blind adaptive equalization
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

46
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagi Tadmor ◽  
Sapir Carmi ◽  
Monika Pinchas

In this paper, we propose for the 16 quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) input case, a dual-mode (DM), decision directed (DD) multimodulus algorithm (MMA) algorithm for blind adaptive equalization which we name as DM-DD-MMA. In this new proposed algorithm, the MMA method is switched to the DD algorithm, based on a previously obtained expression for the step-size parameter valid at the convergence state of the blind adaptive equalizer, that depends on the channel power, input signal statistics and on the properties of the chosen algorithm. Simulation results show that improved equalization performance is obtained for the 16 QAM input case compared with the DM-CMA (where CMA is the constant modulus algorithm), DM-MCMA (where MCMA is the modified CMA) and MCMA-MDDMA (where MDDMA is the modified decision directed modulus algorithm).


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
Monika Pinchas

The step-size parameter and the equalizer’s tap length are the system parameters in the blind adaptive equalization design. Choosing a large step-size parameter causes the equalizer to converge faster compared with applying a smaller value for the step size parameter. However, a higher step-size parameter leaves the system with a higher residual inter-symbol-interference (ISI) than does a lower step-size parameter. The equalizer’s tap length should be set large enough to compensate for the channel distortions. However, since the channel parameters are unknown, the required equalizer’s tap length is also unknown. The system parameters are usually designed via simulation trials, in such a way that the equalizer’s performance from the residual ISI point of view reaches a system desired residual ISI level. Recently, a closed-form approximated expression was derived for the residual ISI as a function of the system parameters, input sequence statistics and channel power. This expression was obtained under the assumption having a value for the equalizer’s tap length that is sufficient to compensate for the channel distortions. Based on this approximated expression, the outcome from the step-size parameter multiplied by the equalizer’s tap length can be derived when the residual ISI is given. By choosing a step-size parameter, we automatically have also the value for the equalizer’s tap length which might now not be large enough to compensate for the channel distortions and thus leaving the system with a higher residual ISI than the required one. In this work, we derive an expression that sets a condition on the equalizer’s tap length based on the input sequence statistics, on the chosen equalizer’s characteristics and required residual ISI. In addition, highlights are supplied on how to set the equalizer’s tap length for different channel cases based on this new derived expression. The findings are accompanied by simulation results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document