prey capture behavior
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

50
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Neuron ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 320-337.e6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Yoshimatsu ◽  
Cornelius Schröder ◽  
Noora E. Nevala ◽  
Philipp Berens ◽  
Tom Baden

Neuron ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-209
Author(s):  
Johan Westö ◽  
Petri Ala-Laurila

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 627-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella M Najm ◽  
Angelika Pe ◽  
Jonathan N Pruitt ◽  
Noa Pinter-Wollman

Abstract Animals often face conflicting demands when making movement decisions. To examine the decision process of social animals, we evaluated nest-site preferences of the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola. Colonies engage in collective web building, constructing 3D nests and 2D capture webs on trees and fences. We examined how individuals and groups decide where to construct a nest based on habitat structure and conspecific presence. Individuals had a strong preference for 3D substrates and conspecific presence. Groups were then provided with conflicting options of 3D substrates versus 2D substrates with a conspecific. Groups preferred the 3D structures without presettled conspecifics over a 2D substrate with conspecifics. When a group fragmented and individuals settled on both substrates, the minority group eventually joined the majority. Before rejoining, the collective prey capture behavior of divided groups improved with the size of the majority fragment. The costs of slow responses to prey for split groups and weak conspecific attraction may explain why dispersal is rare in these spiders.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (23) ◽  
pp. 4130-4138.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Hoy ◽  
Hannah I. Bishop ◽  
Cristopher M. Niell

2018 ◽  
Vol 441 (2) ◽  
pp. 328-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Lloyd ◽  
Courtney Olive ◽  
Bethany A. Stahl ◽  
James B. Jaggard ◽  
Paloma Amaral ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thaiany M. Costa ◽  
Norton F. S. Silva ◽  
Rodrigo H. Willemart

eLife ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia L Semmelhack ◽  
Joseph C Donovan ◽  
Tod R Thiele ◽  
Enrico Kuehn ◽  
Eva Laurell ◽  
...  

Zebrafish larvae show characteristic prey capture behavior in response to small moving objects. The neural mechanism used to recognize objects as prey remains largely unknown. We devised a machine learning behavior classification system to quantify hunting kinematics in semi-restrained animals exposed to a range of virtual stimuli. Two-photon calcium imaging revealed a small visual area, AF7, that was activated specifically by the optimal prey stimulus. This pretectal region is innervated by two types of retinal ganglion cells, which also send collaterals to the optic tectum. Laser ablation of AF7 markedly reduced prey capture behavior. We identified neurons with arbors in AF7 and found that they projected to multiple sensory and premotor areas: the optic tectum, the nucleus of the medial longitudinal fasciculus (nMLF) and the hindbrain. These findings indicate that computations in the retina give rise to a visual stream which transforms sensory information into a directed prey capture response.


2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e27930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijin Chin ◽  
Arthur YC Chung ◽  
Charles Clarke

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document