endoscopy simulation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

24
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Amit Rahul Persad ◽  
Lalit K. Verma ◽  
Rabindranath Persad

Implication: Here we report a simulation session carried out with pre-clerkship medical students during their gastroenterology block.  We used endoscopy simulator to cement the clinical and anatomic implications of endoscopy and to build interest in gastroenterology. Students thought the session was helpful for their interest and understanding. Endoscopy simulation provided for pre-clinical students could help to bolster high-level understanding of gastroenterology as well as understanding of clinical and procedural aspects of the specialty.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srivathsan Ravindran ◽  
Siwan Thomas-Gibson ◽  
Sam Murray ◽  
Eleanor Wood

Patient safety incidents occur throughout healthcare and early reports have exposed how deficiencies in ‘human factors’ have contributed to mortality in endoscopy. Recognising this, in the UK, the Joint Advisory Group for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have implemented a number of initiatives including the ‘Improving Safety and Reducing Error in Endoscopy’ (ISREE) strategy. Within this, simulation training in human factors and Endoscopic Non-Technical Skills (ENTS) is being developed. Across healthcare, simulation training has been shown to improve team skills and patient outcomes. Although the literature is sparse, integrated and in situ simulation modalities have shown promise in endoscopy. Outcomes demonstrate improved individual and team performance and development of skills that aid clinical practice. Additionally, the use of simulation training to detect latent errors in the working environment is of significant value in reducing error and preventing harm. Implementation of simulation training at local and regional levels can be successfully achieved with collaboration between organisational, educational and clinical leads. Nationally, simulation strategies are a key aspect of the ISREE strategy to improve ENTS training. These may include integration of simulation into current training or development of novel simulation-based curricula. However used, it is evident that simulation training is an important tool in developing safer endoscopy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 4054-4061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Formosa ◽  
Joseph Micah Prendergast ◽  
Jinghui Peng ◽  
Donald Kirkpatrick ◽  
Mark E. Rentschler

2017 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 881-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir C. Grover ◽  
Michael A. Scaffidi ◽  
Rishad Khan ◽  
Ankit Garg ◽  
Ahmed Al-Mazroui ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
pp. 835-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
John B. Ortolani ◽  
Daniel R. Tershak ◽  
John J. Ferrara ◽  
Charles J. Paget

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE)/American College of Gastroenterology Task Force (ACGTF) on Quality in Endoscopy released updated quality benchmarks for colonoscopy in 2015. Our initial study concluded that surgery residents could perform safe and competent screening colonoscopy within a structured endoscopy curriculum. In this follow-up study, we sought to determine whether surgery residents could achieve the increased adenoma detection rate (ADR) benchmarks endorsed by the ASGE/ACGTF. An Institutional Review Board-approved prospective analysis of colonoscopies performed by five postgraduate year 2 and 3 general surgery residents from 2013 to 2015 was completed. All colonoscopies were performed under the direct supervision of surgical endoscopists after each resident passed a structured endoscopy simulation curriculum. The following ASGE/ACG quality metrics were recorded: bowel preparation quality; cecal intubation rate; polyp and ADRs; and, complications. Power analysis determined that 108 procedures were required for an 80 per cent probability of data analysis accuracy. About 135 screening and diagnostic colonoscopies were performed. Bowel prep was considered “adequate” in 90 per cent of cases. The cecum was reached independently in 95 per cent of cases. Polyp(s) were visualized and removed in 39 per cent of patients. The overall ADR was 31.8 per cent (>25%). Male ADR was 38.7 per cent (>30%). Female ADR was 26.0 per cent (>20%). Average polyp size was 8.7 mm (range: 1–22 mm). One patient was readmitted for post-polypectomy syndrome, and successfully managed nonoperatively. In conclusion, using our structured endoscopy curriculum, surgery residents achieved ADRs fully consistent with the updated benchmark values endorsed by the ASGE/ACGTF.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunjin Gu ◽  
Cheongjun Kim ◽  
Doo Yong Lee

This paper reports a novel haptic interface to provide haptic feedback during endoscopy simulation. The proposed haptic interface combines two independent mechanisms to provide two decoupled degrees-of-freedom in the translational and the rotational directions. Effects of the apparent inertia–mass and apparent friction to the user's hand are measured in the form of resistive force and torque. The forces and torques that can be manifested by the developed haptic interface are compared with the exerted force data during actual endoscopy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 654-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Williams ◽  
Joanna R. Crossett ◽  
Elaine M. Cleveland ◽  
Charles P. Smoot ◽  
Kanayochukwu J. Aluka ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 416-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Maurice ◽  
Eleanor Wood ◽  
Katherine Jack

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document