2012 emilia earthquake
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

29
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Morandi ◽  
Christoph Butenweg ◽  
Khaled Breis ◽  
Katrin Beyer ◽  
Guido Magenes

Abstract Recent earthquakes as the 2012 Emilia earthquake sequence showed that recently built unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings behaved much better than expected and sustained, despite the maximum PGA values ranged between 0.20 - 0.30g, either minor damage or structural damage that is deemed repairable. Especially low-rise residential and commercial masonry buildings with a code-conforming seismic design and detailing behaved in general very well without substantial damages. The low damage grades of modern masonry buildings that was observed during this earthquake series highlighted again that codified design procedures based on linear analysis can be rather conservative. Although advances in simulation tools make nonlinear calculation methods more readily accessible to designers, linear analyses will still be the standard design method for years to come. The present paper aims to improve the linear seismic design method by providing a proper definition of the q-factor of URM buildings. These q-factors are derived for low-rise URM buildings with rigid diaphragms which represent recent construction practise in low to moderate seismic areas of Italy and Germany. The behaviour factor components for deformation and energy dissipation capacity and for overstrength due to the redistribution of forces are derived by means of pushover analyses. Furthermore, considerations on the behaviour factor component due to other sources of overstrength in masonry buildings are presented. As a result of the investigations, rationally based values of the behaviour factor q to be used in linear analyses in the range of 2.0 to 3.0 are proposed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 507-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Di Ludovico ◽  
Anna Chiaradonna ◽  
Emilio Bilotta ◽  
Alessandro Flora ◽  
Andrea Prota

The study focuses on the effects of liquefaction on structures taken from data on about 1000 private residential masonry buildings located in several municipalities struck by the 2012 Emilia earthquake. Survey data were collected by teams of experts coordinated by the Italian Department of Civil Protection in the immediate post-earthquake emergency phase. They included information on building characteristics and the level and extent of the damage to structural and non-structural components. Furthermore, according to data related to the reconstruction process, information on the liquefaction-induced type and extent of the damage was also collected. Through a comparative analysis of the empirical damage, it was found that liquefaction strongly affected the buildings, confirming its relevance in the damage scenario under specific subsoil conditions. Based on this evidence, the article proposes a correlation between structural damage and liquefaction when it comes to deriving proper preliminary empirical fragility curves. A suitable parameter to define liquefaction effects at ground level is introduced and correlated to damage grades defined according to the European Macroseismic Scale: EMS-98.


2020 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 105931
Author(s):  
Elisa Zuccolo ◽  
Francesca Bozzoni ◽  
Jorge Crempien ◽  
Carlo G. Lai

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 389-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Chiaradonna ◽  
Giuseppe Tropeano ◽  
Anna d’Onofrio ◽  
Francesco Silvestri

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1222-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Martinelli ◽  
Giulia Tagliazucchi ◽  
Gianluca Marchi

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the formative dimensions of organizational resilience – namely dynamic capabilities (DCs) and social capital – displayed by retail entrepreneurs in the face of natural disasters (i.e. the 2012 Emilia earthquake). The paper evaluates social capital and the various types of DCs that support small entrepreneurs’ resilience during three temporal units of analysis: before the earthquake, during the emergency period, and during the recovery process. Design/methodology/approach The study was performed by applying a qualitative approach based on two focus groups and a double set of semi-structured interviews administered to a sample of eight small retail entrepreneurs hit by the 2012 Emilia earthquake. Content analysis was then applied. Findings The findings show that DCs and social capital are instrumental to enhancing organizational resilience; moreover the contribution of each category of DCs (reconfiguration, leveraging, sensing and interpreting, learning and knowledge integration) and social capital to entrepreneurs’ resilience changes according to the temporal phase of the natural disaster under analysis. Research limitations/implications This study will provide small retailer entrepreneurs and public authorities with useful insights on how DCs and social capital can practically support recovery paths at different times in the occurrence of a natural disaster. Originality/value This study contributes to the scientific debate on organizational resilience in disaster management, studying it through the lens of DCs and social capital, and analyzing the role of different types of DCs in developing entrepreneurs’ resilience during the various periods of a natural disaster. Moreover, it contributes by applying the concepts of resilience and DCs to a poorly investigated entrepreneurial context such as the retail one.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-333
Author(s):  
Federico Passeri ◽  
Cesare Comina ◽  
Valeria Marangoni ◽  
Sebastiano Foti ◽  
Sara Amoroso

A blast-induced liquefaction test was conducted in the surroundings of Mirabello (NE Italy), where extensive liquefaction phenomena were observed after the 2012 Emilia earthquake. This experiment is the first blast-induced liquefaction test carried out in Italy. Several geophysical investigations were performed at the site to define initial soil condition and to evaluate the variations of the geophysical parameters over time. Specifically compressional ( V P ) and shear ( V S ) wave velocities were measured using both invasive (down-hole) and non-invasive (surface wave) tests. Electric Resistivity Tomography (ERT) tests were also carried out. Tests results before and after the blast-induced liquefaction are here presented and discussed with respect to the observed liquefaction effects. The evolution of measured geophysical parameters suggests that the soil modifications due to blasting ( i.e., changes in porosity and soil structure) can be imaged with the adopted approaches.


2018 ◽  
Vol 763 ◽  
pp. 1121-1128
Author(s):  
Marco Mezzi ◽  
Gianluca Nestovito ◽  
Paolo Petrella ◽  
Vincenzo Cefaliello

The bridge in Poggio Renatico crossing the Reno river on the railway line between Bologna and Ferrara, consists of steel decks supported by masonry abutments and piers, while foundations and pier caps are made of reinforced concrete. After the 2012 Emilia Earthquake and accounting for the fluvial erosion below the piers foundations, a structural assessment of the bridge was carried out in accordance with to the current Italian rules. Although a sufficient structure capacity against the actual transit loads resulted, the bridge showed some inadequacies with respect to the load models provided by both the national standard for constructions and the guidelines of the Italian railway network company. The retrofitting project consists of an improvement of the structural capacity of all the elements: girders, piers and abutments. An innovative retrofitting solution provides for the strengthening of the existing decks through a suspension system of cables anchored to steel towers standing on both abutments and piers and creating a kind of suspended bridge. The retrofitting is compatible with the normal scheduled interruptions of the rail traffic thereby reducing the maintenance costs of the railway system. The structural solution represents a model easily replicable to solve analogous situations along the railway network.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 224-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Maria D'Altri ◽  
Giovanni Castellazzi ◽  
Stefano de Miranda ◽  
Antonio Tralli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document