binocular diplopia
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

72
(FIVE YEARS 34)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 114-118
Author(s):  
Jiyoung Lee ◽  
Yeon Woong Chung

Purpose: To report a case of a 29-year-old binocular-diplopia patient diagnosed with intracranial hypertension, caused by a subdural hematoma due to intracranial hypotension.Case summary: A 29-year-old male hypertensive patient, diagnosed 2 months previously with idiopathic intracranial hypotension, presented to an ophthalmologist with a 4-day history of binocular diplopia. Visual acuity was 1.0/0.63 (1.0) without relative afferent pupillary defects. There was bilateral papilledema, right 6th cranial nerve palsy, and blind spot enlargement in visual field examinations, suggestive of intracranial hypertension. Computer tomography of the brain identified a 2- to 3-week-old subdural hematoma, a complication of intracranial hypotension, which may have led to intracranial hypertension.Conclusion: While persistent headaches in intracranial hypertension patients progress to intracranial hypotension due to lowered cerebrospinal fluid pressures, this is the first report of intracranial hypotension progressing to intracranial hypertension.


Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 989
Author(s):  
Juraj Timkovic ◽  
Jiri Stransky ◽  
Petr Handlos ◽  
Jaroslav Janosek ◽  
Hana Tomaskova ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: In patients with orbital floor blowout fracture (OFBF), accurate diagnosis of ocular motility disorder is important for decisions about conservative or surgical therapy. However, the accuracy of the traditional test for detecting binocular diplopia/ocular motility disorder using a moving pencil or finger (hereinafter, “finger test”) has been generally accepted as correct and has not been subject to scrutiny so far. Hence, its accuracy relative to full orthoptic examination is unknown. Materials and Methods: In this paper, the results of the “finger test” were compared with those derived from a complex examination by orthoptic tests (considered “true” value in patients with OFBF). Results: “Finger test” detected ocular motility disorder in 23% of patients while the full orthoptic examination proved much more efficient, detecting ocular motility disorder in 65% of patients. Lancaster screen test and test with color filters were the most important tests in the battery of the orthoptic tests, capable of identifying 97.7% and 95.3% of patients with ocular motility disorder, respectively. Still, none of the tests were able to correctly detect all patients with ocular motility disorder in itself. Conclusions: As the presence of ocular motility disorder/binocular diplopia is an important indication criterion for the surgical solution of the orbital floor blowout fracture, we conclude that a complex orthoptic evaluation should be always performed in these patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
pp. 1309-1314
Author(s):  
Gee-Hyun Kim ◽  
Mi-Ra Park

Purpose: To report a case of idiopathic orbital inflammation presenting with isolated myositis of the inferior oblique muscle. Case summary: A 54‐year‐old man presented with swelling on the left lower lid, pain on superonasal and inferonasal gaze, and binocular diplopia for 2 months. His head was tilted to the right by about 5° and mild conjunctival injection and 3 mm narrowing of palpebral fissure of the left eye compared to the other eye were observed. Eight prism diopter (PD) left hypertropia and 4 PD intermittent esotropia were noted on primary gaze, which worsened on leftward gaze, downward gaze, and left head tilt. Orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed enhanced hypertrophy of the left inferior oblique muscle. Systemic work‐up for possible inflammatory diseases yielded negative results. Therefore, a presumptive diagnosis of idiopathic isolated myositis of the left inferior oblique muscle was made. The patient was treated with 60 mg of oral corticosteroid per day for the first week, and the dose was tapered for 1 month as the symptoms reduced. Two months later, the patient became free from any symptoms and follow-up orbital MRI showed a significant decrease in size of the left inferior oblique muscle. There have been no signs of recurrence for 7 months. Conclusions: A presumptive diagnosis of idiopathic isolated myositis of the inferior oblique muscle was made in a patient with swelling of the left lower lid and binocular diplopia based on orbital MRI and systemic work‐up. Good results were achieved with oral corticosteroid therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 2605-2608
Author(s):  
Amal Akammar ◽  
Ghita Sekkat ◽  
Sylvie Kolani ◽  
Nizar El Bouardi ◽  
Meriem Haloua ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 229255032110270
Author(s):  
Ashley N. Boustany ◽  
Carly D. Comer ◽  
Harsha Gopal ◽  
Samuel J. Lin ◽  
Sumner A. Slavin

Diplopia after rhinoplasty is a rare complication that requires immediate medical attention. Workup should include a complete history and physical examination, appropriate imaging, and consultation with ophthalmology. Diagnosis may be challenging due to the wide differential ranging from dry eyes to orbital emphysema to an acute stroke. Patient evaluation should be expedient, though thorough to facilitate time-sensitive therapeutic interventions. Here, we present a case of transient binocular diplopia presenting 2 days after closed septorhinoplasty. The visual symptoms were attributed to either intra-orbital emphysema or a decompensated exophoria. This is the second documented case of orbital emphysema after rhinoplasty presenting with diplopia. It is the only case with a delayed presentation as well as the only case that resolved after positional maneuvers.


Author(s):  
Gianluigi R Palmieri ◽  
Mattia Sansone ◽  
Roberto De Simone ◽  
Marcello Moccia

Background: Diplopia is the double vision of a single object, and can be binocular or monocular. Binocular diplopia is caused by the misalignment of the visual axes, with images falling on the fovea of the fixating eye and on the extra-foveal retina of the non-fixating eye, as a consequence of both neurological (i.e., oculomotor nerve palsies, ocular myopathies, neuromuscular junction disorders) and ophthalmic disorders (i.e., decompensation of a pre-existing strabismus). In contrast, monocular diplopia is generally explained by intraocular pathology (i.e., refractive errors, ocular media abnormalities, dry eyes), causing the image of a single object to fall, at the same time, on the fovea and on the extra-foveal retina of the same eye. Methods: We report the case of a 22-year-old woman presenting with acute-onset monocular diplopia. Results: The diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) was based on the presence of papilloedema and elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure. Monocular diplopia resolved after CSF subtraction. Conclusions: We describe a case of monocular diplopia as a presenting symptom of IIH, and discuss diagnostic issues of this possibly underestimated symptom in neurology clinical practice. Careful ophthalmic and neuro-ophthalmic examination can identify clinical features of diplopia, and drive diagnosis and treatment.


Author(s):  
Fatih ÇALIŞKAN ◽  
Celal KATI ◽  
Hızır Ufuk AKDEMİR ◽  
Yıldıray ÇELENK
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Emanuele Cerulli Irelli ◽  
Giuseppe Di Pietro ◽  
Giacomo Fisco ◽  
Biagio Orlando ◽  
Francesco Asci ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document