Role of Radiographs and Ultrasound in Diagnosing Calcific Tendinitis and Periarthritis in the Wrist and Hand with Ultrasound-Guided Barbotage as Management Tool

Aim To demonstrate the role of radiographs and ultrasound (USG) in the diagnosis of calcific tendinitis and periarthritis in the wrist and hand and the efficacy of USG-guided barbotage for its management. Materials and Methods A retrospective chart review was performed in six patients who presented with acute-onset pain in the wrist and hand varying from 3 days to 2 weeks. Four patients had tenderness over pisiform and two patients had pain along the lateral aspect of the wrist and thumb. Radiographs and USG revealed calcific focus corresponding to the site of pain. USG-guided calcific barbotage and injection was performed for the same and pain relief was assessed immediately and through telephonic follow-up at 6 months using subjective satisfaction score. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2013. Results Four patients with tenderness over pisiform had flexor carpi ulnaris calcific tendinitis and two patients with pain along the lateral aspect of the wrist and thumb had first metacarpophalangeal calcific periarthritis and abductor pollicis brevis calcific tendinitis on radiographs as well as USG. In post-USG-guided calcific barbotage and injection, all patients had significant immediate and 6 months delayed relief in symptoms with excellent satisfaction scores. Conclusion Acute calcific tendinitis/periarthritis is a benign and self-limiting inflammatory condition. Radiographs are extremely helpful in identifying calcific focus. Ultrasonography in experienced hands is the best modality to identify, confirm the symptomatic calcific focus, and perform USG-guided intervention. USG-guided calcific barbotage is the simplest, quickest, and effective way to treat this condition and avoid compromised functional capacity.

304 Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: The Role of Mechanical Allodynia

INTRODUCTION MVD is ranked as the most effective remedy for TN. Nevertheless, not all patients can be completely cured by MVD, and recurrence or delayed relief may occur in a small proportion of patients. This dilemma reflects the lack of thorough understanding TN mechanisms, which are now considered a unique form of neuropathic pain and the most common type of neuralgia. This study was conducted to determine whether mechanical allodynia (MA) acts as a predictor of outcome after microvascular decompression (MVD) for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and discuss the potential pathological mechanisms involved. METHODS A series of 246 patients who underwent MVD for TN were involved in the study. The classifications were based on the characteristic of pain (shock-like or constant), and the presence of MA was defined from the chart review, retrospectively. The surgical outcome is defined as excellent, good, and poor. Immediate and long-term outcomes were compared to provide the information on recurrence and delayed relief. The relationship among the groups was investigated, and the strength was determined. RESULTS >Both presence of MA and type of TN pain are significant predictors of surgical outcome (P < 0.05). MA was proven to be an independent predictor of surgical outcome and also a significant predictor of existence of neurovascular compression (P < 0.05) and lower rate of recurrence (P < 0.05). No statistically significant predictors of delayed relief were detected in this study. CONCLUSION The presence of MA is a reliable predictor of immediate and long-term outcome after MVD for TN. Compared to the patients without MA, the incidence rate of intraoperative neurovascular compression (NVC) was higher in MA-positive patients, who were more likely to achieve a better outcome and lower rate of recurrence after MVD for TN. Application of the information in this study will be helpful in patient selection of MVD for TN.

Indications for Repeat Diagnostic Medial Branch Nerve Blocks Following a Failed First Medial Branch Nerve Block

No studies have directly measured the false negative rate of medial branch block (MBB) with correlation to medial branch neurotomy (MBN) outcome. We investigated the potential false negative MBB rate and the subsequent MBN outcome on a consecutive audit of all patients undergoing a double MBB protocol. We prospectively collected audit data and retrospectively collected data by phone on 229 consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic MBB. One-hundred-twenty-two patients reporting greater than 50% of subjective pain relief subsequently underwent either MBN or a confirmatory block followed by MBN. A total of 55 patients underwent a second confirmatory MBB and within that group 27.3% (15/55) reported less than 50% relief post initial MBB and 30.9% (17/55) between 50% and 69% relief. We performed an in-depth analysis of these 2 subgroups focusing on the reason a second MBB was performed despite a “negative” or “indeterminant” first MBB. We divided the “negative” responders to the first MBB into those reporting < 50% relief (Group 1) and those reporting between 50% and 69% relief (Group 2). We calculated a potential 46.7% false negative rate in Group 1 and 47.1% false negative in Group 2; however, the false negative results in Group 1 were predominately in those patients reporting delayed relief of pain and those re-blocked greater than 2 years after the first MBB. The success rate in all patients undergoing MBN was 87% compared to the 75% relief in the false negative groups with no statistically significant difference. In summary, the false negative rate for patients reporting less than 50% relief post MBB is probably less than 20% although there is a high “apparent negative” responds in patients reporting delayed relief or in those who had a second block 2 or more years post initial MBB. Patients reporting between 50 and 69% pain relief have a false negative response rate of 47.1% and should be considered for a confirmatory block. Key words: Facet rhizotomy, zygapophyseal joint, low back pain, chronic pain, facet joint, radiofrequency neurotomy, medial branch block, medial branch neurotomy

Microvascular Decompressions in Patients With Coexistent Hemifacial Spasm and Trigeminal Neuralgia

BACKGROUND: Although microvascular decompression (MVD) is widely accepted as the effective therapy for hemifacial spasm (HFS) or trigeminal neuralgia (TN), the surgical treatment of coexistent HFS and TN in an individual is seldom addressed. OBJECTIVE: To discuss the operative strategy of MVD for both the hemifacial and trigeminal nerves. METHODS: Nine consecutive cases of coexistent HFS and TN caused by neurovascular confliction in the same side were studied. Except for one, the patients suffered from HFS followed by ipsilateral TN. All patients underwent MVD and were followed up for 3 to 30 months. Each surgery was analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Intraoperatively, a looped vertebral artery (VA) shifted to the suffered side was found in 8 patients. The VA was regarded as the direct or indirect offending artery. After MVDs, the spasm ceased immediately in 6 patients; the other 3 patients had delayed relief within 3 months. The pain disappeared immediately in 7 of 9 patients. One patient felt relief after a week, and 1 had pain but improved slightly. No recurrence or complication was found. CONCLUSION: A shifted VA loop may account for this tic convulsif syndrome. MVD is a reasonable and effective therapy with a high cure rate for the disease. The key to the surgery is to move the VA proximally. The dissection should be performed rostrally starting from the caudal cranial nerves.