Clinical Comparative Study on the Treatment of Inferior Pole Fractures of Patella by Double-row Anchor Suture Bridge Technique Combined with Kirschner Wire Tension Band Internal Fixation

Objective: To investigate the method, technique and clinical efficacy of double-row anchor suture bridge technique in the treatment of inferior pole fractures of patella, and to compare it with traditional Kirschner wire tension band internal fixation. Methods: General information A total of 62 patients were enrolled in this study, including 35 males and 27 females, aged 31-80 years old, with an average of (53.2±4) years old. All the patients were divided into two groups by a random double-blind method: Group A (double-row anchor suture bridge technique group) and Group B (Kirschner wire tension band internal fixation group), with 32 cases and 30 cases in each group, respectively. The two techniques were performed by the same group of doctors to fix the fracture respectively, and the intraoperative bleeding, operation time, incidence of postoperative complications, knee function score, etc., were compared between the two techniques. Results: Group A (double-row anchor suture bridge technique group): operation time 56-80min, with an average of (60±10) min; intraoperative blood loss 30-56ml, with an average of (43±10) ml. All incisions healed in one stage and stitches were removed after 2 weeks. No complications such as incision infection, flap necrosis and nerve injury occurred. The average healing time of the fracture was 12 weeks. At the last follow-up, the Bostman score was (28.5±3.3), and the excellent rate was 93.7%. Group B (Kirschner wire tension band internal fixation group): operation time 54-76min, with an average of (56±10) min; intraoperative blood loss 31-50ml, with an average of (43±80) ml. One patient developed delayed incision healing postoperatively. Four patients experienced Kirschner wire withdrawal, one of which was accompanied by infection. Two patients were found to have mild separation of distal fracture fragments, despite the fracture being fine. The average healing time of the fracture was 13 weeks. At the last follow-up, the Bostman score was (23.5±3.3), and the excellent rate was 86.7%. Conclusion: Double-row anchor suture bridge technique is applied to inferior pole fractures of patella by virtue of its various effects, such as the complete preservation of the inferior pole fragments during the operation, satisfactory fracture reduction, firm fixation, and meeting patients’ requirements for early postoperative ambulation. This technology is superior to traditional Kirschner wire tension band internal fixation owing to its advantages of no need to take out the internal fixation, firm fixation, no need to worry about Kirschner wire withdrawal and fewer complications, and its clinical efficacy satisfaction rate is also better than traditional surgical methods. In short, double-row anchor suture bridge technique is an ideal surgical procedure for the treatment of the inferior pole fracture of patella with safety, reliability and high satisfaction.

Bone suture anchor repair and functional outcome of a triceps tendon rupture, a rare clinical entity

Triceps tendon rupture is rare and easily missed on presentation. A 58-year-old man was seen in our accident and emergency department with an inability to extend his right elbow against gravity after he fell. Ultrasound and MRI confirmed the suspected diagnosis of a traumatic triceps tendon rupture and excluded additional injuries. Surgical repair was carried out by a bone anchor suture reinsertion of the tendon to the olecranon. After 2 weeks of cast immobilisation, an early active range of motion (ROM) rehabilitation schedule was followed, resulting in excellent elbow function at 12 weeks postoperatively.In conclusion, it is important to suspect this rare injury and use additional studies to confirm the diagnosis of triceps tendon rupture. Also, good clinical outcome with regards to function can be achieved using bone anchor suture repair and an early active ROM rehabilitation schedule.

Single Pulley Double-strand Anchor Suture Fixation of the Coronoid Process in Terrible Triad of the Elbow Injury

Background: Terrible triad of the elbow injury is difficult to manage, and the role of the coronoid process in instability is very important. We describe a simple, modified suture technique to fix a coronoid process fragment using suture anchor fixation.Methods: Eight patients (3 female and 5 male) with coronoid process injuries with the fragment involving <50% of the total height (Reagan-Morrey type I/II) in terrible triad of elbow injury were included. Patients were treated operatively via a lateral Kocher’s approach, and coronoid process fractures were repaired with a single pulley double-strand suture technique. Structures were addressed in a sequential fashion—the coronoid process, radial head, lateral ulnar collateral ligament.Results: All patients were treated with the single pulley double-strand anchor suture technique and the coronoid process fragment was found to be in good contact with the original avulsion site using the method. The final Mayo Elbow Performance Score was excellent (> 90) in 6 patients and good (between 85 and 89) in 2 patients.Conclusions: The single pulley double-strand suture tie method using a suture anchor is a less invasive and simpler fixation method for the repair of coronoid process fractures in patients with terrible triad of the elbow injuries, and results in good outcomes. Level of evidence: Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study

Preliminary clinical outcomes of the double-row anchor suture-bridge technique for the fixation of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures in adults: a 12-months minimal follow-up

