wind farm layout optimization
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

142
(FIVE YEARS 67)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 5)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Allen ◽  
Lewis Cameron ◽  
Thomas R. Wainwright ◽  
Daniel J. Poole

2021 ◽  
pp. 014459872110569
Author(s):  
Zhaohui Luo ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
Junhang Xie ◽  
Jian Xu ◽  
Longyan Wang

The utilization of wind energy has attracted extensive attentions in the last few decades around the world, providing a sustainable and clean source to generate electricity. It is a common phenomenon of wake interference among wind turbines and hence the optimization of wind farm layout is of great importance to improve the wind turbine yields. More specifically, the accuracy of the three-dimensional wake model is critical to the optiamal design of a real wind farm layout considering the combinatorial effect of wind turbine interaction and topography. In this paper, a novel learning-based three-dimensional wake model is proposed and subsequently validated by comparison to the high-fidelity wake simulation results. Moreover, due to the fact that the inevitable deviation of actual wind scenario from the anticipated one can greatly jeopardize the wind farm optimization outcome, the inaccuracy of wind condition prediction using the existing meteorologic data with limited-time measurement is incorporated into the optimization study. Different scenarios including short-, medium-, and long-term wind data are studied specifically with the wind speed/direction prediction errors of [Formula: see text] 0.25 m/s, [Formula: see text] 5.62 [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] 0.08 m/s, [Formula: see text] 1.75 [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] 0.025 m/s, [Formula: see text] 0.56 [Formula: see text], respectively. An advanced objective function which simultaneously maximizes the power output and minimizes the power variance is employed for the optimization study. Through comparison, it is found that the optimized wind farm layout yields over 210 kW more total power output on average than the existed wind farm layout, which verifies the effectiveness of the wind farm layout optimization tool. The results show that as the measurement time for predicting the wind condition gets longer, the total wind farm power output average increases while the error of power output prediction decreases. For the wind farm with 20 wind turbines installed, the individual power output is above 500 kW with an error of 90 kW under the short-term wind [Formula: see text] 0.25 m/s, [Formula: see text] 5.62 [Formula: see text], while it is above 530 kW with an error of 10 kW under the long-term wind [Formula: see text] 0.025 m/s, [Formula: see text] 0.56 [Formula: see text].


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Puyi Yang ◽  
Hamidreza Najafi

Abstract The accuracy of analytical wake models applied in wind farm layout optimization (WFLO) problems is of great significance as the high-fidelity methods such as large eddy simulation (LES) and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) are still not able to handle an optimization problem for large wind farms. Based on a variety of analytical wake models developed in the past decades, Flow Redirection and Induction in Steady State (FLORIS) have been published as a tool that integrated several widely used wake models and their expansions. This paper compares four wake models selected from FLORIS by applying three classical WFLO scenarios. The results illustrate that the Jensen wake model is the fastest, but the issue of underestimating the velocity deficit is obvious. The Multi-zone model needs additional tuning on the parameters inside the model to fit specific wind turbines. The Gaussian-curl hybrid (GCH) wake model, as an advanced expansion of the Gaussian wake model, does not perform an observable improvement in the current study, where the yaw control is not included. The Gaussian wake model is recommended for the WFLO projects implemented under the FLROIS framework and has similar wind conditions with the present work.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document