scour countermeasure
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

31
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2022 ◽  
Vol 244 ◽  
pp. 110423
Author(s):  
Chao Ma ◽  
Chuanming Sheng ◽  
Jijian Lian ◽  
Fang Liu

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 3606
Author(s):  
Antonija Harasti ◽  
Gordon Gilja ◽  
Kristina Potočki ◽  
Martina Lacko

Bridge piers on large rivers are often protected from scouring using launchable stone, such as a riprap sloping structure. While such scour countermeasures are effective for pier protection, they significantly alter flow conditions in the bridge opening by overtopping flow and flow contraction, deflecting the formation of the scour hole downstream and exposing the downstream riverbed to additional scour. This paper provides a comprehensive and relevant review of bridge scour estimation methods for piers with a riprap sloping structure installed as a scour countermeasure. Research on empirical methods for bridge scour estimation is reviewed and analyzed with formulae used for comparable structures—complex pier formulae and formulae for river training structures. A summary of relevant formulae applicable to piers with installed scour countermeasures is provided, as well as a discussion on the possible future research directions that could contribute to the field.


Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 3052
Author(s):  
Wei-Lin Lee ◽  
Chih-Wei Lu ◽  
Chin-Kun Huang

This paper presents a study on bridge pier protection with a single porous basket (SPB) in clear-water experiments. The SPB is a type of combined flow-altering countermeasure. The SPB was installed at a distance ahead of the protected pier. After a series of tests, the results showed that appropriate installation of the SPB was able to effectively adjust the flow pattern to reduce the down-flow motion and horseshoe vortex ahead of the pier. Dominant factors for the pier protection—considered for all tests—included the distance between the basket and pier, submerged depth of the basket, basket length, pier diameter, basket diameter, hole size, porosity, and the flow approaching angle. After evaluating these parameters through laboratory tests, the results of protection were optimized. In optimal conditions, the SPB was able to provide maximum pier protection and decrease the maximum scour depth by as much as 75.53%.


Author(s):  
Mohsen Ranjbar-Zahedani ◽  
Alireza Keshavarzi ◽  
Hadi Khabbaz ◽  
James E. Ball

Eng ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-210
Author(s):  
Tom Craswell ◽  
Shatirah Akib

Scour is caused by the erosive action of flowing water, which causes materials from the bed and the banks of a river to be moved or unsettled. Hydraulic structures can be drastically impacted as a result of scour, which is why it is one of the most common causes of bridge failure around the world. With a predicted increase in climate conditions, the subsequent failure of hydraulic structures due to scour is likely to proliferate as the flooding of waterways is projected to rise. This study aims to determine the viability of introducing alternative materials to a scour countermeasure used in construction—gabion models—in a bid to improve the sustainability of a project whilst providing suitable scour mitigation measures. Existing literature was examined to comprehend the different scour countermeasures used, as well as the use of alternative materials that can be used as a scour countermeasure. A laboratory experiment was then carried out using a bridge pier embedded in a flume channel protected by gabion mattresses filled with alternative materials—stone, clothing and plastic—to analyse their effectiveness. The results demonstrate that stone filled gabions are most effective at reducing bridge pier scour. However, recycled clothing as a gabion fill could prove to be a viable alternative in construction projects, potentially leading to reduced construction costs and greater sustainability. However, more research on a greater scale is required to test this thesis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1663-1669 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Hamidifar ◽  
M. Nasrabadi ◽  
M.H. Omid
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Payam Khosravinia ◽  
Amir Malekpour ◽  
Ali Hosseinzadehdalir ◽  
Davod Farsadizadeh
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document