ventilating tubes
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

35
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2015 ◽  
Vol 153 (4) ◽  
pp. 636-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Hamilton Heidemann ◽  
Henrik Hein Lauridsen ◽  
Anette Drøhse Kjeldsen ◽  
Christian Emil Faber ◽  
Eva Charlotte Jung Johansen ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Englender ◽  
E. Somech ◽  
M. Harell

Biometrics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chap T. Le ◽  
Bruce R. Lindgren

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Berman ◽  
Robert Roark ◽  
Dennis Luckey

Objective. The purpose of this theoretical study is to assess the cost effectiveness of options involving observation, antibiotics alone, corticosteroids alone, corticosteroids plus antibiotics, and surgery to clear persisting middle ear effusions during three visits. Methodology. In a hypothetical case the expected average per patient expenditures are calculated using the efficacy rates determined by the meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials involving corticosteroids plus an antibiotic (six trials), corticosteroids alone (three trials), and antibiotic alone (four trials). In this analysis, all children whose bilateral middle ear effusions persist for 12 weeks despite medical management are referred for ventilating tubes. Results. The most cost-effective intervention combination is corticosteroid plus an antibiotic at visit 1 (6 weeks after diagnosis of acute otitis media) followed by a second antibiotic in nonresponders at visit 2 (9 weeks after diagnosis of acute otitis media) and referral for ventilating tubes in nonresponders at visit 3 (12 weeks after diagnosis of acute otitis media). The expected average expenditures per case to clear the bilateral middle ear effusions is $600.91 based on reimbursement of private practice charges and $350.27 based on Medicaid reimbursement (all payments to providers are based on 1992 data from Colorado). The difference in the expected average total expenditures per case between this most cost-effective approach versus the use of sequential courses of antibiotics followed by surgery is $372.81 ($973.72 - $600.91) with full reimbursement of private practice charges and $202.57 ($552.84 - $350.27) with Medicaid re imbursement. In clearing the middle ear effusion, the average estimated travel expenses per case is $21.46, and lost parental wages per case are $45.12. When the expenditures associated with an additional 6-month follow-up period are included, the expected average per case expenditures is $1088.54 with reimbursement of private practice charges and $659.00 with Medicaid reimbursement. The difference in the expected average per case expenditures to clear the effusions and follow-up for 6 months between the most cost-effective approach using corticosteroids plus antibiotics at the 6- and 9-week visits followed by surgery in nonresponders at 12 weeks versus sequential courses of antibiotics is $405.30 ($1493.84 - $1088.54) with reimbursement of private practice charges and $217.32 ($876.32 - $659.00) with Medicaid reimbursement. Recommendations. Although the analysis does not consider risks, side effects, and parental or provider preferences, the findings suggest that the implementation of cost-effective clinical guidelines can potentially reduce national expenditures for managing persistent middle ear effusions.


1991 ◽  
Vol 105 (12) ◽  
pp. 987-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avishay Golz ◽  
S. Thomas Westerman ◽  
Liane M. Gilbert ◽  
Henry Z. Joachims ◽  
Aviram Netzer

AbstractAlthough middle ear effusion was once described as the most common cause of vestibular disturbance in children, the association between glue ear and symptoms of dysequilibrium has never been quantified objectively.In this study the effect of middle ear effusion on the vestibular system of the inner ear was studied in a select group of children suffering from long lasting effusion in the middle ear with no evidence of infection at least one year prior to the study. The results were compared with results obtained from otitis free children, as well as from examinations of children after the insertion of ventilating tubes.The results of this study confirm the assumption that middle ear effusion has an adverse effect on the vestibular system, which can be resolved following the insertion of ventilation tubes.This effect may also contribute to the adverse effect that otitis media has on a child's development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document