agricultural streams
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

115
(FIVE YEARS 22)

H-INDEX

29
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen C. Kadeka ◽  
Frank O. Masese ◽  
David M. Lusega ◽  
Augustine Sitati ◽  
Benjamin N. Kondowe ◽  
...  

Expansion of agriculture is particularly worrying in tropical regions of the world, where native forests have been replaced by croplands and grasslands, with severe consequences for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem functioning. However, limited data exist on the effects of agriculture on the functioning of tropical streams. We conducted a leaf litter decomposition experiment in coarse- and fine-mesh litterbags using the three species of leaves (Eucalyptus globulus [non-native], Vernonia myriantha, and Syzygium cordatum [indigenous]) in three forested and agricultural streams to determine the effect of agriculture on instream leaf litter decomposition in headwater stream sites. We also examined the functional composition of macroinvertebrates in the streams through the contents of benthic kick samples. Agricultural streams had a less dense riparian canopy and smaller abundance of coarse organic particulate matter, and higher electric conductivity and suspended solids than forested streams. In terms of the effects of litter quality on decomposition rates, Vernonia had the fastest decomposition rates while Eucalyptus had the slowest in both forested and agricultural sites. Shredder invertebrates were less abundant in agricultural streams, and in both stream types, they were less diverse and abundant than other functional groups. Overall, leaf litter decomposition rates did not respond to agricultural land-use. The hypothesized negative effects of agriculture on organic matter processing were minimal and likely modulated by intact riparian zones along agricultural streams.


Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 3443
Author(s):  
Lishani Wijewardene ◽  
Naicheng Wu ◽  
Pau Giménez-Grau ◽  
Cecilie Holmboe ◽  
Nicola Fohrer ◽  
...  

Stream biofilms play an important role in the structure, functioning, and integrity of agricultural streams. In many lowland streams, macrophyte vegetation is abundant and functions as an important substrate for biofilm (epiphyton) in addition to the gravel and stone substrate for epilithon on the stream bed. We expect that reach-scale habitat conditions in streams (e.g., nutrient availability, hydraulic conditions) affect the epiphyton and epilithon biomass and composition, and that this effect will be substrate-specific (macrophytes and stones). The objectives of our study were (i) to describe concurrent changes in epiphyton and epilithon biomass and composition over a year in agricultural streams, and (ii) to determine the substrate specific reach-scale habitat drivers for the epiphyton and epilithon structure. We monitored epiphyton and epilithon biofilm biomass and composition at three-week intervals and reach-scale environmental conditions daily during a year for two agricultural steams. The results showed that epiphyton and epilithon communities differed in biomass, having high substrate specific biomass in epilithon compared to epiphyton. Epiphyton was mainly composed of diatom and green algae, while cyanobacteria were more important in epilithon, and the diatom species composition varied between the two biofilm types. Epiphyton structural properties were less influenced by reach-scale hydrology and nutrient availability compared to epilithon. The overall explanatory power of the measured environmental variables was low, probably due to micro-scale habitat effects and interactive processes within stream biofilms. Knowledge of biofilm control in agricultural streams is important in order to improve management strategies, and future studies should improve the understanding of micro-scale habitat conditions, interactive relationships within biofilms and between the biofilm and the substrates.


2021 ◽  
pp. 117535
Author(s):  
Katharina Halbach ◽  
Monika Möder ◽  
Steffi Schrader ◽  
Liana Liebmann ◽  
Ralf B. Schäfer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 232 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas P. Moore ◽  
Catherine M. Febria ◽  
Angus R. McIntosh ◽  
Helen J. Warburton ◽  
Jon S. Harding

2021 ◽  
Vol 286 ◽  
pp. 112193
Author(s):  
Joachim Audet ◽  
Trine Mariane Olsen ◽  
Thomas Elsborg ◽  
Annette Baattrup-Pedersen ◽  
Tenna Riis
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Sara Sandström ◽  
Martyn N. Futter ◽  
David W. O'Connell ◽  
Emma E. Lannergård ◽  
Jelena Rakovic ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Tank ◽  
Shannon L. Speir ◽  
Lienne R. Sethna ◽  
Todd V. Royer
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 205 ◽  
pp. 111322
Author(s):  
M.M. Nicolosi Gelis ◽  
M.A. Mujica ◽  
A. Pecile ◽  
J. Donadelli ◽  
M. Simonetti ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document