestrogen Replacement Therapy on C-Reactive Protein Levels in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial

SummaryTo investigate the effect of postmenopausal oral and transdermal hormone therapy on plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), we performed a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, 15-month study. One hundred and fifty-two healthy hysterectomised postmenopausal women received daily either placebo (n = 49), or transdermal 17 β-oestradiol (E2) 50 µg (tE2 group, n = 33), or oral E2 1 mg (oE2 group, n = 37), or oral E2 1 mg combined with gestodene 25 µg (oE2 + G group, n = 33) for thirteen 28-day treatment cycles, followed by four cycles placebo for each group. Data were collected at baseline and in cycles 4, 13 and 17. In cycle 13, CRP was significantly increased in the oE2 group compared to placebo (P = 0.004). The median percentage change from baseline versus placebo was +75% (P <0.001). In cycle 17, significantly lower values were observed in the oE2 group compared to cycle 13 and to the placebo group (-49%, P <0.001). There were no significant changes versus placebo in the other groups. In conclusion, oral E2 significantly increased CRP levels. This change was larger than the increase found during oral E2 + G. Transdermal E2 did not affect CRP levels.