inguinal disruption
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

11
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Matthew J Kraeutler ◽  
Omer Mei-Dan ◽  
Iciar M Dávila Castrodad ◽  
Toghrul Talishinskiy ◽  
Edward Milman ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT In recent years, there has been increased awareness and treatment of groin injuries in athletes. These injuries have been associated with various terminologies including sports hernia, core muscle injury (CMI), athletic pubalgia and inguinal disruption, among others. Treatment of these injuries has been performed by both orthopaedic and general surgeons and may include a variety of procedures such as rectus abdominis repair, adductor lengthening, abdominal wall repair with or without mesh, and hip arthroscopy for the treatment of concomitant femoroacetabular impingement. Despite our increased knowledge of these injuries, there is still no universal terminology, diagnostic methodology or treatment for a CMI. The purpose of this review is to present a detailed treatment algorithm for physicians treating patients with signs and symptoms of a CMI. In doing so, we aim to clarify the various pathologies involved in CMI, eliminate vague terminology, and present a clear, stepwise approach for both diagnosis and treatment of these injuries.


2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110071
Author(s):  
Patrick Carton ◽  
David Filan

Background: Inguinal disruption and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) are well-recognized sources of groin pain in athletes; however, the relationship between inguinal disruption and FAI remains unclear. In cases of dual pathology, where both entities coexist, there is no definitive consensus regarding which pathology should be prioritized for treatment in the first instance. Purpose: (1) To examine the 2-year effectiveness and clinical outcome in athletes presenting with dual pathology in which the FAI component alone was treated with arthroscopic deformity correction. (2) To compare 2-year patient-reported outcome measures between athletes undergoing only hip arthroscopy (HA) and athletes undergoing groin repair and HA. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All patients undergoing HA for the treatment of FAI with concomitant clinical signs of inguinal disruption at initial consultation were between 2010 and 2016 were included in this study. Inclusion criteria were male sex, age <40 years, and involvement in competitive sporting activity. Athletes with previous HA on the symptomatic side, Tönnis grade >1, or lateral center-edge angle <25° were excluded. Revision HA or subsequent groin surgery was documented. Outcome evaluation consisted of validated patient-reported outcome measures (modified Harris Hip Score; University of California, Los Angeles Activity Scale; 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) completed preoperatively and a minimum 2 years postoperatively. The minimal clinically important difference was assessed by using a distribution-based technique (SD, 0.5) and an anchor-based technique (percentage of possible improvement). Level of satisfaction and return to play were assessed. Results: A total of 113 cases of dual pathology were included in 91 patients with a mean ± SD age of 26.3 ± 5.1 years. The index surgical procedure was HA for 104 cases (92%) and groin repair for 9 (8%). For patients undergoing HA as the index procedure, 98.1% (102/104 cases) were successfully followed up to establish survivorship. In 89.2% (91/102 cases), no additional groin surgery was required. In 11 cases (10.8%), additional groin surgery was required for persisting inguinal-related groin pain. At 2 years after the operation, there was no difference for any patient-reported outcome measure ( P > .099), improvement from baseline ( P > .070), or proportion of cases achieving the minimal clinically important difference ( P > .120) between the HA-only group and the group undergoing HA and groin repair at any stage. There was also no difference between groups in terms of return-to-play rate ( P = .509) or levels of satisfaction (pain, P = .204; performance, P = .345). Conclusion: In patients with dual pathology, treatment of the FAI component alone using arthroscopic hip surgery results in a successful outcome without need for groin repair in 89.2% of cases. No statistical difference in clinical outcome 2 years after surgery was observed between athletes undergoing 1 procedure (HA alone) and those undergoing 2 procedures (HA and groin repair at any stage).


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. e0226011
Author(s):  
Erwin Brans ◽  
Inge H. F. Reininga ◽  
Hans Balink ◽  
Arvid V. E. Munzebrock ◽  
Bram Bessem ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi ◽  
Riccardo Cirelli ◽  
Ilaria Salati ◽  
Marco Enrico Mario Maino ◽  
Ennio Leopaldi ◽  
...  

Hernia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Roos ◽  
W. J. Bakker ◽  
E. A. Goedhart ◽  
E. J. M. M. Verleisdonk ◽  
G. J. Clevers ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Zachary K. Winkelmann ◽  
Kenneth E. Games

An 18-year-old, male collegiate basketball athlete complained of right testicular pain following basketball activities. The patient’s imaging denoted edema within the pubis at the insertion of the adductor longus tendon and rectus sheath aponeurosis consistent with inguinal disruption. The patient underwent conservative rehabilitation and attempted to return to participation with increased pain. Subsequently, the patient underwent surgery. Following surgical intervention, the patient underwent 6 weeks of rehabilitation with basketball-specific considerations. On conclusion, the patient was pain free and returned to activity. This case is unique due to the insidious onset, sport in which the patient participated, and failed conservative management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document