Epidemiology of paediatric orthopaedic-related trauma injuries sustained across a lockdown period during the COVID-19 pandemic

Objectives Lockdowns have been implemented by countries to slow down SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Singapore’s lockdown was enforced between 7 April 2020 and 1 June 2020. The objective of this study was to compare the epidemiology of paediatric orthopaedic trauma injuries during and immediately after the lockdown, with a non-pandemic period in 2019. Methods All paediatric outpatients and inpatients seen in our hospital following an orthopaedic-related traumatic injury from the 8-week lockdown and 8 weeks post-lockdown were evaluated. Cases for matched periods in 2019 were identified retrospectively for baseline comparison. Patient demographics, venue of injury, anatomic location of injury, caregiver supervision and location of procedures performed in the hospital were assessed. Results 968 and 2810 injuries were observed in 2020 and 2019, respectively. While the proportion of injuries sustained by pre-schoolers and toddlers increased, those sustained by primary and secondary school children decreased in 2020 ( p < 0.001). Majority of the injuries during the lockdown were sustained at home compared to schools or public recreational facilities ( p < 0.001). Hand (26.2%) and elbow (20.8%) injuries were the most common during the lockdown. The proportion of procedures performed in the Children’s Emergency during the lockdown was more than twice that of the same period in 2019 ( p < 0.001). Conclusion Our study showed a 2.9-fold decrease in orthopaedic-related injuries seen during the peri-lockdown period compared to a non-pandemic period. Pre-schoolers seem to be most vulnerable to injuries during the lockdown. Hand and elbow injuries were most common.

Risk Factors Associated With Femoral Ring Allograft Breakage in ALIF

Study design: This is a retrospective chart review. Objectives: To identify the incidence of, and variables correlated with, femoral ring allograft (FRA) fracture following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Methods: All patients who underwent ALIF using FRAs at an academic institution over 10 years were included. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed by both the primary and senior authors; fracture and no-fracture groups were created for comparison. Patient and surgical characteristics were extracted from electronic medical records. Frequency data comparisons were performed using contingency table analysis; comparisons of means were analyzed for continuous variables. A multivariate linear regression model was developed using screw use, graft height <12 mm, index level, and weight as variables. Results: A total of 76 FRAs in 59 patients were identified, 13 (17%) of which fractured. Age, sex, smoking status, use of buttress screws, weight, index level, and presence of spondylolisthesis were not correlated with incidence of fracture ( P > .05). There was a significant correlation between the height of FRA and incidence of fracture; 2% (1/52) of grafts ≥12 mm and 50% (12/24) of grafts <12 mm fractured ( P < .0001). Using ordinary least-squares regression, this result was independent of patient weight, use of screws, and index level. Of 10 patients, 9 did not require revision surgery to achieve fusion. Conclusions: Graft height was the only variable correlated with incidence of FRA fracture. Graft height <12 mm is an independent risk factor for FRA fracture in patients undergoing ALIF, and their use should be avoided in ALIF procedures.

Retrospective evaluation of canine and feline maxillomandibular trauma cases

SummaryObjectives: To determine differences in signalment between maxillomandibular (MM) and non-maxillomandibular (non-MM) trauma patients to help predict the type of injury sustained.Methods: A medical records database was searched from December 2003 to September 2012 to identify all MM trauma patients. A random sample of non-MM trauma patients was generated for comparison. Patient species, age, sex, weight, and injury aetiology were recorded for both populations.Results: Sixty-seven MM trauma patients and 129 non-MM trauma patients were identified. Feline patients were almost twice as likely to be presented for MM trauma compared with non-MM trauma. The median weight of canine patients suffering MM injury was significantly less than that of non- MM patients (p = 0.025). A significant association existed between the causes of injuries associated with MM and non-MM trauma populations (p = 0.000023). The MM trauma patients were more likely to sustain injury as a result of an animal altercation (Bonferroni p = 0.001) while non-MM injuries were more likely to result from motor vehicle accidents (Bonferroni p = 0.001). Overall, animals that were less than one year of age with traumatic injuries were overrepresented (65/196) in comparison to the entire patient population.Clinical significance: The results of this study may help guide clinicians in the evaluation and screening of trauma patients that are presented as an emergency. Cats, small dogs and animals suffering from animal altercations should all be closely evaluated for MM injury.