wake model
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

385
(FIVE YEARS 130)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 7)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Becker ◽  
Bastian Ritter ◽  
Bart Doekemeijer ◽  
Daan van der Hoek ◽  
Ulrich Konigorski ◽  
...  

Abstract. In this paper a new version of the FLOw Redirection and Induction Dynamics (FLORIDyn) model is presented. The new model uses the three-dimensional parametric Gaussian FLORIS model and can provide dynamic wind farm simulations at low computational cost under heterogeneous and changing wind conditions. Both FLORIS and FLORIDyn are parametric models which can be used to simulate wind farms, evaluate controller performance and can serve as a control-oriented model. One central element in which they differ is in their representation of flow dynamics: FLORIS neglects these and provides a computationally very cheap approximation of the mean wind farm flow. FLORIDyn defines a framework which utilizes this low computational cost of FLORIS to simulate basic wake dynamics: this is achieved by creating so called Observation Points (OPs) at each time step at the rotor plane which inherit the turbine state. In this work, we develop the initial FLORIDyn framework further considering multiple aspects. The underlying FLORIS wake model is replaced by a Gaussian wake model. The distribution and characteristics of the OPs are adapted to account for the new parametric model, but also to take complex flow conditions into account. To achieve this, a mathematical approach is developed to combine the parametric model and the changing, heterogeneous world conditions and link them with each OP. We also present a computational lightweight wind field model to allow for a simulation environment in which heterogeneous flow conditions are possible. FLORIDyn is compared to SOWFA simulations in three- and nine-turbine cases under static and changing environmental conditions.The results show a good agreement with the timing of the impact of upstream state changes on downstream turbines. They also show a good agreement in terms of how wakes are displaced by wind direction changes and when the resulting velocity deficit is experienced by downstream turbines. A good fit of the mean generated power is ensured by the underlying FLORIS model. In the three turbine case, FLORIDyn simulates 4 s simulation time in 24.49 ms computational time. The resulting new FLORIDyn model proves to be a computationally attractive and capable tool for model based dynamic wind farm control.


2021 ◽  
Vol 933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Majid Bastankhah ◽  
Carl R. Shapiro ◽  
Sina Shamsoddin ◽  
Dennice F. Gayme ◽  
Charles Meneveau

Motivated by the need for compact descriptions of the evolution of non-classical wakes behind yawed wind turbines, we develop an analytical model to predict the shape of curled wakes. Interest in such modelling arises due to the potential of wake steering as a strategy for mitigating power reduction and unsteady loading of downstream turbines in wind farms. We first estimate the distribution of the shed vorticity at the wake edge due to both yaw offset and rotating blades. By considering the wake edge as an ideally thin vortex sheet, we describe its evolution in time moving with the flow. Vortex sheet equations are solved using a power series expansion method, and an approximate solution for the wake shape is obtained. The vortex sheet time evolution is then mapped into a spatial evolution by using a convection velocity. Apart from the wake shape, the lateral deflection of the wake including ground effects is modelled. Our results show that there exists a universal solution for the shape of curled wakes if suitable dimensionless variables are employed. For the case of turbulent boundary layer inflow, the decay of vortex sheet circulation due to turbulent diffusion is included. Finally, we modify the Gaussian wake model by incorporating the predicted shape and deflection of the curled wake, so that we can calculate the wake profiles behind yawed turbines. Model predictions are validated against large-eddy simulations and laboratory experiments for turbines with various operating conditions.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (24) ◽  
pp. 8313
Author(s):  
Xin Liu ◽  
Lailong Li ◽  
Shaoping Shi ◽  
Xinming Chen ◽  
Songhua Wu ◽  
...  

Huaneng Rudong 300 MW offshore wind farm project is located in eastern China. The wake effect is one of the major concerns for wind farm operators, as all 70 units are plotted in ranks, and the sea surface roughness is low. This paper investigated the wake intensity by combining a field test and a numerical simulation. To carry out further yaw optimization, a Gaussian wake model was adopted. Firstly, a 3D Light Detection and Ranging device (LiDAR) was used to capture the features in both horizontal and vertical directions of the wake. It indicated that Gaussian wake model can precisely predict the characteristics under time average and steady state in the wind farm. The predicted annual energy production (AEP) of the whole wind farm by the Gaussian model is compared with the calculation result of the actuator line (AL)-based LES method, and the difference between the two methods is mostly under 10%.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1521-1531
Author(s):  
Paul Fleming ◽  
Michael Sinner ◽  
Tom Young ◽  
Marine Lannic ◽  
Jennifer King ◽  
...  

