insulin delivery system
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

178
(FIVE YEARS 68)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2021 ◽  
pp. cd210083
Author(s):  
Cari Berget ◽  
Jennifer L. Sherr ◽  
Daniel J. DeSalvo ◽  
Ryan S. Kingman ◽  
Sheri L. Stone ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 101294
Author(s):  
Coralie Amadou ◽  
Sylvia Franc ◽  
Erik Huneker ◽  
Guillaume Charpentier ◽  
Alfred Penfornis

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. e243522
Author(s):  
Khulood Bukhari ◽  
Rana Malek

A 40-year-old woman used an open-source automated insulin delivery system to manage her type 1 diabetes (T1D) prior to conception. The code for building the iPhone application called ‘Loop’ that carried the software for the hybrid closed-loop controller was available online. Her glycated hemoglobin before conception was 6.4%. Between 6 and 12 weeks gestation, she spent 66% time-in-range (TIR), 28% time-above-range (TAR) and 6% time-below-range (TBR). Between 18 and 24 weeks gestation, she spent 68% TIR, 27% TAR and 5% TBR. During her third trimester, she spent 72% TIR, 21% TAR and 7% TBR. She delivered a healthy infant with no neonatal complications. Clinicians should be aware of this technology as it gains traction in the T1D community and seeks Food and Drug Administration approval.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue A. Brown ◽  
Gregory P. Forlenza ◽  
Bruce W. Bode ◽  
Jordan E. Pinsker ◽  
Carol J. Levy ◽  
...  

<b>Objective:</b> Advances in diabetes technology have transformed the treatment paradigm for type 1 diabetes, yet the burden of disease is significant. We report on a pivotal, safety study of the first tubeless, on-body automated insulin delivery system with customizable glycemic targets. <p><b>Research Design and Methods: </b>This single-arm, multicenter, prospective study enrolled 112 children (6-13.9 years) and 129 adults (14-70 years). A two-week standard therapy phase (usual insulin regimen) was followed by 3 months of automated insulin delivery. Primary safety outcomes were incidence of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis. Primary effectiveness outcomes were change in HbA1c and percent time in sensor glucose range 70-180mg/dL. </p> <p><b>Results: </b>235 participants (98% of enrolled: 111 children, 124 adults) completed the study. HbA1c was significantly reduced in children by 0.71% (7.8mmol/mol) (mean±standard deviation: 7.67±0.95% to 6.99±0.63%, 60±10.4mmol/mol to 53±6.9mmol/mol, <i>p</i><0.0001) and in adults by 0.38% (4.2mmol/mol) (7.16±0.86% to 6.78±0.68%, 55±9.4mmol/mol to 51±7.4mmol/mol, <i>p</i><0.0001). Time in range was improved from standard therapy by 15.6±11.5% or 3.7 hours/day in children and 9.3±11.8% or 2.2 hours/day in adults (both <i>p</i><0.0001). This was accomplished with a reduction in time in hypoglycemia <70mg/dL among adults (median (interquartile range): 2.00% (0.63, 4.06) to 1.09% (0.46, 1.75), <i>p</i><0.0001), while this parameter remained the same in children. There were 3 severe hypoglycemia events not attributable to automated insulin delivery malfunction and 1 diabetic ketoacidosis event from an infusion site failure.<a></a><a></a></p> <p><b>Conclusions: </b>This tubeless automated insulin delivery system was safe, and allowed participants to significantly improve HbA1c levels and time in target glucose range with a very low occurrence of hypoglycemia.<br> </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document