phenetic relations
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2011 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-227
Author(s):  
Adam Rostański ◽  
Paweł Wąsowicz

A morphometric study of the three species of <em>Lepidium</em> L. sect. <em>Dileptium</em> DC. is presented. Multivariate methods (cluster analysis and canonical discriminant analysis) were employed to investigate phenetic relations between examined individuals. As a result a set of quantitative characters useful in species determination was proposed and discussed.



2010 ◽  
Vol 288 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 99-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Aslam ◽  
K. Mohamed Rafi ◽  
K. Kathiravan ◽  
A. Shajahan


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Sutter ◽  
Nicola Sharratt

AbstractPrevious archaeological studies suggest that terminal Middle Horizon Tumilaca populations (cal A.D. 950–1150) of the middle Moquegua Valley represent direct descendants of earlier Chen Chen-style Tiwankau colonists of the region. This study tests this idea by comparing dentally derived biodistance analyses of Tumilaca, Chen Chen-style, Tiwanaku, and other regional samples. The results indicate that the Tumilaca and Chen Chen-style mortuary samples are similar to one another suggesting that these populations might share an ancestral-descendant relationship. The phenetic relations of the Tumilaca and Chen Chen to other regional samples are also discussed.



Crop Science ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 2289-2297 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. F. Torres ◽  
A. S. Arias ◽  
V. Arahana ◽  
M. L. Torres


1993 ◽  
Vol 71 (10) ◽  
pp. 1312-1327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Zuloaga ◽  
Jorge Dubcovsky ◽  
Osvaldo Morrone

Numerical studies based on 64 characters placed 188 American species of the genus Panicum L. in 23 sections clustered in five major groups. The same major groups were obtained when the five characters that define the subgenera were excluded from the analyses. Groups 1 and 2 included C4 species. Species with an outer parenchymatous sheath in group 1 corresponded to subg. Panicum, whereas species with a single mestome sheath in group 2 corresponded to subg. Agrostoides. Group 3 included the intermediate C3–C4 species belonging to subg. Steinchisma. C3 sections were clustered together but arranged in a different way than previous classifications. Group 4 included sections from subg. Phanopyrum with basic chromosome number x = 10, whereas group 5 included the other sections of Phanopyrum with x = 9 together with sections from subg. Dichanthelium also with x = 9. The two subgroups of subg. Phanopyrum are not only different in chromosome number but also in inflorescence type and upper anthecium ornamentation. On the other hand the x = 9 sections of Phanopyrum remain in the same cluster with sections from subg. Dichanthelium in numerical analyses where basic chromosome number is removed. These results suggest the possibility of sinking Dichanthelium into Phanopyrum and then split the latter when more cytological data become available. Kranz syndrome and basic chromosome number were the characters with the highest contribution to the delimitation of the major groups. On the basis of these results different existing hypotheses on the classification of the genus Panicum are discussed. Key words: Panicum, numerical taxonomy.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document