Abstract. In this article, the authors present a test of wake steering at a commercial wind farm. A single fixed yaw offset, rather than an optimized offset schedule, is alternately applied to an upstream wind turbine, and the effect on downstream turbines is analyzed. This experimental design allows for comparison with engineering wake models independent of the controller's ability to track a varying offset and correctly measure wind direction. Additionally, by applying the same offset in beneficial and detrimental conditions, we are able to collect important data for assessing second-order wake model predictions. Results of the article from collected data show good agreement with the FLOw Redirection and Induction in Steady State (FLORIS) engineering model and offer support for the asymmetry of wake steering predicted by newer models, such as the Gauss–curl hybrid model.


2021 ◽  
pp. 014459872110569
Author(s):  
Zhaohui Luo ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
Junhang Xie ◽  
Jian Xu ◽  
Longyan Wang

The utilization of wind energy has attracted extensive attentions in the last few decades around the world, providing a sustainable and clean source to generate electricity. It is a common phenomenon of wake interference among wind turbines and hence the optimization of wind farm layout is of great importance to improve the wind turbine yields. More specifically, the accuracy of the three-dimensional wake model is critical to the optiamal design of a real wind farm layout considering the combinatorial effect of wind turbine interaction and topography. In this paper, a novel learning-based three-dimensional wake model is proposed and subsequently validated by comparison to the high-fidelity wake simulation results. Moreover, due to the fact that the inevitable deviation of actual wind scenario from the anticipated one can greatly jeopardize the wind farm optimization outcome, the inaccuracy of wind condition prediction using the existing meteorologic data with limited-time measurement is incorporated into the optimization study. Different scenarios including short-, medium-, and long-term wind data are studied specifically with the wind speed/direction prediction errors of [Formula: see text] 0.25 m/s, [Formula: see text] 5.62 [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] 0.08 m/s, [Formula: see text] 1.75 [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] 0.025 m/s, [Formula: see text] 0.56 [Formula: see text], respectively. An advanced objective function which simultaneously maximizes the power output and minimizes the power variance is employed for the optimization study. Through comparison, it is found that the optimized wind farm layout yields over 210 kW more total power output on average than the existed wind farm layout, which verifies the effectiveness of the wind farm layout optimization tool. The results show that as the measurement time for predicting the wind condition gets longer, the total wind farm power output average increases while the error of power output prediction decreases. For the wind farm with 20 wind turbines installed, the individual power output is above 500 kW with an error of 90 kW under the short-term wind [Formula: see text] 0.25 m/s, [Formula: see text] 5.62 [Formula: see text], while it is above 530 kW with an error of 10 kW under the long-term wind [Formula: see text] 0.025 m/s, [Formula: see text] 0.56 [Formula: see text].


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Puyi Yang ◽  
Hamidreza Najafi

Abstract The accuracy of analytical wake models applied in wind farm layout optimization (WFLO) problems is of great significance as the high-fidelity methods such as large eddy simulation (LES) and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) are still not able to handle an optimization problem for large wind farms. Based on a variety of analytical wake models developed in the past decades, Flow Redirection and Induction in Steady State (FLORIS) have been published as a tool that integrated several widely used wake models and their expansions. This paper compares four wake models selected from FLORIS by applying three classical WFLO scenarios. The results illustrate that the Jensen wake model is the fastest, but the issue of underestimating the velocity deficit is obvious. The Multi-zone model needs additional tuning on the parameters inside the model to fit specific wind turbines. The Gaussian-curl hybrid (GCH) wake model, as an advanced expansion of the Gaussian wake model, does not perform an observable improvement in the current study, where the yaw control is not included. The Gaussian wake model is recommended for the WFLO projects implemented under the FLROIS framework and has similar wind conditions with the present work.


Author(s):  
Ning Li ◽  
Yongqian Liu ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Hang Meng ◽  
Shuang Han ◽  
...  

Energy ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 122456
Author(s):  
Zhikun Dong ◽  
Yaoran Chen ◽  
Dai Zhou ◽  
Jie Su ◽  
Zhaolong Han ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document