Comparison of Therapeutic Effects of Topical Calcineurin Inhibitor and Moisturizing Cream on Pruritic External Auditory Canal

Although pruritic external auditory canal (PEAC) is a relatively common symptom, particularly in the geriatric population, its pathophysiology and appropriate treatment remain to be elucidated. We compared the therapeutic efficacy of pimecrolimus, a topical calcineurin inhibitor (CI), and a moisturizing cream (MC) in patients with PEAC. Thirty-nine patients (73 ears) were prospectively enrolled and treated topically twice daily with the CI (n = 20, 39 ears) or the MC (n = 19, 34 ears) for two weeks. The change in itching sensation was evaluated subjectively using a self-questionnaire at immediately, one month, and two months after self-application, and objectively by changes in erythema grading. Although topical treatment with the CI resulted in a more rapid improvement than treatment with the MC in patients with PEAC, the final outcomes did not differ between the groups. Furthermore, similar improvements in erythema scores were noted. The results of this study suggest that the MC, which rejuvenates the normal physiological status of the ear canal skin, may greatly benefit those elderly patients more susceptible to PEAC, without any concerns about adverse events and underlying comorbidities. Expanding upon the understanding of the role of moisturizers in the treatment of pruritic ears merits attention, as this knowledge provides a good example of the clinical guidelines for the management of PEAC.

Off-label Uses of Topical Pimecrolimus

Pimecrolimus is a topical calcineurin inhibitor currently approved for second-line use in the management of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis in patients age 2 years and older. Given the safety profile and nonsteroidal mechanism of pimecrolimus, there has been significant interest in its use in the treatment of a variety of dermatological conditions. This article reviews research that has been published on the off-label uses of topical pimecrolimus, with a focus on published RCTs. Convincing evidence exists supporting pimecrolimus’ efficacy in oral lichen planus and seborrheic dermatitis. For other conditions studied to date, pimecrolimus may prove to be a useful treatment alternative when conventional agents fail. Adverse events seen with its off-label use were typically application site reactions, the most common being a transient burning sensation. In summary, pimecrolimus appears to be an effective agent in the treatment of multiple dermatological conditions and may be worth considering as a pharmacologic alternative in several conditions when first-line treatment fails, or for areas that are more susceptible to the adverse effects of topical corticosteroids.