subantarctic fur seals
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

39
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
L Reisfeld ◽  
NCCA Fernandes ◽  
A Sarmiento ◽  
P Canedo ◽  
F Salvagni ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 1451142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan R. Reisinger ◽  
Marietjie Landman ◽  
Nonkoliso Mgibantaka ◽  
Malcolm J. Smale ◽  
Marthán N. Bester ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Pacoureau ◽  
Matthieu Authier ◽  
Karine Delord ◽  
Christophe Guinet ◽  
Christophe Barbraud

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e0152370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Kirkman ◽  
Dawit G. Yemane ◽  
Tarron Lamont ◽  
Michael A. Meÿer ◽  
Pierre A. Pistorius

2016 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. fiw029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline Weber Medeiros ◽  
Adriana Giongo ◽  
Fernanda P. Valdez ◽  
Derek Blaese de Amorin ◽  
Maurício Tavares ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 568-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Hocking ◽  
Erich M. G. Fitzgerald ◽  
Marcia Salverson ◽  
Alistair R. Evans

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wege ◽  
M. Nevoux ◽  
P.J.N. de Bruyn ◽  
M.N. Bester

AbstractObserver-based studies often underestimate key ecological parameters. Here a fresh approach was used to analyse six years (2006–11) of attendance cycles to estimate foraging trip lengths of a lactating flipper-tagged otariid: subantarctic fur seals at Marion Island. Multi-state mark-recapture models were used to calculate detection failures of females, correct estimates accordingly, and investigate the effects of year, season, pup sex and the presence of a telemetry device on attendance cycle parameters. There were no differences between corrected and uncorrected attendance data. This is attributed to the high capture probability across all seasons (range: 83–98%). This illustrates that observer-based studies are useful to augment telemetry studies. Only season and pup sex had a significant impact on female provisioning rates. In winter, foraging trip durations were longer (t-value=25.22,P<0.0001) and attendance durations shorter (t-value=-2.15,P=0.01) than during summer. Females with female pups spent a higher proportion of their time on land (χ2=6.6,P<0.05). Male pups have higher growth demands and are larger which suggests they can deplete female milk-stores faster.


2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter D. Shaughnessy ◽  
Catherine M. Kemper ◽  
David Stemmer ◽  
Jane McKenzie

Two fur seal species breed on the southern coast of Australia: the Australian fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) and the New Zealand fur seal (A. forsteri). Two other species are vagrants: the subantarctic fur seal (A. tropicalis) and the Antarctic fur seal (A. gazella). We document records of vagrant fur seals in South Australia from 1982 to 2012 based primarily on records from the South Australian Museum. There were 86 subantarctic fur seals: 49 specimens and 37 sightings. Most (77%) were recorded from July to October and 83% of all records were juveniles. All but two specimens were collected between July and November. Sightings were prevalent during the same period, but there were also nine sightings during summer (December–February), several of healthy-looking adults. Notable concentrations were near Victor Harbor, on Kangaroo Island and Eyre Peninsula. Likely sources of subantarctic fur seals seen in South Australia are Macquarie and Amsterdam Islands in the South Indian Ocean, ~2700 km south-east and 5200 km west of SA, respectively. There were two sightings of Antarctic fur seals, both of adults, on Kangaroo Island at New Zealand fur seal breeding colonies. Records of this species for continental Australia and nearby islands are infrequent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document