emission capacity
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

32
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Yusong Wang ◽  
Dandan Wang ◽  
Xinxiao Yu ◽  
Guodong Jia ◽  
Xiaomin Chang ◽  
...  

The problem of farmland degradation and air pollution caused by wind erosion and particulate matter emissions is serious. Relying on biological soil crust coverage can effectively inhibit the production of wind erosion materials. However, recent studies have discussed the wind erosion and particulate matter emission processes separately and few studies analyzed both, clarifying the changes in the proportion of particulate matter emissions in the total wind erosion. Aiming at the typical farming-pastoral transition zone in the monsoon climate zone, this study used wind tunnels to analyze the wind erosion and particulate matter emissions of algae crusts and moss crusts for different wind speeds and coverage conditions. Results show that the effects of wind speed and coverage on the total wind erosion of biological soil crusts are similar. However, the emission of particulate matter is particularly sensitive to coverage of biological soil crusts. The proportion of particulate matter emissions in wind erosion decreases with increasing wind speed. According to the trend of the proportion with wind speed, the particle emission capacity of moss crust is directly proportional to the particle size and inversely proportional to the coverage. In contrast, the particle emission capacity of algae crust particles is proportional to the particle size, but the relationship with coverage is not regular. The results of this study can improve the knowledge of the relationship between wind erosion and particulate matter emissions and give relevant information for the management of wind erosion and particulate matter emissions.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliane Gomes-Alves ◽  
Tyeen Taylor ◽  
Pedro Assis ◽  
Giordane Martins ◽  
Rodrigo Souza ◽  
...  

<p>Isoprene regulates large-scale biogeochemical cycles by influencing atmospheric chemical and physical processes, and its dominant sources to the global atmosphere are the tropical forests. Although global and regional model estimates of isoprene emission have been optimized in the last decades, modeled emissions from tropical vegetation still carry high uncertainty due to a poor understanding of the biological and environmental controls on emissions. It is already known that isoprene emission quantities may vary significantly with plant traits, such as leaf phenology, and with the environment; however, current models still lack of good representation for tropical plant species due to the very few observations available. In order to create a predictive framework for the isoprene emission capacity of tropical forests, it is necessary an improved mechanistic understanding on how the magnitude of emissions varies with plant traits and the environment in such ecosystems. In this light, we aimed to quantify the isoprene emission capacity of different tree species across leaf ages, and combine these leaf measurements with long-term canopy measurements of isoprene and its biological and environmental drivers; then, use these results to better parameterize isoprene emissions estimated by MEGAN. We measured at the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO) site, central Amazonia: (1) isoprene emission capacity at different leaf ages of 21 trees species; (2) isoprene canopy mixing ratios during six campaigns from 2013 to 2015; (3) isoprene tower flux during the dry season of 2015 (El-Niño year); (3) environmental factors – air temperature and photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) - from 2013 to 2018; and (4) biological factors – leaf demography and phenology (tower based measurements) from 2013 to 2018. We then parameterized the leaf age algorithm of MEGAN with the measurements of isoprene emission capacity at different leaf ages and the tower-based measurements of leaf demography and phenology. Modeling estimates were later compared with measurements (canopy level) and five years of satellite-derived isoprene emission (OMI) from the ATTO domain (2013-2017). Leaf level of isoprene emission capacity showed lower values for old leaves (> 6 months) and young leaves (< 2 months), compared to mature leaves (2-6 months); and our model results suggested that this affects seasonal ecosystem isoprene emission capacity, since the demography of the different leaf age classes varied a long of the year. We will present more results on how changes in leaf demography and phenology and in temperature and PAR affect seasonal ecosystem isoprene emission, and how modeling can be improved with the optimization of the leaf age algorithm. In addition, we will present a comparison of ecosystem isoprene emission of normal years (2013, 2014, 2017 years) and anomalous years (2015 - El-Niño; and 2016 - post El-Niño), and discuss how a strong El-Niño year can influence plant functional strategies that can be carried over to the consecutive year and potentially affect isoprene emission.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 199 ◽  
pp. 80-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Tsan Wang ◽  
Christine Wiedinmyer ◽  
Kirsti Ashworth ◽  
Peter C. Harley ◽  
John Ortega ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (13) ◽  
pp. 4019-4032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliane G. Alves ◽  
Julio Tóta ◽  
Andrew Turnipseed ◽  
Alex B. Guenther ◽  
José Oscar W. Vega Bustillos ◽  
...  

Abstract. Isoprene fluxes vary seasonally with changes in environmental factors (e.g., solar radiation and temperature) and biological factors (e.g., leaf phenology). However, our understanding of the seasonal patterns of isoprene fluxes and the associated mechanistic controls is still limited, especially in Amazonian evergreen forests. In this paper, we aim to connect intensive, field-based measurements of canopy isoprene flux over a central Amazonian evergreen forest site with meteorological observations and with tower-mounted camera leaf phenology to improve our understanding of patterns and causes of isoprene flux seasonality. Our results demonstrate that the highest isoprene emissions are observed during the dry and dry-to-wet transition seasons, whereas the lowest emissions were found during the wet-to-dry transition season. Our results also indicate that light and temperature cannot totally explain isoprene flux seasonality. Instead, the camera-derived leaf area index (LAI) of recently mature leaf age class (e.g., leaf ages of 3–5 months) exhibits the highest correlation with observed isoprene flux seasonality (R2=0.59, p<0.05). Attempting to better represent leaf phenology in the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN 2.1), we improved the leaf age algorithm by utilizing results from the camera-derived leaf phenology that provided LAI categorized into three different leaf ages. The model results show that the observations of age-dependent isoprene emission capacity, in conjunction with camera-derived leaf age demography, significantly improved simulations in terms of seasonal variations in isoprene fluxes (R2=0.52, p<0.05). This study highlights the importance of accounting for differences in isoprene emission capacity across canopy leaf age classes and identifying forest adaptive mechanisms that underlie seasonal variation in isoprene emissions in Amazonia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document