Background Tibial intercondylar eminence avulsion fractures occur primarily in adolescents and young adults. However, the incidence of such fractures is increasing in adults, concurrent with an increase in sports injuries and traffic accidents. This study describes the fixation-based double-row anchor suture-bridge technique, a novel technique for treating tibial intercondylar eminence fractures in adults; and evaluates its preliminary clinical outcomes. Methods A retrospective evaluation of adult patients with tibial intercondylar eminence fractures treated at our institution from June 2016 to June 2018 was conducted. Seven such patients, treated with the anchor suture-bridge technique, were included. All patients were assessed for knee joint range of motion (ROM), Lysholm knee score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score, Tegner activity score pre-surgery, and the healing of the fracture at 3, 6 and 12 months minimal post-surgery follow-up. Results Patients were followed for a mean of 12.43 months (range 9-15 months). By the final follow-up, all fractures had fully healed. The mean Lysholm score improved from 27.86 (range, 2 to 54) pre-surgery to 88.14 (range, 81 to 100) 3 months post-surgery (p < 0.05). Similarly, the mean IKDC score improved from 48.86 (range, 43 to 55) to 84.29 (range, 75 to 90) (P < 0.05); and the mean Tegner activity score improved from 1.71 (range, 0 to 4) to 3.29 (range, 2 to 4) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, knee joint ROM, Lysholm scores, IKDC scores, and Tegner activity scores displayed excellent outcomes at the 6 and 12 months minimal follow-up. Conclusion The arthroscopic anchor suture-bridge technique is a valid and secure method for achieving effective fixation of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures in adults.

Surgical management of ulnar styloid fractures: comparison of fixation with anchor suture and tension band wire

Background: Limited reference is available regarding surgical management in symptomatic ulnar styloid fractures with small bony avulsion. The study goal is to report the surgical outcomes using anchor suture fixation with comparison to traditional tension band wire fixation.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records in patients who underwent surgical repair for unilateral ulnar styloid fractures with distal radioulnar instability between 2004 and 2017. A total of 31 patients were enrolled including two kinds of fixation methods. Anchor suture fixation plus distal radioulnar joint pinning was performed in ten patients with tiny avulsion bony fragments (group A); tension band wire fixation was performed in 21 patients with big styloid fracture fragments (group B). Patient characteristics and 2-year treatment outcomes were compared between two groups based on Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), visual analog scale (VAS) and surgical complication. Descriptive statistics were used for calculation of key variables; a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Based on Gaulke classification, there were five subtypes in group A and three subtypes in group B. Incidence of concomitant distal radius fractures was significantly higher in group B; other patient characteristics including age, sex, injury side, and time to surgery showed no significant difference. Outcome assessment regarding MMWS, QuickDASH and VAS was comparable between two groups. Bone-related complications including nonunion, DRUJ subluxation and styloid resorption were analyzed; the difference was not significant. Incidence of implant-related complications including migration and secondary removal surgery was significantly higher in group B (p = 0.021). Conclusion: Surgical fixation in symptomatic ulnar styloid fractures yields comparable treatment outcomes in both fracture patterns. Implant-related complication with secondary removal surgery is more common in tension band wire group. Anchor suture fixation is a feasible option for tiny styloid avulsion fragments with limited surgical complication.

Surgical management of ulnar styloid fractures: comparison of fixation with anchor suture and tension band wire

Background Limited reference is available regarding surgical management in symptomatic ulnar styloid fractures with small bony avulsion. The study goal is to report the surgical outcomes using anchor suture fixation with comparison to traditional tension band wire fixation. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records in patients who underwent surgical repair for unilateral ulnar styloid fractures with distal radioulnar instability between 2004 and 2017. A total of 31 patients were enrolled including two kinds of fixation methods. Anchor suture fixation plus distal radioulnar joint pinning was performed in ten patients with tiny avulsion bony fragments (group A); tension band wire fixation was performed in 21 patients with big styloid fracture fragments (group B). Patient characteristics and 2-year treatment outcomes were compared between two groups based on Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), visual analog scale (VAS) and surgical complication. Descriptive statistics were used for calculation of key variables; a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Based on Gaulke classification, there were five subtypes in group A and three subtypes in group B. Incidence of concomitant distal radius fractures was significantly higher in group B; other patient characteristics including age, sex, injury side, and time to surgery showed no significant difference. Outcome assessment regarding MMWS, QuickDASH and VAS was comparable between two groups. Bone-related complications including nonunion, DRUJ subluxation and styloid resorption were analyzed; the difference was not significant. Incidence of implant-related complications including migration and secondary removal surgery was significantly higher in group B (p = 0.021). Conclusion Surgical fixation in symptomatic ulnar styloid fractures yields comparable treatment outcomes in both fracture patterns. Implant-related complication with secondary removal surgery is more common in tension band wire group. Anchor suture fixation is a feasible option for tiny styloid avulsion fragments with limited surgical complication.